All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] use static key to optimize pgtable_l4_enabled
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 22:34:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220521143456.2759-1-jszhang@kernel.org> (raw)

The pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled check sits at hot code path, performance
is impacted a lot. Since pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled isn't changed after
boot, so static key can be used to solve the performance issue[1].

An unified way static key was introduced in [2], but it only targets
riscv isa extension. We dunno whether SV48 and SV57 will be considered
as isa extension, so the unified solution isn't used for
pgtable_l4[l5]_enabled now.

patch1 fixes a NULL pointer deference if static key is used a bit earlier.
patch2 uses the static key to optimize pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-December/011164.html
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220517184453.3558-1-jszhang@kernel.org/T/#t

Since v3:
 - fix W=1 call to undeclared function 'static_branch_likely' error

Since v2:
 - move the W=1 warning fix to a separate patch
 - move the unified way to use static key to a new patch series.

Since v1:
 - Add a W=1 warning fix
 - Fix W=1 error
 - Based on v5.18-rcN, since SV57 support is added, so convert
   pgtable_l5_enabled as well.



Jisheng Zhang (2):
  riscv: move sbi_init() earlier before jump_label_init()
  riscv: turn pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled to static key for RV64

 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h    | 16 ++++----
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-32.h |  3 ++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 60 ++++++++++++++++++---------
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h    |  5 +--
 arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c             |  4 +-
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c           |  2 +-
 arch/riscv/mm/init.c                | 64 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c          | 16 ++++----
 8 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] use static key to optimize pgtable_l4_enabled
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 22:34:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220521143456.2759-1-jszhang@kernel.org> (raw)

The pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled check sits at hot code path, performance
is impacted a lot. Since pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled isn't changed after
boot, so static key can be used to solve the performance issue[1].

An unified way static key was introduced in [2], but it only targets
riscv isa extension. We dunno whether SV48 and SV57 will be considered
as isa extension, so the unified solution isn't used for
pgtable_l4[l5]_enabled now.

patch1 fixes a NULL pointer deference if static key is used a bit earlier.
patch2 uses the static key to optimize pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-December/011164.html
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220517184453.3558-1-jszhang@kernel.org/T/#t

Since v3:
 - fix W=1 call to undeclared function 'static_branch_likely' error

Since v2:
 - move the W=1 warning fix to a separate patch
 - move the unified way to use static key to a new patch series.

Since v1:
 - Add a W=1 warning fix
 - Fix W=1 error
 - Based on v5.18-rcN, since SV57 support is added, so convert
   pgtable_l5_enabled as well.



Jisheng Zhang (2):
  riscv: move sbi_init() earlier before jump_label_init()
  riscv: turn pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled to static key for RV64

 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h    | 16 ++++----
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-32.h |  3 ++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 60 ++++++++++++++++++---------
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h    |  5 +--
 arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c             |  4 +-
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c           |  2 +-
 arch/riscv/mm/init.c                | 64 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c          | 16 ++++----
 8 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-21 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-21 14:34 Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2022-05-21 14:34 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] use static key to optimize pgtable_l4_enabled Jisheng Zhang
2022-05-21 14:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] riscv: move sbi_init() earlier before jump_label_init() Jisheng Zhang
2022-05-21 14:34   ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-05-22  8:01   ` Atish Patra
2022-05-22  8:01     ` Atish Patra
2022-06-26  4:32   ` Anup Patel
2022-06-26  4:32     ` Anup Patel
2022-06-27  6:47     ` Atish Patra
2022-06-27  6:47       ` Atish Patra
2022-05-21 14:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] riscv: turn pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled to static key for RV64 Jisheng Zhang
2022-05-21 14:34   ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-05-24 15:59   ` Anup Patel
2022-05-24 15:59     ` Anup Patel
2022-06-05  6:12     ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-06-05  6:12       ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-06-26  4:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] use static key to optimize pgtable_l4_enabled Anup Patel
2022-06-26  4:33   ` Anup Patel
2022-07-02  3:48   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-07-02  3:48     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-07-15 13:35     ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-07-15 13:35       ` Jisheng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220521143456.2759-1-jszhang@kernel.org \
    --to=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.