From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0D7C433F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 23:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232348AbiEIXWm (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 19:22:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44060 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232336AbiEIXWi (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 19:22:38 -0400 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com (unknown [210.61.82.184]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4851151302; Mon, 9 May 2022 16:18:37 -0700 (PDT) X-UUID: bcb3ca1d964c4820a26c9c276bc88abb-20220510 X-CID-P-RULE: Release_Ham X-CID-O-INFO: VERSION:1.1.4,REQID:dc9a6e72-e91a-4097-bab1-e3017460814d,OB:0,LO B:0,IP:0,URL:0,TC:0,Content:0,EDM:0,RT:0,SF:0,FILE:0,RULE:Release_Ham,ACTI ON:release,TS:0 X-CID-META: VersionHash:faefae9,CLOUDID:a84ecb16-2e53-443e-b81a-655c13977218,C OID:IGNORED,Recheck:0,SF:nil,TC:nil,Content:0,EDM:-3,File:nil,QS:0,BEC:nil X-UUID: bcb3ca1d964c4820a26c9c276bc88abb-20220510 Received: from mtkexhb02.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.103)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (Generic MTA with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1906186339; Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:30 +0800 Received: from mtkmbs11n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.187) by mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkmbs11n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.2.792.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800 From: Miles Chen To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Remove msdc binding of mt8192 clock Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20220509231808.7657-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MTK: N Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rob, >On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 01:31:11PM +0800, Miles Chen wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> >> From: Matthias Brugger >> >> >> >> The msdc gate is part of the MMC driver. Delete the binding description >> >> of this node. >> > >> >An ABI break is okay because ...? >> >> Sorry for that, >> >> If the mediatek,mt8192-msdc part is removed from the driver, > >That's an ABI break too. You just need to explain why as Matthias did in >the commit message if the ABI break is okay. Thanks for your explanation. I would like to learn more about this. In this case If there was a user (say xxx.c) but the user was removed, can I remove mediatek,mt8192-msdc? thanks, Miles > >> Is it ok to keep "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" in the binding document? or >> we should add '# deprecated' to "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" and keep the example. > >We do that sometimes, but depends on the situation. > >Rob From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE00C433F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 23:29:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=F6+OosjlTwVl3LBVhD7TPb0YXWo2TjQ96qMxDP3l+3I=; b=wYNs7Fomq8u2/P aLYc69n3xtwk6+5KJTqZNHL4J3W/kpHvi1yrmeCJy2pabce+3J74jOe/lOjy/Br+jFdhvY7HN4gEW qlOJ82K4ysEz+7yqf7p1IDbMfaeixFYMe45kN82260yLmMWZyGYYJo91qXEjbKjnJi6rThfsFSESU NbgnQHjo+cH/ZmD8i4dxex2TwGJOShIVo7LjxDH3ljH5shF92/TtPNGYkzmlRigb6LSUXHGTJi1IM QJNFsnaoCWPdeCs27NqzILyXQbMffWa6BPYVUoB1i5pSVAljoK6H91k1FR2i23nQ2s2Uiagh6sVv0 Go6sB6A7rvfwMpy42Mgw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1noCoA-00GiaA-9W; Mon, 09 May 2022 23:28:54 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1noCnx-00GiMj-NJ; Mon, 09 May 2022 23:28:44 +0000 X-UUID: 4f3a8186dae94161ac608d42526d06d7-20220509 X-CID-P-RULE: Release_Ham X-CID-O-INFO: VERSION:1.1.4, REQID:c95cbf6a-92ed-4824-b162-7d97c8d75fc4, OB:0, LO B:0,IP:0,URL:0,TC:0,Content:0,EDM:0,RT:0,SF:0,FILE:0,RULE:Release_Ham,ACTI ON:release,TS:0 X-CID-META: VersionHash:faefae9, CLOUDID:586dcb16-2e53-443e-b81a-655c13977218, C OID:IGNORED,Recheck:0,SF:nil,TC:nil,Content:0,EDM:-3,File:nil,QS:0,BEC:nil X-UUID: 4f3a8186dae94161ac608d42526d06d7-20220509 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1745187795; Mon, 09 May 2022 16:28:33 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 9 May 2022 16:18:31 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs11n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.187) by mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkmbs11n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.2.792.