All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takshak Chahande <ctakshak@fb.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <ctakshak@fb.com>,
	<ndixit@fb.com>, <kafai@fb.com>, <andriin@fb.com>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <yhs@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: handle batch operations for map-in-map bpf-maps
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 14:37:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220502213705.1170077-2-ctakshak@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220502213705.1170077-1-ctakshak@fb.com>

This patch adds up test cases that handles 4 combinations:
 a) outer map: BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS
    inner maps: BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY and BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH
 b) outer map: BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS
    inner maps: BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY and BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH

Signed-off-by: Takshak Chahande <ctakshak@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 .../bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c      | 245 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 245 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c

v3->v4:
- Addressed nits; kept this map test together in map_tests/  (Yonghong, Andrii)

v2->v3:
- Handled transient ENOSPC correctly, bug was found in BPF CI (Daniel)

v1->v2:
- Fixed no format arguments error (Andrii)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3b56c874fbd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_in_map_batch_ops.c
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+#include <bpf/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+
+#include <test_maps.h>
+
+#define OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES 10
+
+static __u32 get_map_id_from_fd(int map_fd)
+{
+	struct bpf_map_info map_info = {};
+	uint32_t info_len = sizeof(map_info);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(map_fd, &map_info, &info_len);
+	CHECK(ret < 0, "Finding map info failed", "error:%s\n",
+	      strerror(errno));
+
+	return map_info.id;
+}
+
+/* This creates number of OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES maps that will be stored
+ * in outer map and return the created map_fds
+ */
+static void create_inner_maps(enum bpf_map_type map_type,
+			      __u32 *inner_map_fds)
+{
+	int map_fd, map_index, ret;
+	__u32 map_key = 0, map_id;
+	char map_name[15];
+
+	for (map_index = 0; map_index < OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES; map_index++) {
+		memset(map_name, 0, sizeof(map_name));
+		sprintf(map_name, "inner_map_fd_%d", map_index);
+		map_fd = bpf_map_create(map_type, map_name, sizeof(__u32),
+					sizeof(__u32), 1, NULL);
+		CHECK(map_fd < 0,
+		      "inner bpf_map_create() failed",
+		      "map_type=(%d) map_name(%s), error:%s\n",
+		      map_type, map_name, strerror(errno));
+
+		/* keep track of the inner map fd as it is required
+		 * to add records in outer map
+		 */
+		inner_map_fds[map_index] = map_fd;
+
+		/* Add entry into this created map
+		 * eg: map1 key = 0, value = map1's map id
+		 *     map2 key = 0, value = map2's map id
+		 */
+		map_id = get_map_id_from_fd(map_fd);
+		ret = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &map_key, &map_id, 0);
+		CHECK(ret != 0,
+		      "bpf_map_update_elem failed",
+		      "map_type=(%d) map_name(%s), error:%s\n",
+		      map_type, map_name, strerror(errno));
+	}
+}
+
+static int create_outer_map(enum bpf_map_type map_type, __u32 inner_map_fd)
+{
+	int outer_map_fd;
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, attr);
+
+	attr.inner_map_fd = inner_map_fd;
+	outer_map_fd = bpf_map_create(map_type, "outer_map", sizeof(__u32),
+				      sizeof(__u32), OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES,
+				      &attr);
+	CHECK(outer_map_fd < 0,
+	      "outer bpf_map_create()",
+	      "map_type=(%d), error:%s\n",
+	      map_type, strerror(errno));
+
+	return outer_map_fd;
+}
+
+static void validate_fetch_results(int outer_map_fd, __u32 *inner_map_fds,
+				   __u32 *fetched_keys, __u32 *fetched_values,
+				   __u32 max_entries_fetched)
+{
+	__u32 inner_map_key, inner_map_value;
+	int inner_map_fd, entry, err;
+	__u32 outer_map_value;
+
+	for (entry = 0; entry < max_entries_fetched; ++entry) {
+		outer_map_value = fetched_values[entry];
+		inner_map_fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(outer_map_value);
+		CHECK(inner_map_fd < 0,
+		      "Failed to get inner map fd",
+		      "from id(%d), error=%s\n",
+		      outer_map_value, strerror(errno));
+		err = bpf_map_get_next_key(inner_map_fd, NULL, &inner_map_key);
+		CHECK(err != 0,
+		      "Failed to get inner map key",
+		      "error=%s\n", strerror(errno));
+
+		err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(inner_map_fd, &inner_map_key,
+					  &inner_map_value);
+		CHECK(err != 0,
+		      "Failed to get inner map value",
+		      "for key(%d), error=%s\n",
+		      inner_map_key, strerror(errno));
+
+		/* Actual value validation */
+		CHECK(outer_map_value != inner_map_value,
+		      "Failed to validate inner map value",
