From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C29C433EF for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344246AbiF1KAR (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 06:00:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57242 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344641AbiF1J7s (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 05:59:48 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb4a.google.com (mail-yb1-xb4a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b4a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70A632F660 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 02:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb4a.google.com with SMTP id 130-20020a251288000000b0066c81091670so8863780ybs.18 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 02:59:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=1QsQANeqdFobJvV2MAaRL6zWG6aX2Y9RNZ6A4p9R7aA=; b=F4htJF5lqfKtgcyb4cAn8IQaq74+Q2O0+ji0Ft0mREvWHOjzPQY3JSlIdKjYUUT10v CqEsNMzmJikhcWU4EN+KhQq6THyYW4S+4O5omA3EIaETGok9+fJMmrOuXXSIfU+hU5Ad LGPgHt/K10WVukeIgHuIaTmQbIIFh2gluK2rlVxO6gOAwGiD7EIshnk1p5kDYtkUk5Ge 8kJq2INdNgnWW9/2cKGlKJul/c6oJZWxeStBsMr+uLKi/Vs7LPVK/oMiRgt4yml0DSKB drRDQ37X/RkZYLSrewuDEiaa7pDVvkn6gglImRU5XIURHJq8g3Dv7kJBXW4MK/yaBoVi luBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=1QsQANeqdFobJvV2MAaRL6zWG6aX2Y9RNZ6A4p9R7aA=; b=c5sqoPyt0fBZEd86lbypebCScMKqS3lw5sl3jZT5fBlo5694Hi6MWxRmXBzgyG/M+a G3VRjadu8GVwb9V5UTxu6lm2+xlXPvin0N+pY6fDPRhZcXSXDrIc1NsVF1zek3AySo+N Rq5VMNvRWisJkx2R34jMIFbEO+LmgycuAm0vhwrJ8dR/k3JyiGXS+mBVAjdAe0qMli+M eqVMuC1+8BFoti6wMwp9m4J4ua33XRv4vUmCfuwEQ8oa6AOhjUNxYS2nniQ55pJoc6fL xfvbMpu/anItiA7aAa0wWRDj8kwRM43FHkFLTJIQoQH5XppxmLW3sHpeGvb3oESSWRJV 0m6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/OnoZg2ZDubOl4FZlIaNbRNe1YdEjcX7Gx32xVm5W5HptJWz8e QO31BoEPyLN6pbFEFYJdjIOErkJ7JA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uDzydf/eTFWwJHh8BTiDgygBXcBybPFlIFtQ4uAYNZvh+BQTWMQekSgZwtF9sw0hqZiG1CMWnGCg== X-Received: from elver.muc.corp.google.com ([2a00:79e0:9c:201:3496:744e:315a:b41b]) (user=elver job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:9388:0:b0:66d:1fd9:6f73 with SMTP id a8-20020a259388000000b0066d1fd96f73mr3984902ybm.147.1656410368789; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 02:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:58:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220628095833.2579903-1-elver@google.com> Message-Id: <20220628095833.2579903-12-elver@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220628095833.2579903-1-elver@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog Subject: [PATCH v2 11/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Introduce bp_slots_histogram From: Marco Elver To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Dmitry Vyukov , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Factor out the existing `atomic_t count[N]` into its own struct called 'bp_slots_histogram', to generalize and make its intent clearer in preparation of reusing elsewhere. The basic idea of bucketing "total uses of N slots" resembles a histogram, so calling it such seems most intuitive. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver --- v2: * New patch. --- kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c index 128ba3429223..18886f115abc 100644 --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -36,19 +36,27 @@ #include /* - * Constraints data + * Datastructure to track the total uses of N slots across tasks or CPUs; + * bp_slots_histogram::count[N] is the number of assigned N+1 breakpoint slots. */ -struct bp_cpuinfo { - /* Number of pinned cpu breakpoints in a cpu */ - unsigned int cpu_pinned; - /* tsk_pinned[n] is the number of tasks having n+1 breakpoints */ +struct bp_slots_histogram { #ifdef hw_breakpoint_slots - atomic_t tsk_pinned[hw_breakpoint_slots(0)]; + atomic_t count[hw_breakpoint_slots(0)]; #else - atomic_t *tsk_pinned; + atomic_t *count; #endif }; +/* + * Per-CPU constraints data. + */ +struct bp_cpuinfo { + /* Number of pinned CPU breakpoints in a CPU. */ + unsigned int cpu_pinned; + /* Histogram of pinned task breakpoints in a CPU. */ + struct bp_slots_histogram tsk_pinned; +}; + static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bp_cpuinfo, bp_cpuinfo[TYPE_MAX]); static struct bp_cpuinfo *get_bp_info(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type) @@ -159,6 +167,18 @@ static inline int hw_breakpoint_slots_cached(int type) return __nr_bp_slots[type]; } +static __init bool +bp_slots_histogram_alloc(struct bp_slots_histogram *hist, enum bp_type_idx type) +{ + hist->count = kcalloc(hw_breakpoint_slots_cached(type), sizeof(*hist->count), GFP_KERNEL); + return hist->count; +} + +static __init void bp_slots_histogram_free(struct bp_slots_histogram *hist) +{ + kfree(hist->count); +} + static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) { int i, cpu, err_cpu; @@ -170,8 +190,7 @@ static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++) { struct bp_cpuinfo *info = get_bp_info(cpu, i); - info->tsk_pinned = kcalloc(__nr_bp_slots[i], sizeof(atomic_t), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!info->tsk_pinned) + if (!bp_slots_histogram_alloc(&info->tsk_pinned, i)) goto err; } } @@ -180,7 +199,7 @@ static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) err: for_each_possible_cpu(err_cpu) { for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++) - kfree(get_bp_info(err_cpu, i)->tsk_pinned); + bp_slots_histogram_free(&get_bp_info(err_cpu, i)->tsk_pinned); if (err_cpu == cpu) break; } @@ -189,6 +208,34 @@ static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) } #endif +static inline void +bp_slots_histogram_add(struct bp_slots_histogram *hist, int old, int val) +{ + const int old_idx = old - 1; + const int new_idx = old_idx + val; + + if (old_idx >= 0) + atomic_dec(&hist->count[old_idx]); + if (new_idx >= 0) + atomic_inc(&hist->count[new_idx]); +} + +static int +bp_slots_histogram_max(struct bp_slots_histogram *hist, enum bp_type_idx type) +{ + for (int i = hw_breakpoint_slots_cached(type) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { + const int count = atomic_read(&hist->count[i]); + + /* Catch unexpected writers; we want a stable snapshot. */ + ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(hist->count[i]); + if (count > 0) + return i + 1; + WARN(count < 0, "inconsistent breakpoint slots histogram"); + } + + return 0; +} + #ifndef hw_breakpoint_weight static inline int hw_breakpoint_weight(struct perf_event *bp) { @@ -205,13 +252,11 @@ static inline enum bp_type_idx find_slot_idx(u64 bp_type) } /* - * Report the maximum number of pinned breakpoints a task - * have in this cpu + * Return the maximum number of pinned breakpoints a task has in this CPU. */ static unsigned int max_task_bp_pinned(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type) { - atomic_t *tsk_pinned = get_bp_info(cpu, type)->tsk_pinned; - int i; + struct bp_slots_histogram *tsk_pinned = &get_bp_info(cpu, type)->tsk_pinned; /* * At this point we want to have acquired the bp_cpuinfo_sem as a @@ -219,14 +264,7 @@ static unsigned int max_task_bp_pinned(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type) * toggle_bp_task_slot() to tsk_pinned, and we get a stable snapshot. */ lockdep_assert_held_write(&bp_cpuinfo_sem); - - for (i = hw_breakpoint_slots_cached(type) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { - ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(tsk_pinned[i]); /* Catch unexpected writers. */ - if (atomic_read(&tsk_pinned[i]) > 0) - return i + 1; - } - - return 0; + return bp_slots_histogram_max(tsk_pinned, type); } /* @@ -300,8 +338,7 @@ max_bp_pinned_slots(struct perf_event *bp, enum bp_type_idx type) static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type, int weight) { - atomic_t *tsk_pinned = get_bp_info(cpu, type)->tsk_pinned; - int old_idx, new_idx; + struct bp_slots_histogram *tsk_pinned = &get_bp_info(cpu, type)->tsk_pinned; /* * If bp->hw.target, tsk_pinned is only modified, but not used @@ -311,14 +348,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, * bp_cpuinfo_sem as a writer to stabilize tsk_pinned's value. */ lockdep_assert_held_read(&bp_cpuinfo_sem); - - old_idx = task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type) - 1; - new_idx = old_idx + weight; - - if (old_idx >= 0) - atomic_dec(&tsk_pinned[old_idx]); - if (new_idx >= 0) - atomic_inc(&tsk_pinned[new_idx]); + bp_slots_histogram_add(tsk_pinned, task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type), weight); } /* -- 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8667CC43334 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LXKx80pFFz3f74 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 20:06:04 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=F4htJF5l; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=flex--elver.bounces.google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49; helo=mail-yb1-xb49.google.com; envelope-from=3ang6ygukdkknuenapxxpun.lxvurwdgyyl-mneurbcb.xiujkb.xap@flex--elver.bounces.google.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=F4htJF5l; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-yb1-xb49.google.com (mail-yb1-xb49.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LXKnb1tg8z3cDR for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:59:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb49.google.com with SMTP id s194-20020a252ccb000000b00669b5702413so10614419ybs.22 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 02:59:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=1QsQANeqdFobJvV2MAaRL6zWG6aX2Y9RNZ6A4p9R7aA=; b=F4htJF5lqfKtgcyb4cAn8IQaq74+Q2O0+ji0Ft0mREvWHOjzPQY3JSlIdKjYUUT10v CqEsNMzmJikhcWU4EN+KhQq6THyYW4S+4O5omA3EIaETGok9+fJMmrOuXXSIfU+hU5Ad LGPgHt/K10WVukeIgHuIaTmQbIIFh2gluK2rlVxO6gOAwGiD7EIshnk1p5kDYtkUk5Ge 8kJq2INdNgnWW9/2cKGlKJul/c6oJZWxeStBsMr+uLKi/Vs7LPVK/oMiRgt4yml0DSKB drRDQ37X/RkZYLSrewuDEiaa7pDVvkn6gglImRU5XIURHJq8g3Dv7kJBXW4MK/yaBoVi luBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=1QsQANeqdFobJvV2MAaRL6zWG6aX2Y9RNZ6A4p9R7aA=; b=rpRO3jb13E60f5E4SOOBuXgWVDnjLM/sSnPRNtTUmxWjengywBKj72YjmajLhmgT8e AYape5OfsvlUw78cxdy7cdgtRwcF3vTy8mfSz2oWxVeFmLGOMZQwnit3/2MIJqflmfwT K6xXxLwPOSYll1MMed+6uqkVPU4c7Tn2KZZMajAv2yHRvY2X7o8MEtGIr/0iPsnMi777 u3Nzsf1viV/zp5SGgRz4NMOILBAVKCWkeGPHHS0D1xS63u+J0qaSAxtjiLAtd6+MDI9e buzsmIq1zI/wPl2Zht89BU91qjU8gwlKFvHAjrJVWLOxApqSQV9bK+x2FgkLWSWZCygl cfGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/Md7ZpP/NB0ack+m5V606AhMR1xG+knLjN0HYi9HA5xpildhIy I8mZBlxrBG1wttYoeB+joyYBrjd4NA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uDzydf/eTFWwJHh8BTiDgygBXcBybPFlIFtQ4uAYNZvh+BQTWMQekSgZwtF9sw0hqZiG1CMWnGCg== X-Received: from elver.muc.corp.google.com ([2a00:79e0:9c:201:3496:744e:315a:b41b]) (user=elver job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:9388:0:b0:66d:1fd9:6f73 with SMTP id a8-20020a259388000000b0066d1fd96f73mr3984902ybm.147.1656410368789; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 02:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:58:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220628095833.2579903-1-elver@google.com> Message-Id: <20220628095833.2579903-12-elver@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220628095833.2579903-1-elver@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog Subject: [PATCH v2 11/13] perf/hw_breakpoint: Introduce bp_slots_histogram From: Marco Elver To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Shishkin , x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Jiri Olsa , Dmitry Vyukov Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Factor out the existing `atomic_t count[N]` into its own struct called 'bp_slots_histogram', to generalize and make its intent clearer in preparation of reusing elsewhere. The basic idea of bucketing "total uses of N slots" resembles a histogram, so calling it such seems most intuitive. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver --- v2: * New patch. --- kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c index 128ba3429223..18886f115abc 100644 --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -36,19 +36,27 @@ #include /* - * Constraints data + * Datastructure to track the total uses of N slots across tasks or CPUs; + * bp_slots_histogram::count[N] is the number of assigned N+1 breakpoint slots. */ -struct bp_cpuinfo { - /* Number of pinned cpu breakpoints in a cpu */ - unsigned int cpu_pinned; - /* tsk_pinned[n] is the number of tasks having n+1 breakpoints */ +struct bp_slots_histogram { #ifdef hw_breakpoint_slots - atomic_t tsk_pinned[hw_breakpoint_slots(0)]; + atomic_t count[hw_breakpoint_slots(0)]; #else - atomic_t *tsk_pinned; + atomic_t *count; #endif }; +/* + * Per-CPU constraints data. + */ +struct bp_cpuinfo { + /* Number of pinned CPU breakpoints in a CPU. */ + unsigned int cpu_pinned; + /* Histogram of pinned task breakpoints in a CPU. */ + struct bp_slots_histogram tsk_pinned; +}; + static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bp_cpuinfo, bp_cpuinfo[TYPE_MAX]); static