On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:50:06AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:35 AM Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:07:14PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 05:56:41PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > Hi Willy, > > > > > > > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > > > > > > > [auto build test ERROR on net/master] > > > > > > > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Willy-Tarreau/insufficient-TCP-source-port-randomness/20220427-145651 > > > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git 71cffebf6358a7f5031f5b208bbdc1cb4db6e539 > > > > config: i386-randconfig-r026-20220425 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220427/202204271705.VrWNPv7n-lkp@intel.com/config) > > > > compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.2.0-20) 11.2.0 > > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > > > > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/01b26e522b598adf346b809075880feab3dcdc08 > > > > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux > > > > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Willy-Tarreau/insufficient-TCP-source-port-randomness/20220427-145651 > > > > git checkout 01b26e522b598adf346b809075880feab3dcdc08 > > > > # save the config file > > > > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > > > > make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > > > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > > > ld: net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.o: in function `__inet_hash_connect': > > > > >> inet_hashtables.c:(.text+0x187d): undefined reference to `__umoddi3' > > > > > > Argh! indeed, we spoke about using div_u64_rem() at the beginning and > > > that one vanished over time. Will respin it. > > > > I fixed it, built it for i386 and x86_64, tested it on x86_64 and confirmed > > that it still does what I need. The change is only this: > > > > - offset = (READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + (port_offset >> 32)) % remaining; > > + div_u64_rem(READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + (port_offset >> 32), remaining, &offset); > > > > I'll send a v2 series in a few hours if there are no more comments. > > We really do not need 33 bits here. > > I would suggest using a 32bit divide. > > offset = READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + (port_offset >> 32)); > offset %= remaining; Yeah much better indeed, I'll do that. Thanks Eric! Willy