From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D25C433EF for ; Sat, 7 May 2022 05:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1445707AbiEGFa7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 May 2022 01:30:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57384 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1445664AbiEGFax (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 May 2022 01:30:53 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 505504FC5D; Fri, 6 May 2022 22:26:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 827FD68AFE; Sat, 7 May 2022 07:26:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 07:26:49 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Christoph Hellwig , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reduce memory allocation in the btrfs direct I/O path Message-ID: <20220507052649.GA28014@lst.de> References: <20220504162342.573651-1-hch@lst.de> <20220505155529.GY18596@suse.cz> <20220506171803.GA27137@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220506171803.GA27137@magnolia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 10:18:03AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > The series is reasonably short so I'd like to add it to 5.20 queue, > > provided that the iomap patches get acked by Darrick. Any fixups I'd > > rather fold into my local branch, no need to resend unless there are > > significant updates. > > Hm. I'm planning on pushing out a (very late) iomap-5.19-merge branch, > since (AFAICT) these changes are mostly plumbing. Do you want me to > push the first three patches of this series for 5.19? Given that we have no conflicts it might be easiest to just merge the whole series through the btrfs tree.