From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A58FC43334 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDCA3C920D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:27:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 166BC3C0727 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:27:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E36860005A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:27:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id h14-20020a1ccc0e000000b0039eff745c53so1565642wmb.5 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 06:27:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eZHF0/Xy00OusPXQpmT3OsUGkGM/6gJxUM3v5ToG2EU=; b=fx+vlV0wMRKp5G2SPzPrm/Xrp9Z27RAttY9xbLG8SwZMMAJD/EPia6auvnm3CuKQNL TjWlBh2MhnnLorgyCRA1egcV5sWbGF8AByYymNeqrXGTl6ncRgRyg14+IgvN2XzwIyBf EUJWISUbFlDzszFmmPKXlLLmVOZxCK5BkEzOSJaGYhhfzcwBTyyE8fWBFZN2VaFw6AsZ JaG9CWJ/R/qT2/LtUzPoOswxUygfvQFDO9NsKnLLs6ScM1sKeHIu0aijFD/JJPbDkzGZ oMQZpALiv/daFVIKWdi+eolR/L9UTxhkcr8+rpuUx64RlNxBb6UG3caMyP7fPgdj9U50 AgYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eZHF0/Xy00OusPXQpmT3OsUGkGM/6gJxUM3v5ToG2EU=; b=Z1wsNFKdapv5AfDJBAWj9ZsddrPF1/bPhFStTgYAgCXgdw9/P8qCua1GaXDyi76ysB oQwSwAJymY5T22Tpro2SwcUw4gae/XDcNQoWGkq0MbyUmX9cGgbXdyzaeLOq1hI3Le5a WviyooQnY2NsfGgENwcN973pGhi14pg2mg5HR7uLDxZhUVx0V/sRmFS7473pDjyKiLB8 rgufzoBH73jveeBL3W+tuYGtvF+n1tHbJmb6WnakdTaYBeGtyCGblI5kr+TpRn0Zmikk jzxLAuUp/9tpFcLvk8OMvNOsLJBWIfCdQWSZuQe6fDZQWumdY76bhXysj3gv7ny6AbsR kPsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora94bJLI4P9P/NUBUXu9AOfEo8ebZk3FwroBIQz5eut2b8qxVKL+ FxLIRmi5P5FaK56gH40y+gM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1umvcwADg1C89hHKqOKP5DpDP9WcYoNrgO0xA9UBm30v0yOpK3BVfp9saSCncwd+o5F5Dh75Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3551:b0:39c:8a93:869 with SMTP id i17-20020a05600c355100b0039c8a930869mr24134529wmq.107.1655731662834; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 06:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amir-ThinkPad-T480.ctera.local (bzq-166-168-31-246.red.bezeqint.net. [31.168.166.246]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5-20020a5d4f85000000b0021b862ad439sm9086556wru.9.2022.06.20.06.27.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 06:27:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Amir Goldstein To: Petr Vorel Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 16:27:33 +0300 Message-Id: <20220620132737.2015073-1-amir73il@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 0/4] More fanotify tests for v5.19 X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Matthew Bobrowski , Jan Kara , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Petr, I remembered I also have these 2 new test cases for a fix in v5.19-rc1. The bug is quite niche and fix is not trivial to backport to LTS kernels, so I chose not to run these test cases for kernel < 5.19, similar to the approach we took with another fix in fanotify10. Thanks, Amir. Amir Goldstein (4): syscalls/fanotify09: Cleanup open event fds on error syscalls/fanotify09: Verify if no events are expected syscalls/fanotify09: Tidy up the test to make it more readable syscalls/fanotify09: Add test cases for merge of ignore mask .../kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify09.c | 180 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 130 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1 -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp