All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the mm tree with the folio tree
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 16:14:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220503161444.11003568@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1170 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the mm tree got a conflict in:

  fs/nfs/file.c

between commit:

  9ac3e82e9ae2 ("nfs: Convert to release_folio")

from the folio tree and commit:

  e1736b007c43 ("VFS: Add FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT file flag")

from the mm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/nfs/file.c
index d764b3ce7905,bfb4b707b07e..000000000000
--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@@ -522,8 -537,7 +534,7 @@@ const struct address_space_operations n
  	.write_begin = nfs_write_begin,
  	.write_end = nfs_write_end,
  	.invalidate_folio = nfs_invalidate_folio,
 -	.releasepage = nfs_release_page,
 +	.release_folio = nfs_release_folio,
- 	.direct_IO = nfs_direct_IO,
  #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
  	.migratepage = nfs_migrate_page,
  #endif

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-03  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-03  6:14 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-22  5:38 linux-next: manual merge of the mm tree with the folio tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-22  7:22 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-22 18:59   ` Andrew Morton
2022-06-23  2:15     ` Muchun Song
2022-06-20  3:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-12  8:26 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-12 11:52 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2022-05-12 12:51   ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-12 16:13     ` Ryusuke Konishi
2022-05-02  9:36 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220503161444.11003568@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.