From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC58C433EF for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 18:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1383511AbiFQSDB (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:03:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37688 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1383467AbiFQSCr (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:02:47 -0400 Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B5FBBB; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x64host.home (unknown [47.189.24.195]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CDD720C349A; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:02:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 2CDD720C349A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1655488956; bh=f/N9Y3AhHP+6L0TxuoLGQXAr5xuXJnauRqGxyO1ZK4A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HRjnyFlbpnIqs3McAQxj05HomUDTmHs3TrHvnrYbkW7W4wQTFS409j9w9nxRvlEWZ 9L2XPXbaXMiUylFO91RBzQaEapZZFOmhPsAzMPMPKX4DMBSZwB6SgQL7a2ETXzIqHh PjPCmqm59B8fSuhXS/iJMLtjZkONuhPRDlU7ft0g= From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com To: broonie@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com Subject: [RFC PATCH v15 6/6] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:02:19 -0500 Message-Id: <20220617180219.20352-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220617180219.20352-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20220617180219.20352-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() for ARM64. This works like arch_stack_walk() except that it returns -EINVAL if the stack trace is not reliable. Until all the reliability checks are in place, arch_stack_walk_reliable() may not be used by livepatch. But it may be used by debug and test code. Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman Reviewed-by: Mark Brown --- arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index eda8581f7dbe..8016ba0e2c96 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -383,3 +383,26 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie); } + +/* + * arch_stack_walk_reliable() may not be used for livepatch until all of + * the reliability checks are in place in unwind_consume(). However, + * debug and test code can choose to use it even if all the checks are not + * in place. + */ +noinline int notrace arch_stack_walk_reliable( + stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, + void *cookie, + struct task_struct *task) +{ + struct unwind_state state; + bool reliable; + + if (task == current) + unwind_init_from_caller(&state); + else + unwind_init_from_task(&state, task); + + reliable = unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie); + return reliable ? 0 : -EINVAL; +} -- 2.25.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 559BEC433EF for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 18:04:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=H3HjnY6KosPApFiVSbK8xEUAdlZA1+4XQXtLM74jYnI=; b=aipbeF+fda61ju uBX43yu0v3McKhmStDs/T5AUxroKQphp0rmL0dHj6tcebT6SQRB0ygYF78SGHc5StxLCC+JEdPQbv fYAoPqYWkjkU+fy596D7+3pbdet9rvNHadV+SVhzDzI/2lc6iUbu9rchlJSUBXQGo3GwW1vPT039x hj4pl9Fx9da7xLILpUnuZ2M5WVTyIdyaYbt1hVgmBQj5usPhwVf4aF91WA8a4qodDdwLZdMWNdtU/ hIhx2NG2Iycu89QwnfEGCJzaiIzxsRCS0gCX18+bU6/dZEn33G1rPRaIC0kNK9LRBcYglCxEt6w76 QEainoFxhnPGC7JZRGJg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o2GJn-008YKA-06; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 18:03:39 +0000 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o2GIv-008Y1c-HI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 18:02:46 +0000 Received: from x64host.home (unknown [47.189.24.195]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CDD720C349A; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:02:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 2CDD720C349A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1655488956; bh=f/N9Y3AhHP+6L0TxuoLGQXAr5xuXJnauRqGxyO1ZK4A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HRjnyFlbpnIqs3McAQxj05HomUDTmHs3TrHvnrYbkW7W4wQTFS409j9w9nxRvlEWZ 9L2XPXbaXMiUylFO91RBzQaEapZZFOmhPsAzMPMPKX4DMBSZwB6SgQL7a2ETXzIqHh PjPCmqm59B8fSuhXS/iJMLtjZkONuhPRDlU7ft0g= From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com To: broonie@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com Subject: [RFC PATCH v15 6/6] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:02:19 -0500 Message-Id: <20220617180219.20352-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220617180219.20352-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20220617180219.20352-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220617_110245_648070_AEC2C16C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.36 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() for ARM64. This works like arch_stack_walk() except that it returns -EINVAL if the stack trace is not reliable. Until all the reliability checks are in place, arch_stack_walk_reliable() may not be used by livepatch. But it may be used by debug and test code. Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman Reviewed-by: Mark Brown --- arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index eda8581f7dbe..8016ba0e2c96 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -383,3 +383,26 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie); } + +/* + * arch_stack_walk_reliable() may not be used for livepatch until all of + * the reliability checks are in place in unwind_consume(). However, + * debug and test code can choose to use it even if all the checks are not + * in place. + */ +noinline int notrace arch_stack_walk_reliable( + stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, + void *cookie, + struct task_struct *task) +{ + struct unwind_state state; + bool reliable; + + if (task == current) + unwind_init_from_caller(&state); + else + unwind_init_from_task(&state, task); + + reliable = unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie); + return reliable ? 0 : -EINVAL; +} -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel