All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] btrfs: add new read repair infrastructure
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 11:36:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519093641.GA32623@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2c4e54c-548b-2221-3bf7-31f6c14a03ee@gmx.com>

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 07:04:22AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Function btrfs_repair_read_bio() will only return true if all of its
> data matches csum.
>
> Consider the following case:
>
> Profile RAID1C3, 2 sectors to read, the initial mirror is 1.
>
> Mirror 1:	|X|X|
> Mirror 2:	|X| |
> Mirror 3:	| |X|
>
> Now we will got -EIO, but in reality, we can repair the read by using
> the first sector from mirror 3 and the 2nd sector from mirror 2.

I tried to write a test case for this by copying btrfs/140 and then
as a first step extending it to three mirrors unsing the raid1c1
profile.  But it seems that the tricks used there don't work,
as the code in btrfs/140 relies on the fact that the btrfs logic
address repored by file frag is reported by dump-tree as the item
"index" ĭn this line:

item 4 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 137756672) itemoff 15751 itemsiz

but for the raid1c3 profile that line reports something entirely
different.

for raid1:

logical: 137756672
item 4 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 137756672) itemoff 15751 itemsize 112

for raid1c3:

logical: 343998464
item 5 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 298844160) itemoff 15621 itemsize 144

any idea how to find physical sectors to corrupt for raid1c1?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-17 14:50 simple synchronous read repair Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/15] btrfs: introduce a pure data checksum checking helper Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:59   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-18  8:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20  8:45   ` Nikolay Borisov
2022-05-20 16:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/15] btrfs: quit early if the fs has no RAID56 support for raid56 related checks Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 15:00   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-18 17:07   ` Anand Jain
2022-05-20  8:47   ` Nikolay Borisov
2022-05-20 16:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 22:36       ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/15] btrfs: save the original bi_iter into btrfs_bio for buffered read Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/15] btrfs: remove duplicated parameters from submit_data_read_repair() Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 15:35   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-20 10:05   ` Nikolay Borisov
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/15] btrfs: add a helper to iterate through a btrfs_bio with sector sized chunks Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 15:27   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-18  8:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-18 10:07       ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-20 16:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-21  1:16           ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/15] btrfs: make repair_io_failure available outside of extent_io.c Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 15:18   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/15] btrfs: factor out a helper to end a single sector from submit_data_read_repair Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 15:18   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-17 22:17   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/15] btrfs: refactor end_bio_extent_readpage Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 22:22   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-18  8:48     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/15] btrfs: factor out a btrfs_csum_ptr helper Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 15:24   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-18  8:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/15] btrfs: add a btrfs_map_bio_wait helper Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 15:37   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-05-17 22:26   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-18  8:47     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/15] btrfs: set ->file_offset in end_bio_extent_readpage Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 22:47   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 12/15] btrfs: add new read repair infrastructure Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 23:04   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-18  8:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-18 10:20       ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-18 12:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-19  9:36     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-05-19 10:41       ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-19 10:45         ` Nikolay Borisov
2022-05-19 10:46           ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-19 10:50         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-19 11:27           ` Qu Wenruo
2022-05-20  6:43         ` Why btrfs no longer allocate the extent at the beginning of an empty chunk (was: Re: [PATCH 12/15] btrfs: add new read repair infrastructure) Qu Wenruo
2022-05-20 15:25     ` [PATCH 12/15] btrfs: add new read repair infrastructure Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 13/15] btrfs: use the new read repair code for direct I/O Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 14/15] btrfs: use the new read repair code for buffered reads Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 15/15] btrfs: remove io_failure_record infrastructure completely Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220519093641.GA32623@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.