Hi all, On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:31:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:25:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:03:31 +0100 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > > > Em Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:10:45 +0100 > > > Marc Zyngier escreveu: > > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:01:18 +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > > > After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) > > > > > produced this warning: > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/gpio/driver.h:284: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent_handler_data_array' not described in 'gpio_irq_chip' > > > > > > > > > > Introduced by commit > > > > > > > > > > cfe6807d82e9 ("gpio: Allow per-parent interrupt data") > > > > > > > > > > But may actually be a problem with the tool :-( > > > > > > > > I guess the tool doesn't like having two fields that are part of a > > > > union documented together... Happy to tweak it if someone tells me how > > > > this should be written. > > > > > > Yes, that's the case. See, when you do: > > > > > > /** > > > * @parent_handler_data: > > > * @parent_handler_data_array: > > > * > > > * Data associated, and passed to, the handler for the parent > > > * interrupt. Can either be a single pointer if @per_parent_data > > > * is false, or an array of @num_parents pointers otherwise. If > > > * @per_parent_data is true, @parent_handler_data_array cannot be > > > * NULL. > > > */ > > > union { > > > void *parent_handler_data; > > > void **parent_handler_data_array; > > > }; > > > > > > The tool will understand it as an undocumented "parent_handler_data" and > > > a documented "parent_handler_data_array". > > > > > > It has to do that, as otherwise it won't get cases where people just adds a > > > @foo: as a template but actually forgets to fill it. > > > > > > The solution would be to add a description for both, e. g. something > > > similar to: > > > > > > /** > > > * @parent_handler_data: > > > * > > > * If @per_parent_data is false, contains a single pointer > > > * with the data associated, and passed to, the handler for the > > > * parent interrupt. > > > * > > > * @parent_handler_data_array: > > > * > > > * If @per_parent_data is true, it should contain an array of > > > * @num_parents pointers with the data associated, and passed to, > > > * the handler for the parent interrupt. Cannot be NULL. > > > */ > > > > I am still getting this warning. > > I am still getting this warning. I am still getting this warning. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell