From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9318EC433EF for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 21:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343508AbiFMVMQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:12:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36968 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1351889AbiFMVMD (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:12:03 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420BC32062 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id d18so7518839ljc.4 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:50:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4FfHmQjx4mtPcF8La0NIopHbF6tNLW/oeLpWOZtmNGg=; b=jXyWTWu2iZR/Cyrl/913Pbo9jNP6AF+X7LKt7paTtdS1tajD8e0k1ghb6RqwJg2v5H t/W0t/K843RDzH/PwEL6mz3Vp5D7ZphHl5CERSaP6nY2knu4cyl+bcw3BAyk5frgNCg8 TDAw7BK97UqIwVkxpMehlsSD4Gm69VDpivW771RRkPdE5QjAcusXD4yuQU8eUR/xkF81 tibpE6j9Y0z6lvnSOFJvWyqqFBPhHp1y2uH7sI2AlKb/0QZ/7UF8FL4e2Hoby/pweC3B SijMAQ8TedLZRh02kYj2UFN3jStULr7B/ryjwgU/KOQ3PMKHxOYkLggMMmFeloOyCnV3 E1Vw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4FfHmQjx4mtPcF8La0NIopHbF6tNLW/oeLpWOZtmNGg=; b=fU+XycXw3Tz0Czjn0T4wbBz4QbiKpHEP1zIMKbdl50We+wKTqay+C2h11ORV6Lf8U0 7XpejahpuM6CkzQg/tBasV6LxaG/sZ0pWYkKSaq7aUR/iYMIqxnxEQvzX3WlMA9n7GFG 88vEIDq/bGuHcF36qy7NOX6NbOeGQI13g+9pMnxiUtsnWiuQ+8SrNioOvi8CUfkWVvS7 Nlmy+jyjOfnx1Knz38eR5T4+oJVOFgTTVKWcr64GJBTyh9fcUov/eTnaaGCZqpIrrBnF YbwNVE69avj0HgWDDcLnh5H5ga6RdXpQLt6nklPWUDFz41zHEwGdvoxg1bB74Z/C7Zcg haQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9LG70Vu1YA7QuPBJrZKy8zjYXHtLshfmHjyiGNUSP556zuTVbJ GIa5JXWWdTdeqPM3gKWm8+OHfoOwOUKcLQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sTNPZvDVIfL1nmVad4noJQIU2r58ZeQRA1igUlcTKbeC7v8ExukYT/O2jWvK68NKHSJO5HWA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a90c:0:b0:258:edc3:4d2b with SMTP id j12-20020a2ea90c000000b00258edc34d2bmr691531ljq.225.1655153430490; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (boundsly.muster.volia.net. [93.72.16.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f2-20020a056512360200b004786eb19049sm1114763lfs.24.2022.06.13.13.50.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:50:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Eduard Zingerman To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com, song@kernel.org, joannelkoong@gmail.com Cc: eddyz87@gmail.com, Song Liu Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] selftests/bpf: specify expected instructions in test_verifier tests Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 23:50:04 +0300 Message-Id: <20220613205008.212724-2-eddyz87@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220613205008.212724-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> References: <20220613205008.212724-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Allows to specify expected and unexpected instruction sequences in test_verifier test cases. The instructions are requested from kernel after BPF program loading, thus allowing to check some of the transformations applied by BPF verifier. - `expected_insn` field specifies a sequence of instructions expected to be found in the program; - `unexpected_insn` field specifies a sequence of instructions that are not expected to be found in the program; - `INSN_OFF_MASK` and `INSN_IMM_MASK` values could be used to mask `off` and `imm` fields. - `SKIP_INSNS` could be used to specify that some instructions in the (un)expected pattern are not important (behavior similar to usage of `\t` in `errstr` field). The intended usage is as follows: { "inline simple bpf_loop call", .insns = { /* main */ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 1), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC, 0, 6), ... BPF_EXIT_INSN(), /* callback */ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .expected_insns = { BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 1), SKIP_INSNS(), BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_CALL, 8, 1) }, .unexpected_insns = { BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, INSN_OFF_MASK, INSN_IMM_MASK), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, .result = ACCEPT, .runs = 0, }, Here it is expected that move of 1 to register 1 would remain in place and helper function call instruction would be replaced by a relative call instruction. