All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ext4: silence the warning when evicting inode with dioread_nolock
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:29:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220629022940.2855538-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> (raw)

When evicting an inode with default dioread_nolock, it could be raced by
the unwritten extents converting kworker after writeback some new
allocated dirty blocks. It convert unwritten extents to written, the
extents could be merged to upper level and free extent blocks, so it
could mark the inode dirty again even this inode has been marked
I_FREEING. But the inode->i_io_list check and warning in
ext4_evict_inode() missing this corner case. Fortunately,
ext4_evict_inode() will wait all extents converting finished before this
check, so it will not lead to inode use-after-free problem, every thing
is OK besides this warning. The WARN_ON_ONCE was originally designed
for finding inode use-after-free issues in advance, but if we add
current dioread_nolock case in, it will become not quite useful, so fix
this warning by just remove this check.

 ======
 WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1092 at fs/ext4/inode.c:227
 ext4_evict_inode+0x875/0xc60
 ...
 RIP: 0010:ext4_evict_inode+0x875/0xc60
 ...
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  evict+0x11c/0x2b0
  iput+0x236/0x3a0
  do_unlinkat+0x1b4/0x490
  __x64_sys_unlinkat+0x4c/0xb0
  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
 RIP: 0033:0x7fa933c1115b
 ======

rm                          kworker
                            ext4_end_io_end()
vfs_unlink()
 ext4_unlink()
                             ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec()
                              ext4_convert_unwritten_extents()
                               ext4_map_blocks()
                                ext4_ext_map_blocks()
                                 ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up()
                                  __mark_inode_dirty()
                                   check !I_FREEING
                                   locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list()
 iput()
  iput_final()
   evict()
    ext4_evict_inode()
     truncate_inode_pages_final() //wait release io_end
                                    inode_io_list_move_locked()
                             ext4_release_io_end()
     trigger WARN_ON_ONCE()

Fixes: ceff86fddae8 ("ext4: Avoid freeing inodes on dirty list")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 84c0eb55071d..702cc208689a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -220,13 +220,13 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 
 	/*
 	 * For inodes with journalled data, transaction commit could have
-	 * dirtied the inode. Flush worker is ignoring it because of I_FREEING
-	 * flag but we still need to remove the inode from the writeback lists.
+	 * dirtied the inode. And for inodes with dioread_nolock, unwritten
+	 * extents converting worker could merge extents and also have dirtied
+	 * the inode. Flush worker is ignoring it because of I_FREEING flag but
+	 * we still need to remove the inode from the writeback lists.
 	 */
-	if (!list_empty_careful(&inode->i_io_list)) {
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!ext4_should_journal_data(inode));
+	if (!list_empty_careful(&inode->i_io_list))
 		inode_io_list_del(inode);
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Protect us against freezing - iput() caller didn't have to have any
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29  2:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-29  2:29 Zhang Yi [this message]
2022-06-29  2:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: check and assert if marking an no_delete evicting inode dirty Zhang Yi
2022-06-29 10:21   ` Jan Kara
2022-06-29 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ext4: silence the warning when evicting inode with dioread_nolock Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220629022940.2855538-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --to=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.