+		      "fetched(%d) and lookedup(%d)!\n",
+		      outer_map_value, inner_map_value);
+	}
+}
+
+static void fetch_and_validate(int outer_map_fd,
+			       __u32 *inner_map_fds,
+			       struct bpf_map_batch_opts *opts,
+			       __u32 batch_size, bool delete_entries)
+{
+	__u32 *fetched_keys, *fetched_values, total_fetched = 0;
+	__u32 batch_key = 0, fetch_count, step_size;
+	int err, max_entries = OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES;
+	__u32 value_size = sizeof(__u32);
+
+	/* Total entries needs to be fetched */
+	fetched_keys = calloc(max_entries, value_size);
+	fetched_values = calloc(max_entries, value_size);
+	CHECK((!fetched_keys || !fetched_values),
+	      "Memory allocation failed for fetched_keys or fetched_values",
+	      "error=%s\n", strerror(errno));
+
+	for (step_size = batch_size;
+	     step_size <= max_entries;
+	     step_size += batch_size) {
+		fetch_count = step_size;
+		err = delete_entries
+		      ? bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(outer_map_fd,
+				      total_fetched ? &batch_key : NULL,
+				      &batch_key,
+				      fetched_keys + total_fetched,
+				      fetched_values + total_fetched,
+				      &fetch_count, opts)
+		      : bpf_map_lookup_batch(outer_map_fd,
+				      total_fetched ? &batch_key : NULL,
+				      &batch_key,
+				      fetched_keys + total_fetched,
+				      fetched_values + total_fetched,
+				      &fetch_count, opts);
+
+		if (err && errno == ENOSPC) {
+			/* Fetch again with higher batch size */
+			total_fetched = 0;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		CHECK((err < 0 && (errno != ENOENT)),
+		      "lookup with steps failed",
+		      "error: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+
+		/* Update the total fetched number */
+		total_fetched += fetch_count;
+		if (err)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	CHECK((total_fetched != max_entries),
+	      "Unable to fetch expected entries !",
+	      "total_fetched(%d) and max_entries(%d) error: (%d):%s\n",
+	      total_fetched, max_entries, errno, strerror(errno));
+
+	/* validate the fetched entries */
+	validate_fetch_results(outer_map_fd, inner_map_fds, fetched_keys,
+			       fetched_values, total_fetched);
+	printf("batch_op(%s) is successful with batch_size(%d)\n",
+	       delete_entries ? "LOOKUP_AND_DELETE" : "LOOKUP", batch_size);
+
+	free(fetched_keys);
+	free(fetched_values);
+}
+
+static void _map_in_map_batch_ops(enum bpf_map_type outer_map_type,
+				  enum bpf_map_type inner_map_type)
+{
+	__u32 *outer_map_keys, *inner_map_fds;
+	__u32 max_entries = OUTER_MAP_ENTRIES;
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_batch_opts, opts);
+	__u32 value_size = sizeof(__u32);
+	int batch_size[2] = {5, 10};
+	__u32 map_index, op_index;
+	int outer_map_fd, ret;
+
+	outer_map_keys = calloc(max_entries, value_size);
+	inner_map_fds = calloc(max_entries, value_size);
+	CHECK((!outer_map_keys || !inner_map_fds),
+	      "Memory allocation failed for outer_map_keys or inner_map_fds",
+	      "error=%s\n", strerror(errno));
+
+	create_inner_maps(inner_map_type, inner_map_fds);
+
+	outer_map_fd = create_outer_map(outer_map_type, *inner_map_fds);
+	/* create outer map keys */
+	for (map_index = 0; map_index < max_entries; map_index++)
+		outer_map_keys[map_index] =
+			((outer_map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS)
+			 ? 9 : 1000) - map_index;
+
+	/* batch operation - map_update */
+	ret = bpf_map_update_batch(outer_map_fd, outer_map_keys,
+				   inner_map_fds, &max_entries, &opts);
+	CHECK(ret != 0,
+	      "Failed to update the outer map batch ops",
+	      "error=%s\n", strerror(errno));
+
+	/* batch operation - map_lookup */
+	for (op_index = 0; op_index < 2; ++op_index)
+		fetch_and_validate(outer_map_fd, inner_map_fds, &opts,
+				   batch_size[op_index], false);
+
+	/* batch operation - map_lookup_delete */
+	if (outer_map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS)
+		fetch_and_validate(outer_map_fd, inner_map_fds, &opts,
+				   max_entries, true /*delete*/);
+
+	free(inner_map_fds);
+	free(outer_map_keys);
+}
+
+void test_map_in_map_batch_ops_array(void)
+{
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	printf("%s:PASS with inner ARRAY map\n", __func__);
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+	printf("%s:PASS with inner HASH map\n", __func__);
+}
+
+void test_map_in_map_batch_ops_hash(void)
+{
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	printf("%s:PASS with inner ARRAY map\n", __func__);
+	_map_in_map_batch_ops(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+	printf("%s:PASS with inner HASH map\n", __func__);
+}
-- 
2.30.2


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-02 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-02 21:37 [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: Extend batch operations for map-in-map bpf-maps Takshak Chahande
2022-05-02 21:37 ` Takshak Chahande [this message]
2022-05-04  0:13   ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: handle " Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220502213705.1170077-2-ctakshak@fb.com \
    --to=ctakshak@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=ndixit@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.