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Acked-by: Song Liu --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 234 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 234 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 372579c9f45e..1f24eae9e16e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ #endif #define MAX_INSNS BPF_MAXINSNS +#define MAX_EXPECTED_INSNS 32 +#define MAX_UNEXPECTED_INSNS 32 #define MAX_TEST_INSNS 1000000 #define MAX_FIXUPS 8 #define MAX_NR_MAPS 23 @@ -58,6 +60,10 @@ #define POINTER_VALUE 0xcafe4all #define TEST_DATA_LEN 64 +#define INSN_OFF_MASK ((__s16)0xFFFF) +#define INSN_IMM_MASK ((__s32)0xFFFFFFFF) +#define SKIP_INSNS() BPF_RAW_INSN(0xde, 0xa, 0xd, 0xbeef, 0xdeadbeef) + #define F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS (1 << 0) #define F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT (1 << 1) @@ -79,6 +85,23 @@ struct bpf_test { const char *descr; struct bpf_insn insns[MAX_INSNS]; struct bpf_insn *fill_insns; + /* If specified, test engine looks for this sequence of + * instructions in the BPF program after loading. Allows to + * test rewrites applied by verifier. Use values + * INSN_OFF_MASK and INSN_IMM_MASK to mask `off` and `imm` + * fields if content does not matter. The test case fails if + * specified instructions are not found. + * + * The sequence could be split into sub-sequences by adding + * SKIP_INSNS instruction at the end of each sub-sequence. In + * such case sub-sequences are searched for one after another. + */ + struct bpf_insn expected_insns[MAX_EXPECTED_INSNS]; + /* If specified, test engine applies same pattern matching + * logic as for `expected_insns`. If the specified pattern is + * matched test case is marked as failed. + */ + struct bpf_insn unexpected_insns[MAX_UNEXPECTED_INSNS]; int fixup_map_hash_8b[MAX_FIXUPS]; int fixup_map_hash_48b[MAX_FIXUPS]; int fixup_map_hash_16b[MAX_FIXUPS]; @@ -1126,6 +1149,214 @@ static bool cmp_str_seq(const char *log, const char *exp) return true; } +static int get_xlated_program(int fd_prog, struct bpf_insn **buf, int *cnt) +{ + struct bpf_prog_info info = {}; + __u32 info_len = sizeof(info); + __u32 xlated_prog_len; + __u32 buf_element_size = sizeof(struct bpf_insn); + + if (bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd_prog, &info, &info_len)) { + perror("bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd failed"); + return -1; + } + + xlated_prog_len = info.xlated_prog_len; + if (xlated_prog_len % buf_element_size) { + printf("Program length %d is not multiple of %d\n", + xlated_prog_len, buf_element_size); + return -1; + } + + *cnt = xlated_prog_len / buf_element_size; + *buf = calloc(*cnt, buf_element_size); + if (!buf) { + perror("can't allocate xlated program buffer"); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + bzero(&info, sizeof(info)); + info.xlated_prog_len = xlated_prog_len; + info.xlated_prog_insns = (__u64)*buf; + if (bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd_prog, &info, &info_len)) { + perror("second bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd failed"); + goto out_free_buf; + } + + return 0; + +out_free_buf: + free(*buf); + return -1; +} + +static bool is_null_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + struct bpf_insn null_insn = {}; + + return memcmp(insn, &null_insn, sizeof(null_insn)) == 0; +} + +static bool is_skip_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + struct bpf_insn skip_insn = SKIP_INSNS(); + + return memcmp(insn, &skip_insn, sizeof(skip_insn)) == 0; +} + +static int