Re: [PATCH net] veth: Add updating of trans_start

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@redhat.com>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] veth: Add updating of trans_start
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:44:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220617124413.6848c826@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5765.1655484175@famine>

On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:42:55 -0700 Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> 	In this case, it's to permit the bonding ARP / ND monitor to
> function if that software device (veth in this case) is added to a bond
> using the ARP / ND monitor (which relies on trans_start, and has done so
> since at least 2.6.0).  I'll agree it's a niche case; this was broken
> for veth for quite some time, but veth + netns is handy for software
> only test cases, so it seems worth doing.

I presume it needs it to check if the device has transmitted anything
in the last unit of time, can we look at the device stats for LLTX for
example?

> 	I didn't exhaustively check all LLTX drivers, but, e.g., tun
> does update trans_start:
> 
> drivers/net/tun.c:
> 
>        /* NETIF_F_LLTX requires to do our own update of trans_start */
>         queue = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, txq);
>         txq_trans_cond_update(queue);

Well, it is _an_ example, but the only one I can find. And the
justification is the same as yours now -- make bonding work a31d27fb.
Because of that I don't think we can use tun as a proof that trans 
start should be updated on LLTX devices as a general, stack-wide rule.
There's a lot more LLTX devices than veth and tun.