From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396A5C433F5 for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 07:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350717AbiELHGb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 03:06:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50670 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350736AbiELHGC (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 03:06:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E877525D for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 00:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id v10so3782313pgl.11 for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 00:05:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YI7qa/QXN/dczkT1YUrOOGjLkBD1yFf86CRdik/OXPc=; b=Y4apOYdNhXDppeVSa/hY0qEPuUky2k8Mg+NNjWBrW8mmFyzqzKMGoEWHE4GFn2zp4H cxj7pbd/24zF85Owm07osrmLRw6g2PD6EgaPzgQDGaeAukm6kGaAvSRpF2NXxyTATdTU lklv61EIttvQ3OGS2ci0xlBzXvhZPYzuqB223Cs7TnGxoZ9g/p9rgDbnwrNrTXTeUjwJ CRKFky5J7zDncf+87NEMYukF70kBixfmGKs31BrVSspYyJ9o+7maC2rRQCOfHoqf5KMN Sju56e+jlLk0zAiU3jppCPWN174v69+nsVIbDO+8ck5wqJunF68ADmKuV5IZmHvvH3Dz 6pLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YI7qa/QXN/dczkT1YUrOOGjLkBD1yFf86CRdik/OXPc=; b=wWYBOKGQ9j6FCVWiKBkzIxEGkwH3qTKhu0tbycV6LGCLm9D9ikYG9WqY4H/XZGxk/c DSePrc5tvDDHUYgBSSJUVxspoqZHYJQ0pRY4Vq7+7HlPQktABZGhnyM/5rvOVtj4cn1j EkB4sAPxFdLVMcy5TMbmww5CKKaohQUfyo0Bgf14IIl8rJIKV2b+4CvjvepdvGN9Blw8 IuFxTSGzyhVvb+k+YwDmwkNFYgtlQvdCNtQfyOCFaHaTY/s/kCTLEoxqVZOhF/GSZ3gG DjxDkNCWs+In48R+wstTiWdaVcAZn6gCj/HEofNTM2y/+GSkYapEMTj2Q96GygHDI3zv Ja7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532v7HUyoL7xDTXQDuz/2AEwk0k+RsEH/b/MVYxSZDCGFIRRfMUp jJCAP/8d9Nf2RHVJkcy2xK06YQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxi5KQrydwI8y97PuNn+ZsXxv/4PCd0/jR6YnFfztko70nCMswOPSAAnlzmeSO1zoISQydwtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:68c4:0:b0:3c6:c9a6:e316 with SMTP id d187-20020a6368c4000000b003c6c9a6e316mr13828351pgc.399.1652339139501; Thu, 12 May 2022 00:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.162.234.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d10-20020a170902ceca00b0015e8d4eb285sm3251896plg.207.2022.05.12.00.05.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 12 May 2022 00:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 12:35:36 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] cpufreq: Reorganize checks in cpufreq_offline() Message-ID: <20220512070536.6mbzhllvr6vme5g7@vireshk-i7> References: <5585781.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher> <4756874.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4756874.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11-05-22, 17:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Notice that cpufreq_offline() only needs to check policy_is_inactive() > once and rearrange the code in there to make that happen. > > No expected functional impact. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar -- viresh