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800 From: Miles Chen To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Remove msdc binding of mt8192 clock Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20220509231808.7657-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220509_162841_788152_0C590500 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.57 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, >On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 01:31:11PM +0800, Miles Chen wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> >> From: Matthias Brugger >> >> >> >> The msdc gate is part of the MMC driver. Delete the binding description >> >> of this node. >> > >> >An ABI break is okay because ...? >> >> Sorry for that, >> >> If the mediatek,mt8192-msdc part is removed from the driver, > >That's an ABI break too. You just need to explain why as Matthias did in >the commit message if the ABI break is okay. Thanks for your explanation. I would like to learn more about this. In this case If there was a user (say xxx.c) but the user was removed, can I remove mediatek,mt8192-msdc? thanks, Miles > >> Is it ok to keep "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" in the binding document? or >> we should add '# deprecated' to "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" and keep the example. > >We do that sometimes, but depends on the situation. > >Rob _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8B16C433F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 23:29:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=LhkXXnK1KGcc4rqA4XyCOIvoHMbmn1nDOYUVWt4b9E4=; b=Hye6kk3A4vIA/H 8D2hH47fG1EROqTEYRk2vjVt8k2/ynZzBykwBUD6uKr3iFqjCgN6TRzlZpwmbv68qZmaOFdcyvjzk 88uDIzVfH8eNauaLN3uwKLvM9eozN/bnSE4/9n2fpmWT282yq3+m+/dSWGqL5y2uRG6vNTGDpWwmu vzBR8lwZjM0+1yE709o9lSWAqj7JQAiY/EBgQS9rptMVbkpganbsKvHn8GXGwGUO+mkF4eDkAjro9 7puINrtifCK8Sau+0+t+zG055VU+e2dUlpQWis5p2N1kZ5amwC5YgfYyr4KMz7NP2jaQVdqfmiqFJ i/9TViQLC0e9DoeQY7Cw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1noCo2-00GiVr-Ed; Mon, 09 May 2022 23:28:46 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1noCnx-00GiMj-NJ; Mon, 09 May 2022 23:28:44 +0000 X-UUID: 4f3a8186dae94161ac608d42526d06d7-20220509 X-CID-P-RULE: Release_Ham X-CID-O-INFO: VERSION:1.1.4, REQID:c95cbf6a-92ed-4824-b162-7d97c8d75fc4, OB:0, LO B:0,IP:0,URL:0,TC:0,Content:0,EDM:0,RT:0,SF:0,FILE:0,RULE:Release_Ham,ACTI ON:release,TS:0 X-CID-META: VersionHash:faefae9, CLOUDID:586dcb16-2e53-443e-b81a-655c13977218, C OID:IGNORED,Recheck:0,SF:nil,TC:nil,Content:0,EDM:-3,File:nil,QS:0,BEC:nil X-UUID: 4f3a8186dae94161ac608d42526d06d7-20220509 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1745187795; Mon, 09 May 2022 16:28:33 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 9 May 2022 16:18:31 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs11n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.187) by mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkmbs11n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.2.792.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800 From: Miles Chen To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Remove msdc binding of mt8192 clock Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20220509231808.7657-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220509_162841_788152_0C590500 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.57 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, >On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 01:31:11PM +0800, Miles Chen wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> >> From: Matthias Brugger >> >> >> >> The msdc gate is part of the MMC driver. Delete the binding description >> >> of this node. >> > >> >An ABI break is okay because ...? >> >> Sorry for that, >> >> If the mediatek,mt8192-msdc part is removed from the driver, > >That's an ABI break too. You just need to explain why as Matthias did in >the commit message if the ABI break is okay. Thanks for your explanation. I would like to learn more about this. In this case If there was a user (say xxx.c) but the user was removed, can I remove mediatek,mt8192-msdc? thanks, Miles > >> Is it ok to keep "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" in the binding document? or >> we should add '# deprecated' to "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" and keep the example. > >We do that sometimes, but depends on the situation. > >Rob _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel