From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637C6C433EF for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 20:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239787AbiFTUa6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 16:30:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34350 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235229AbiFTUa4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 16:30:56 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D2718377; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id BC9041C0BCC; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:30:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:30:51 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/84] 5.10.124-rc1 review Message-ID: <20220620203051.GA23287@duo.ucw.cz> References: <20220620124720.882450983@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220620124720.882450983@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.124 release. > There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. CIP testing did not find any problems here: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCYrDY+wAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8ishAJ95S35q9Uw0QGzqXp1Y9p9ZNCn00QCfQj6+IGtdNcsmU+6YWRC7ZVFijEY= =4iVG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--