All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: virtio: Fix broken rpmsg_probe()
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:43:18 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220629174318.GB2018382@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220608171334.730739-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com>

Hi Anup,

On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 10:43:34PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> The rpmsg_probe() is broken at the moment because virtqueue_add_inbuf()
> fails due to both virtqueues (Rx and Tx) marked as broken by the
> __vring_new_virtqueue() function. To solve this, virtio_device_ready()
> (which unbreaks queues) should be called before virtqueue_add_inbuf().
> 
> Fixes: 8b4ec69d7e09 ("virtio: harden vring IRQ")
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> index 905ac7910c98..71a64d2c7644 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> @@ -929,6 +929,9 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	/* and half is dedicated for TX */
>  	vrp->sbufs = bufs_va + total_buf_space / 2;
>  
> +	/* From this point on, we can notify and get callbacks. */
> +	virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> +

Calling virtio_device_ready() here means that virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split() can
potentially be called (by way of rpmsg_recv_done()), which will race with
virtqueue_add_inbuf().  If buffers in the virtqueue aren't available then
rpmsg_recv_done() will fail, potentially breaking remote processors' state
machines that don't expect their initial name service to fail when the "device"
has been marked as ready.

What does make me curious though is that nobody on the remoteproc mailing list
has complained about commit 8b4ec69d7e09 breaking their environment... By now,
i.e rc4, that should have happened.  Anyone from TI, ST and Xilinx care to test this on
their rig?

Thanks,
Mathieu

>  	/* set up the receive buffers */
>  	for (i = 0; i < vrp->num_bufs / 2; i++) {
>  		struct scatterlist sg;
> @@ -983,9 +986,6 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	 */
>  	notify = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vrp->rvq);
>  
> -	/* From this point on, we can notify and get callbacks. */
> -	virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> -
>  	/* tell the remote processor it can start sending messages */
>  	/*
>  	 * this might be concurrent with callbacks, but we are only
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-08 17:13 [PATCH] rpmsg: virtio: Fix broken rpmsg_probe() Anup Patel
2022-06-29 17:43 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2022-06-30  7:31   ` Anup Patel
2022-06-30 16:20   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-06-30 17:51     ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-06-30 19:20       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-30 19:20         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-01  1:22         ` Jason Wang
2022-07-01  1:22           ` Jason Wang
2022-07-01  6:16           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-01  6:16             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-04  4:35             ` Jason Wang
2022-07-04  4:35               ` Jason Wang
2022-07-04  9:44               ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-07-06  4:03                 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-06  4:03                   ` Jason Wang
2022-07-06  6:56                   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-07-08  6:19                     ` Jason Wang
2022-07-08  6:19                       ` Jason Wang
2022-07-08  8:00                       ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-07-12  8:21                         ` Jason Wang
2022-07-12  8:21                           ` Jason Wang
2022-06-30 19:19   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-01  9:00     ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-07-01  9:39       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-30 19:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220629174318.GB2018382@p14s \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.