From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BC3C433F5 for ; Mon, 2 May 2022 15:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1380373AbiEBPon (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2022 11:44:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52464 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237714AbiEBPon (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2022 11:44:43 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 223F9D6; Mon, 2 May 2022 08:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 242FYc7g021553; Mon, 2 May 2022 15:41:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=O6DIFSoNk4s8Vqr2vfCTj3Ovj8TJFkMqm4fP4aYxYpY=; b=hc1jBNj1WyzVFqxVXOQelQOyoPh3U1PraDiXh1L0cd8SP6PC+BHQQkb0dY1SoBerhPNH WLoOkUedN8d0AV1nlXMdV60rAhnSyUgI8kG8uKbHoD54gifDwLlQ6KEn0MDMU+ETRJ+P V2BTb6fLLn4RRxmZ3+62IHkdfsQACc5cZdh/gBv/kKca6/hfo1YE3mfGjc0In7ZraQUj OLFgiFrD7YmGPNm+6JfE/av1Qlag5NqnKbpyyDpYqLbEews7n4oyQyccSyVlwAnF5WMk 6rjBYY26sVcypDyFjGswVLfkk14C6X0+HwjBO0X9lbusXVxtcu2AHC0EyogLLamBugPJ kw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ftj0qg8ww-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 02 May 2022 15:41:13 +0000 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 242FaTAp001051; Mon, 2 May 2022 15:41:13 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ftj0qg8w4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 02 May 2022 15:41:13 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 242FXRsT024507; Mon, 2 May 2022 15:41:10 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3frvr8tvpj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 02 May 2022 15:41:10 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 242FRquJ45875660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 2 May 2022 15:27:52 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9558142041; Mon, 2 May 2022 15:41:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533D24203F; Mon, 2 May 2022 15:41:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 2 May 2022 15:41:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch To: Thomas Huth , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch , David Hildenbrand , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 17:40:58 +0200 Message-Id: <20220502154101.3663941-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: A_0DISEuUIyk6-J0TUNi2GHC1C5laaPS X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 0Q6Ema_eEjQ0hBxrrbZRZue8PiDkALKT Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-02_04,2022-05-02_03,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205020122 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org See range diff below for changes. Since I messed up the addressees for the cover letter for the last version, the diff is against v5. v6 -> v7: * Add fetch-protection override test case to TPROT test * Change reporting of TPROT test to be more in line with other tests v5 -> v6: * Disable skey test in GitLab CI, needs kernel 5.18 * Added comment to test_set_prefix * Introduce names for tprot return values ... v2 -> v3: * fix asm for SET PREFIX zero key test: make input * implement Thomas' suggestions: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/f050da01-4d50-5da5-7f08-6da30f5dbbbe@redhat.com/ v1 -> v2: * use install_page instead of manual page table entry manipulation * check that no store occurred if none is expected * try to check that no fetch occurred if not expected, although in practice a fetch would probably cause the test to crash * reset storage key to 0 after test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch (3): s390x: Give name to return value of tprot() s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Disable s390x skey test in GitLab CI lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 31 +++-- lib/s390x/sclp.c | 6 +- s390x/skey.c | 250 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ s390x/tprot.c | 24 ++-- .gitlab-ci.yml | 2 +- 5 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) Range-diff against v5: -: -------- > 1: 6b11f01d s390x: Give name to return value of tprot() 1: 89e59626 ! 2: e3df88c6 s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions @@ s390x/skey.c: static void test_invalid_address(void) + report_prefix_push("TPROT"); + + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0); -+ report(tprot(addr, 0) == 0, "access key 0 -> no protection"); -+ report(tprot(addr, 1) == 0, "access key matches -> no protection"); -+ report(tprot(addr, 2) == 1, "access key mismatches, no fetch protection -> store protection"); ++ report(tprot(addr, 0) == TPROT_READ_WRITE, "zero key: no protection"); ++ report(tprot(addr, 1) == TPROT_READ_WRITE, "matching key: no protection"); ++ ++ report_prefix_push("mismatching key"); ++ ++ report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_READ, "no fetch protection: store protection"); ++ + + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x18, 0); -+ report(tprot(addr, 2) == 2, "access key mismatches, fetch protection -> fetch & store protection"); ++ report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED, ++ "fetch protection: fetch & store protection"); ++ ++ report_prefix_push("fetch-protection override"); ++ set_storage_key(0, 0x18, 0); ++ report(tprot(0, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED, "disabled: fetch & store protection"); ++ ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE); ++ report(tprot(0, 2) == TPROT_READ, "enabled: store protection"); ++ report(tprot(2048, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED, "invalid: fetch & store protection"); ++ ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE); ++ set_storage_key(0, 0x00, 0); ++ report_prefix_pop(); + + ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE); + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x90, 0); -+ report(tprot(addr, 2) == 0, "access key mismatches, storage protection override -> no protection"); ++ report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_READ_WRITE, ++ "storage-protection override: no protection"); + ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE); + ++ report_prefix_pop(); + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x00, 0); + report_prefix_pop(); +} @@ s390x/skey.c: static void test_invalid_address(void) +#define PREFIX_AREA_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE * 2) +static char lowcore_tmp[PREFIX_AREA_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PREFIX_AREA_SIZE))); + ++/* ++ * Test accessibility of the operand to SET PREFIX given different configurations ++ * with regards to storage keys. That is, check the accessibility of the location ++ * holding the new prefix, not that of the new prefix area. The new prefix area ++ * is a valid lowcore, so that the test does not crash on failure. ++ */ +static void test_set_prefix(void) +{ + uint32_t *prefix_ptr = (uint32_t *)pagebuf; -: -------- > 3: c3236718 Disable s390x skey test in GitLab CI base-commit: 6a7a83ed106211fc0ee530a3a05f171f6a4c4e66 -- 2.33.1