null_terminated_insn_len(struct bpf_insn *seq, int max_len) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < max_len; ++i) { + if (is_null_insn(&seq[i])) + return i; + } + return max_len; +} + +static bool compare_masked_insn(struct bpf_insn *orig, struct bpf_insn *masked) +{ + struct bpf_insn orig_masked; + + memcpy(&orig_masked, orig, sizeof(orig_masked)); + if (masked->imm == INSN_IMM_MASK) + orig_masked.imm = INSN_IMM_MASK; + if (masked->off == INSN_OFF_MASK) + orig_masked.off = INSN_OFF_MASK; + + return memcmp(&orig_masked, masked, sizeof(orig_masked)) == 0; +} + +static int find_insn_subseq(struct bpf_insn *seq, struct bpf_insn *subseq, + int seq_len, int subseq_len) +{ + int i, j; + + if (subseq_len > seq_len) + return -1; + + for (i = 0; i < seq_len - subseq_len + 1; ++i) { + bool found = true; + + for (j = 0; j < subseq_len; ++j) { + if (!compare_masked_insn(&seq[i + j], &subseq[j])) { + found = false; + break; + } + } + if (found) + return i; + } + + return -1; +} + +static int find_skip_insn_marker(struct bpf_insn *seq, int len) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < len; ++i) + if (is_skip_insn(&seq[i])) + return i; + + return -1; +} + +/* Return true if all sub-sequences in `subseqs` could be found in + * `seq` one after another. Sub-sequences are separated by a single + * nil instruction. + */ +static bool find_all_insn_subseqs(struct bpf_insn *seq, struct bpf_insn *subseqs, + int seq_len, int max_subseqs_len) +{ + int subseqs_len = null_terminated_insn_len(subseqs, max_subseqs_len); + + while (subseqs_len > 0) { + int skip_idx = find_skip_insn_marker(subseqs, subseqs_len); + int cur_subseq_len = skip_idx < 0 ? subseqs_len : skip_idx; + int subseq_idx = find_insn_subseq(seq, subseqs, + seq_len, cur_subseq_len); + + if (subseq_idx < 0) + return false; + seq += subseq_idx + cur_subseq_len; + seq_len -= subseq_idx + cur_subseq_len; + subseqs += cur_subseq_len + 1; + subseqs_len -= cur_subseq_len + 1; + } + + return true; +} + +static void print_insn(struct bpf_insn *buf, int cnt) +{ + int i; + + printf(" addr op d s off imm\n"); + for (i = 0; i < cnt; ++i) { + struct bpf_insn *insn = &buf[i]; + + if (is_null_insn(insn)) + break; + + if (is_skip_insn(insn)) + printf(" ...\n"); + else + printf(" %04x: %02x %1x %x %04hx %08x\n", + i, insn->code, insn->dst_reg, + insn->src_reg, insn->off, insn->imm); + } +} + +static bool check_xlated_program(struct bpf_test *test, int fd_prog) +{ + struct bpf_insn *buf; + int cnt; + bool result = true; + bool check_expected = !is_null_insn(test->expected_insns); + bool check_unexpected = !is_null_insn(test->unexpected_insns); + + if (!check_expected && !check_unexpected) + goto out; + + if (get_xlated_program(fd_prog, &buf, &cnt)) { + printf("FAIL: can't get xlated program\n"); + result = false; + goto out; + } + + if (check_expected && + !find_all_insn_subseqs(buf, test->expected_insns, + cnt, MAX_EXPECTED_INSNS)) { + printf("FAIL: can't find expected subsequence of instructions\n"); + result = false; + if (verbose) { + printf("Program:\n"); + print_insn(buf, cnt); + printf("Expected subsequence:\n"); + print_insn(test->expected_insns, MAX_EXPECTED_INSNS); + } + } + + if (check_unexpected && + find_all_insn_subseqs(buf, test->unexpected_insns, + cnt, MAX_UNEXPECTED_INSNS)) { + printf("FAIL: found unexpected subsequence of instructions\n"); + result = false; + if (verbose) { + printf("Program:\n"); + print_insn(buf, cnt); + printf("Un-expected subsequence:\n"); + print_insn(test->unexpected_insns, MAX_UNEXPECTED_INSNS); + } + } + + free(buf); + out: + return result; +} + static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, int *passes, int *errors) { @@ -1262,6 +1493,9 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, if (verbose) printf(", verifier log:\n%s", bpf_vlog); + if (!check_xlated_program(test, fd_prog)) + goto fail_log; + run_errs = 0; run_successes = 0; if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0 && test->runs >= 0) { -- 2.25.1