From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3126C433EF for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1354220AbiELNKw (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 09:10:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60822 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1354199AbiELNKg (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 09:10:36 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 124F824F223; Thu, 12 May 2022 06:10:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24CCPOnq030082; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:10:32 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=ASZR1ISLUjcv6xgh/PKwoyKZ7X3ouFYmG9xh930aNZA=; b=SSDGmOD31NxZQ6VgdHXsnqLat8YRq1PiYw1QBMMHdJvWioqdMDxFYa70rliTEw4xW9j+ mmMbAZY23lzNYKTNWfOMOHfqStAHNlx2j/Zd4XQCOcb7nolxyteGI+a6Kn7V8OnIXX/T YgZTzV7KQhy42vY4QU0NyZkTG4vgm11Kgz7zQ/l7cbgK7bR09+V5Gicl3R8E66W0wG1P mNPYOXBQViVfwK238qtb1G/Zb+EGQ9WCJ4quJ21ek5rnQd9udpLnfRVHysLdy9GfBS4H RaEkHP8HA0xcvZd2wrKOhEwNLqdtrUtDYu/kMBQfFirqxsr3d3JlkqUUyLmMLfBBWkr8 Mw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g127v9662-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 May 2022 13:10:32 +0000 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24CCvdqa030862; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:10:31 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3g127v964y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 May 2022 13:10:31 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 24CD2jXr026785; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:10:29 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3fwgd8y33f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 May 2022 13:10:29 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 24CCumvL26739036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 May 2022 12:56:48 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D746AE045; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:10:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C30AE04D; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:10:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:10:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch To: Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , Paolo Bonzini , Shuah Khan Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch , David Hildenbrand , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: s390: selftest: Test suppression indication on key prot exception Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 15:10:18 +0200 Message-Id: <20220512131019.2594948-3-scgl@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20220512131019.2594948-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220512131019.2594948-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: h_HVN4N3wcQPd01F5_58dZhvjyqDFGK6 X-Proofpoint-GUID: aD9b1Pdu6OxK8x3VDklrocpJH5jP1rHf X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-12_10,2022-05-12_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205120061 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Check that suppression is not indicated on injection of a key checked protection exception caused by a memop after it already modified guest memory, as that violates the definition of suppression. Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c index b04c2c1b3c30..49f26f544127 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ #include #include +#include + #include "test_util.h" #include "kvm_util.h" @@ -194,6 +196,7 @@ static int err_memop_ioctl(struct test_vcpu vcpu, struct kvm_s390_mem_op *ksmo) #define SIDA_OFFSET(o) ._sida_offset = 1, .sida_offset = (o) #define AR(a) ._ar = 1, .ar = (a) #define KEY(a) .f_key = 1, .key = (a) +#define INJECT .f_inject = 1 #define CHECK_N_DO(f, ...) ({ f(__VA_ARGS__, CHECK_ONLY); f(__VA_ARGS__); }) @@ -430,9 +433,18 @@ static void test_copy_key_fetch_prot(void) TEST_ASSERT(rv == 4, "Should result in protection exception"); \ }) +static void guest_error_key(void) +{ + GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_INITED); + set_storage_key_range(mem1, PAGE_SIZE, 0x18); + set_storage_key_range(mem1 + PAGE_SIZE, sizeof(mem1) - PAGE_SIZE, 0x98); + GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_SKEYS_SET); + GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_IDLED); +} + static void test_errors_key(void) { - struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_copy_key_fetch_prot); + struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_error_key); HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED); HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET); @@ -446,6 +458,37 @@ static void test_errors_key(void) kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm); } +static void test_termination(void) +{ + struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_error_key); + uint64_t prefix; + uint64_t teid; + uint64_t teid_mask = BIT(63 - 56) | BIT(63 - 60) | BIT(63 - 61); + uint64_t psw[2]; + + HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED); + HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET); + + /* vcpu, mismatching keys after first page */ + ERR_PROT_MOP(t.vcpu, LOGICAL, WRITE, mem1, t.size, GADDR_V(mem1), KEY(1), INJECT); + /* + * The memop injected a program exception and the test needs to check the + * Translation-Exception Identification (TEID). It is necessary to run + * the guest in order to be able to read the TEID from guest memory. + * Set the guest program new PSW, so the guest state is not clobbered. + */ + prefix = t.run->s.regs.prefix; + psw[0] = t.run->psw_mask; + psw[1] = t.run->psw_addr; + MOP(t.vm, ABSOLUTE, WRITE, psw, sizeof(psw), GADDR(prefix + 464)); + HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_IDLED); + MOP(t.vm, ABSOLUTE, READ, &teid, sizeof(teid), GADDR(prefix + 168)); + /* Bits 56, 60, 61 form a code, 0 being the only one allowing for termination */ + ASSERT_EQ(teid & teid_mask, 0); + + kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm); +} + static void test_errors_key_storage_prot_override(void) { struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_copy_key_fetch_prot); @@ -668,6 +711,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) test_copy_key_fetch_prot(); test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override(); test_errors_key(); + test_termination(); test_errors_key_storage_prot_override(); test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled(); test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled(); -- 2.32.0