[Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next 5/6] fs: dlm: use dlm_plock_info for do_unlock_close

[Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>]

This patch will refactor do_unlock_close() by using only struct
dlm_plock_info as parameter. There is only one use of do_unlock_close()
and the same variables was copied before into the used dlm_plock_info
structure.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
 fs/dlm/plock.c | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
index 868940c48e3a..cf7bba461bfd 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
@@ -79,8 +79,7 @@ static void send_op(struct plock_op *op)
    abandoned waiter.  So, we have to insert the unlock-close when the
    lock call is interrupted. */
 
-static void do_unlock_close(struct dlm_ls *ls, u64 number,
-			    struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl)
+static void do_unlock_close(const struct dlm_plock_info *info)
 {
 	struct plock_op *op;
 
@@ -89,15 +88,12 @@ static void do_unlock_close(struct dlm_ls *ls, u64 number,
 		return;
 
 	op->info.optype		= DLM_PLOCK_OP_UNLOCK;
-	op->info.pid		= fl->fl_pid;
-	op->info.fsid		= ls->ls_global_id;
-	op->info.number		= number;
+	op->info.pid		= info->pid;
+	op->info.fsid		= info->fsid;
+	op->info.number		= info->number;
 	op->info.start		= 0;
 	op->info.end		= OFFSET_MAX;
-	if (fl->fl_lmops && fl->fl_lmops->lm_grant)
-		op->info.owner	= (__u64) fl->fl_pid;
-	else
-		op->info.owner	= (__u64)(long) fl->fl_owner;
+	op->info.owner		= info->owner;
 
 	op->info.flags |= DLM_PLOCK_FL_CLOSE;
 	send_op(op);
@@ -167,7 +163,7 @@ int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
 			  __func__, ls->ls_global_id,
 			  (unsigned long long)number, op->info.pid);
 		dlm_release_plock_op(op);
-		do_unlock_close(ls, number, file, fl);
+		do_unlock_close(&op->info);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-- 
2.31.1