From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DEBC433F5 for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 15:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236283AbiEUP23 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2022 11:28:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59654 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235234AbiEUP23 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2022 11:28:29 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com (mail-oi1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA4C3A1B4 for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 08:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id v9so8458221oie.5 for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 08:28:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=oh031xhM7yFSVNxIu2KE+QdCQ20+bqlYTwRHtUXQbyU=; b=E5DExNHTeGKmLZkQcx0IXinz111X9w7RFFPUzTKQxWZwGiZDTvEEFhUF/x23+mjei4 5APs0ubaB6p8jLPbHnoTEFsiRiXXQt3wTBSPKE4fRNiw9pO6OohPFQqQoKTFLVGjN8n8 J2hU/3ON/ArA+g4+URRsvIX6vcJmB0vssFakZa/Fyt6LYY2LLNG5lvSL2mJmXRfQTvU7 drDug6/8Fs7CWSl2xiKmEyylxmXRnboDXJIPX3uchs0jo2MTDPcf8e1nP1odUqW041q3 bVK89DBkQ5gZ7KB0xo4xIRN9SrF4Je/UxDEtznVIOIFBE9x/yb0S2R+THeCzGQE2kKtR PewA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=oh031xhM7yFSVNxIu2KE+QdCQ20+bqlYTwRHtUXQbyU=; b=Z14c8hNDbaiqLRZTA+4xQW5G5ftNoNYK1ApqWNA0izQU1sCfGje6PYmmv4dJATYR9u YXNGv+5P5Ako2dHItEbnlCf0Bdr387a9wRXmS8je2RXEOuLdk0y2x9mkZxZ7+MwBIeSE UPLIk8LMYukYvm4R+3gn3ewwT4LqR8SgUgSsSCuPzEx4YSgXUtvJdKbEeZ29bxaP2MWR dbLIqgA/7g1UYYydA1YgCjq/2NL7hrJg2iPdLxzm41WOefbJHsFKT/J/kNOQtv6rnQiS 0W/5SkVhBh9LkzdFdqrDq0DSoIt2NsKL0C7yrOZ9u66Ubar/L6uZhJw4zIbDrYeVUv2C 09Hw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325lWkBCIFfTLXDmm7IRKJz5fav/rbGm7Bd1mN01mDv6w5xuCQQ RZmwXCLrkwlgv7qFawiDE5+K3VGFJxQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzySwuKxYWlCSlqqznldu63A2FvsZ/Oqqo3+Z+l/BzLyjwrHkP+ICQ6bj3H3EkgBvtA5WNDDw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:150f:b0:32b:888:f534 with SMTP id u15-20020a056808150f00b0032b0888f534mr3355518oiw.223.1653146906441; Sat, 21 May 2022 08:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from illithid (ip68-12-97-90.ok.ok.cox.net. [68.12.97.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y199-20020a4a45d0000000b0040e699e8d8asm1701672ooa.45.2022.05.21.08.28.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 21 May 2022 08:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 10:28:24 -0500 From: "G. Branden Robinson" To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Various pages: srcfix. Replace .PD 0 with .TQ. Message-ID: <20220521152824.knp272wwl7qzpjmg@illithid> References: <20220521150040.45966-1-alx.manpages@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="urb2r32qlzcchugv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220521150040.45966-1-alx.manpages@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org --urb2r32qlzcchugv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Alex! At 2022-05-21T17:00:41+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Branden, >=20 > Could you please review this Linux man-pages patch? > If you like it, I'll apply the same changes to all of the pages. I am uncertain about this change. I like the idea of getting rid of `PD` calls, but I think there in value in having `TQ` possess semantics of "here is another tag that is related to the previous one after a TP call". You are (ab)using TQ here to avoid inter-paragraph space. As I noted in a message of a few minutes ago on the groff mailing list[1], it might be better to wait for what settles out of a discussion of the `BL` /`EL` macro pair I have (not yet formally) proposed for a post-1.23.0 groff man(7) extension. Regards, Branden [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2022-05/ --urb2r32qlzcchugv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEh3PWHWjjDgcrENwa0Z6cfXEmbc4FAmKJBRgACgkQ0Z6cfXEm bc4y1Q//QhKKrt8YPzr9qQn2dY2cP6U4CxLI7ZnXqCMZvjFRq7s+wlzJRAxOC1FZ hPB3BE79HpB+uyT+fotMsDxDfetYYMGpa9CQ3VWLiPxSLnlFiyNSHUjRlB4yNXU2 LV23aiqP1QAHpuNyIDAr+N1+dbSYYuDd5sKbbDhplkH6xmDO0AeCkMQtqsoNBG7P qL+UHsEv89i5/cc28DbuQ+U7aMEYcsguQC2upQKOT/Ou2qb7P2b8cJkyQj8dothT JjxZ7OsOUsEGF0emPq/G/QXlAGfAZzgyW956XQ0dLVmzqmzvvklhQc1ZCSgEFmLG wEf3/BXkfaSpVcucfURs6gN6HV1n5L3+vrHvDrSH/hlwOXXV06VHzP8NrMipy9Ag C7G/S+vW8hG3Kql2T5XvSge56V6QfGpsUWqGXUzaFyBU2Z9BepAkFvO/NKGCJt0T OgW75Lo6GMzlmlXWnPps74rio/9xJ19GctW6traI0Zi0p6Bk6Eqjm+5cphI/SyTH DQ3XoFUORr+93LK+y71x9+0eNbE/fdJgKKeMLpSTN8fdDpK4fC3hcH97MPHnGvsU qNp0eNTzx/KKU31Jkc2qjAhq3mF+JwxTdDUWQ1eIfPb32rprmwK0Wz9g5Q2me/BR 7RlXcWl6IRMKnQerlIw55Wy/kEuIxo2MfOh/TbAF8wapIy42v/s= =sosi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --urb2r32qlzcchugv--