struct bp_cpuinfo *get_bp_info(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type) @@ -159,6 +167,18 @@ static inline int hw_breakpoint_slots_cached(int type) return __nr_bp_slots[type]; } +static __init bool +bp_slots_histogram_alloc(struct bp_slots_histogram *hist, enum bp_type_idx type) +{ + hist->count = kcalloc(hw_breakpoint_slots_cached(type), sizeof(*hist->count), GFP_KERNEL); + return hist->count; +} + +static __init void bp_slots_histogram_free(struct bp_slots_histogram *hist) +{ + kfree(hist->count); +} + static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) { int i, cpu, err_cpu; @@ -170,8 +190,7 @@ static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++) { struct bp_cpuinfo *info = get_bp_info(cpu, i); - info->tsk_pinned = kcalloc(__nr_bp_slots[i], sizeof(atomic_t), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!info->tsk_pinned) + if (!bp_slots_histogram_alloc(&info->tsk_pinned, i)) goto err; } } @@ -180,7 +199,7 @@ static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) err: for_each_possible_cpu(err_cpu) { for (i = 0; i < TYPE_MAX; i++) - kfree(get_bp_info(err_cpu, i)->tsk_pinned); + bp_slots_histogram_free(&get_bp_info(err_cpu, i)->tsk_pinned); if (err_cpu == cpu) break; } @@ -189,6 +208,34 @@ static __init int init_breakpoint_slots(void) } #endif +static inline void +bp_slots_histogram_add(struct bp_slots_histogram *hist, int old, int val) +{ + const int old_idx = old - 1; + const int new_idx = old_idx + val; + + if (old_idx >= 0) + atomic_dec(&hist->count[old_idx]); + if (new_idx >= 0) + atomic_inc(&hist->count[new_idx]); +} + +static int +bp_slots_histogram_max(struct bp_slots_histogram *hist, enum bp_type_idx type) +{ + for (int i = hw_breakpoint_slots_cached(type) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { + const int count = atomic_read(&hist->count[i]); + + /* Catch unexpected writers; we want a stable snapshot. */ + ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(hist->count[i]); + if (count > 0) + return i + 1; + WARN(count < 0, "inconsistent breakpoint slots histogram"); + } + + return 0; +} + #ifndef hw_breakpoint_weight static inline int hw_breakpoint_weight(struct perf_event *bp) { @@ -205,13 +252,11 @@ static inline enum bp_type_idx find_slot_idx(u64 bp_type) } /* - * Report the maximum number of pinned breakpoints a task - * have in this cpu + * Return the maximum number of pinned breakpoints a task has in this CPU. */ static unsigned int max_task_bp_pinned(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type) { - atomic_t *tsk_pinned = get_bp_info(cpu, type)->tsk_pinned; - int i; + struct bp_slots_histogram *tsk_pinned = &get_bp_info(cpu, type)->tsk_pinned; /* * At this point we want to have acquired the bp_cpuinfo_sem as a @@ -219,14 +264,7 @@ static unsigned int max_task_bp_pinned(int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type) * toggle_bp_task_slot() to tsk_pinned, and we get a stable snapshot. */ lockdep_assert_held_write(&bp_cpuinfo_sem); - - for (i = hw_breakpoint_slots_cached(type) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { - ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(tsk_pinned[i]); /* Catch unexpected writers. */ - if (atomic_read(&tsk_pinned[i]) > 0) - return i + 1; - } - - return 0; + return bp_slots_histogram_max(tsk_pinned, type); } /* @@ -300,8 +338,7 @@ max_bp_pinned_slots(struct perf_event *bp, enum bp_type_idx type) static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, enum bp_type_idx type, int weight) { - atomic_t *tsk_pinned = get_bp_info(cpu, type)->tsk_pinned; - int old_idx, new_idx; + struct bp_slots_histogram *tsk_pinned = &get_bp_info(cpu, type)->tsk_pinned; /* * If bp->hw.target, tsk_pinned is only modified, but not used @@ -311,14 +348,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, * bp_cpuinfo_sem as a writer to stabilize tsk_pinned's value. */ lockdep_assert_held_read(&bp_cpuinfo_sem); - - old_idx = task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type) - 1; - new_idx = old_idx + weight; - - if (old_idx >= 0) - atomic_dec(&tsk_pinned[old_idx]); - if (new_idx >= 0) - atomic_inc(&tsk_pinned[new_idx]); + bp_slots_histogram_add(tsk_pinned, task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type), weight); } /* -- 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog