All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 08:33:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220513083052-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420201138.23854-5-joao.m.martins@oracle.com>

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 09:11:37PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> It is assumed that the whole GPA space is available to be DMA
> addressable, within a given address space limit, expect for a
> tiny region before the 4G. Since Linux v5.4, VFIO validates
> whether the selected GPA is indeed valid i.e. not reserved by
> IOMMU on behalf of some specific devices or platform-defined
> restrictions, and thus failing the ioctl(VFIO_DMA_MAP) with
>  -EINVAL.
> 
> AMD systems with an IOMMU are examples of such platforms and
> particularly may only have these ranges as allowed:
> 
> 	0000000000000000 - 00000000fedfffff (0      .. 3.982G)
> 	00000000fef00000 - 000000fcffffffff (3.983G .. 1011.9G)
> 	0000010000000000 - ffffffffffffffff (1Tb    .. 16Pb[*])
> 
> We already account for the 4G hole, albeit if the guest is big
> enough we will fail to allocate a guest with  >1010G due to the
> ~12G hole at the 1Tb boundary, reserved for HyperTransport (HT).
> 
> [*] there is another reserved region unrelated to HT that exists
> in the 256T boundaru in Fam 17h according to Errata #1286,
> documeted also in "Open-Source Register Reference for AMD Family
> 17h Processors (PUB)"
> 
> When creating the region above 4G, take into account that on AMD
> platforms the HyperTransport range is reserved and hence it
> cannot be used either as GPAs. On those cases rather than
> establishing the start of ram-above-4g to be 4G, relocate instead
> to 1Tb. See AMD IOMMU spec, section 2.1.2 "IOMMU Logical
> Topology", for more information on the underlying restriction of
> IOVAs.
> 
> After accounting for the 1Tb hole on AMD hosts, mtree should
> look like:
> 
> 0000000000000000-000000007fffffff (prio 0, i/o):
> 	 alias ram-below-4g @pc.ram 0000000000000000-000000007fffffff
> 0000010000000000-000001ff7fffffff (prio 0, i/o):
> 	alias ram-above-4g @pc.ram 0000000080000000-000000ffffffffff
> 
> If the relocation is done, we also add the the reserved HT
> e820 range as reserved.
> 
> Default phys-bits on Qemu is TCG_PHYS_BITS (40) which is enough
> to address 1Tb (0xff ffff ffff). On AMD platforms, if a
> ram-above-4g relocation may be desired and the CPU wasn't configured
> with a big enough phys-bits, print an error message to the user
> and do not make the relocation of the above-4g-region if phys-bits
> is too low.
> 
> Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> ---
>  hw/i386/pc.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index 8eaa32ee2106..aac32ba0bd02 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -803,6 +803,110 @@ void xen_load_linux(PCMachineState *pcms)
>  #define PC_ROM_ALIGN       0x800
>  #define PC_ROM_SIZE        (PC_ROM_MAX - PC_ROM_MIN_VGA)
>  
> +/*
> + * AMD systems with an IOMMU have an additional hole close to the
> + * 1Tb, which are special GPAs that cannot be DMA mapped. Depending
> + * on kernel version, VFIO may or may not let you DMA map those ranges.
> + * Starting Linux v5.4 we validate it, and can't create guests on AMD machines
> + * with certain memory sizes. It's also wrong to use those IOVA ranges
> + * in detriment of leading to IOMMU INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST or worse.
> + * The ranges reserved for Hyper-Transport are:
> + *
> + * FD_0000_0000h - FF_FFFF_FFFFh
> + *
> + * The ranges represent the following:
> + *
> + * Base Address   Top Address  Use
> + *
> + * FD_0000_0000h FD_F7FF_FFFFh Reserved interrupt address space
> + * FD_F800_0000h FD_F8FF_FFFFh Interrupt/EOI IntCtl
> + * FD_F900_0000h FD_F90F_FFFFh Legacy PIC IACK
> + * FD_F910_0000h FD_F91F_FFFFh System Management
> + * FD_F920_0000h FD_FAFF_FFFFh Reserved Page Tables
> + * FD_FB00_0000h FD_FBFF_FFFFh Address Translation
> + * FD_FC00_0000h FD_FDFF_FFFFh I/O Space
> + * FD_FE00_0000h FD_FFFF_FFFFh Configuration
> + * FE_0000_0000h FE_1FFF_FFFFh Extended Configuration/Device Messages
> + * FE_2000_0000h FF_FFFF_FFFFh Reserved
> + *
> + * See AMD IOMMU spec, section 2.1.2 "IOMMU Logical Topology",
> + * Table 3: Special Address Controls (GPA) for more information.
> + */
> +#define AMD_HT_START         0xfd00000000UL
> +#define AMD_HT_END           0xffffffffffUL
> +#define AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START  (AMD_HT_END + 1)
> +#define AMD_HT_SIZE          (AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START - AMD_HT_START)
> +
> +static hwaddr x86_max_phys_addr(PCMachineState *pcms,
> +                                hwaddr above_4g_mem_start,
> +                                uint64_t pci_hole64_size)
> +{
> +    PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
> +    X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
> +    MachineState *machine = MACHINE(pcms);
> +    ram_addr_t device_mem_size = 0;
> +    hwaddr base;
> +
> +    if (!x86ms->above_4g_mem_size) {
> +       /*
> +        * 32-bit pci hole goes from
> +        * end-of-low-ram (@below_4g_mem_size) to IOAPIC.
> +        */
> +        return IO_APIC_DEFAULT_ADDRESS - 1;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (pcmc->has_reserved_memory &&
> +       (machine->ram_size < machine->maxram_size)) {
> +        device_mem_size = machine->maxram_size - machine->ram_size;
> +    }
> +
> +    base = ROUND_UP(above_4g_mem_start + x86ms->above_4g_mem_size +
> +                    pcms->sgx_epc.size, 1 * GiB);
> +
> +    return base + device_mem_size + pci_hole64_size;
> +}
> +
> +static void x86_update_above_4g_mem_start(PCMachineState *pcms,
> +                                          uint64_t pci_hole64_size)
> +{
> +    X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
> +    CPUX86State *env = &X86_CPU(first_cpu)->env;
> +    hwaddr start = x86ms->above_4g_mem_start;
> +    hwaddr maxphysaddr, maxusedaddr;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The HyperTransport range close to the 1T boundary is unique to AMD
> +     * hosts with IOMMUs enabled. Restrict the ram-above-4g relocation
> +     * to above 1T to AMD vCPUs only.
> +     */
> +    if (!IS_AMD_CPU(env)) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Bail out if max possible address does not cross HT range */
> +    if (x86_max_phys_addr(pcms, start, pci_hole64_size) < AMD_HT_START) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Relocating ram-above-4G requires more than TCG_PHYS_BITS (40).
> +     * So make sure phys-bits is required to be appropriately sized in order
> +     * to proceed with the above-4g-region relocation and thus boot.
> +     */
> +    start = AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START;
> +    maxphysaddr = ((hwaddr)1 << X86_CPU(first_cpu)->phys_bits) - 1;
> +    maxusedaddr = x86_max_phys_addr(pcms, start, pci_hole64_size);
> +    if (maxphysaddr < maxusedaddr) {
> +        error_report("Address space limit 0x%"PRIx64" < 0x%"PRIx64
> +                     " phys-bits too low (%u) cannot avoid AMD HT range",
> +                     maxphysaddr, maxusedaddr, X86_CPU(first_cpu)->phys_bits);
> +        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> +    }
> +
> +
> +    x86ms->above_4g_mem_start = start;
> +}
> +
>  void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
>                      MemoryRegion *system_memory,
>                      MemoryRegion *rom_memory,
> @@ -823,6 +927,8 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
>  
>      linux_boot = (machine->kernel_filename != NULL);
>  
> +    x86_update_above_4g_mem_start(pcms, pci_hole64_size);
> +
>      /*
>       * Split single memory region and use aliases to address portions of it,
>       * done for backwards compatibility with older qemus.
> @@ -833,6 +939,11 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
>                               0, x86ms->below_4g_mem_size);
>      memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, 0, ram_below_4g);
>      e820_add_entry(0, x86ms->below_4g_mem_size, E820_RAM);
> +
> +    if (x86ms->above_4g_mem_start == AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START) {
> +        e820_add_entry(AMD_HT_START, AMD_HT_SIZE, E820_RESERVED);
> +    }


Causes a warning (and so a build failure) on 32 bit mingw:

../qemu/hw/i386/pc.c: In function 'pc_memory_init':
../qemu/hw/i386/pc.c:939:35: error: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
  939 |     if (x86ms->above_4g_mem_start == AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START) {
      |                                   ^~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors


Looking at the code, how is it supposed to work on 32 bit?
It's ok if it does not work but I'd like a graceful failure
not a silent corruption.



> +
>      if (x86ms->above_4g_mem_size > 0) {
>          ram_above_4g = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram_above_4g));
>          memory_region_init_alias(ram_above_4g, NULL, "ram-above-4g",
> -- 
> 2.17.2



  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-13 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20 20:11 [PATCH v4 0/5] i386/pc: Fix creation of >= 1010G guests on AMD systems with IOMMU Joao Martins
2022-04-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] hw/i386: add 4g boundary start to X86MachineState Joao Martins
2022-04-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] i386/pc: create pci-host qdev prior to pc_memory_init() Joao Martins
2022-04-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] i386/pc: pass pci_hole64_size " Joao Martins
2022-04-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable Joao Martins
2022-05-13 12:33   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-05-13 15:06     ` Joao Martins
2022-05-13 18:28       ` Joao Martins
2022-04-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] i386/pc: restrict AMD only enforcing of valid IOVAs to new machine type Joao Martins
2022-05-10  9:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] i386/pc: Fix creation of >= 1010G guests on AMD systems with IOMMU Joao Martins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220513083052-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ani@anisinha.ca \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.