All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com,
	wintera@linux.ibm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com,
	scgl@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v12 1/3] KVM: s390: Cleanup ipte lock access and SIIF facility checks
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:41:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220711084148.25017-2-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220711084148.25017-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>

We can check if SIIF is enabled by testing the sclp_info struct
instead of testing the sie control block eca variable as that
facility is always enabled if available.

Also let's cleanup all the ipte related struct member accesses
which currently happen by referencing the KVM struct via the
VCPU struct.
Making the KVM struct the parameter to the ipte_* functions
removes one level of indirection which makes the code more readable.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h |  6 +--
 arch/s390/kvm/priv.c    |  6 +--
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index 227ed0009354..082ec5f2c3a5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -262,77 +262,77 @@ struct aste {
 	/* .. more fields there */
 };
 
-int ipte_lock_held(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+int ipte_lock_held(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca & ECA_SII) {
+	if (sclp.has_siif) {
 		int rc;
 
-		read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
-		rc = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(vcpu->kvm)->kh != 0;
-		read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+		read_lock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+		rc = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(kvm)->kh != 0;
+		read_unlock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
 		return rc;
 	}
-	return vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count != 0;
+	return kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count != 0;
 }
 
-static void ipte_lock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void ipte_lock_simple(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	union ipte_control old, new, *ic;
 
-	mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_mutex);
-	vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count++;
-	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count > 1)
+	mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.ipte_mutex);
+	kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count++;
+	if (kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count > 1)
 		goto out;
 retry:
-	read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
-	ic = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(vcpu->kvm);
+	read_lock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+	ic = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(kvm);
 	do {
 		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		if (old.k) {
-			read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+			read_unlock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
 			cond_resched();
 			goto retry;
 		}
 		new = old;
 		new.k = 1;
 	} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
-	read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+	read_unlock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
 out:
-	mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.ipte_mutex);
 }
 
-static void ipte_unlock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void ipte_unlock_simple(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	union ipte_control old, new, *ic;
 
-	mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_mutex);
-	vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count--;
-	if (vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count)
+	mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.ipte_mutex);
+	kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count--;
+	if (kvm->arch.ipte_lock_count)
 		goto out;
-	read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
-	ic = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(vcpu->kvm);
+	read_lock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+	ic = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(kvm);
 	do {
 		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		new = old;
 		new.k = 0;
 	} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
-	read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
-	wake_up(&vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_wq);
+	read_unlock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+	wake_up(&kvm->arch.ipte_wq);
 out:
-	mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.ipte_mutex);
 }
 
-static void ipte_lock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void ipte_lock_siif(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	union ipte_control old, new, *ic;
 
 retry:
-	read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
-	ic = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(vcpu->kvm);
+	read_lock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+	ic = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(kvm);
 	do {
 		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		if (old.kg) {
-			read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+			read_unlock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
 			cond_resched();
 			goto retry;
 		}
@@ -340,15 +340,15 @@ static void ipte_lock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		new.k = 1;
 		new.kh++;
 	} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
-	read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+	read_unlock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
 }
 
-static void ipte_unlock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void ipte_unlock_siif(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	union ipte_control old, new, *ic;
 
-	read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
-	ic = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(vcpu->kvm);
+	read_lock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+	ic = kvm_s390_get_ipte_control(kvm);
 	do {
 		old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
 		new = old;
@@ -356,25 +356,25 @@ static void ipte_unlock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (!new.kh)
 			new.k = 0;
 	} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
-	read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.sca_lock);
+	read_unlock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
 	if (!new.kh)
-		wake_up(&vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_wq);
+		wake_up(&kvm->arch.ipte_wq);
 }
 
-void ipte_lock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+void ipte_lock(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca & ECA_SII)
-		ipte_lock_siif(vcpu);
+	if (sclp.has_siif)
+		ipte_lock_siif(kvm);
 	else
-		ipte_lock_simple(vcpu);
+		ipte_lock_simple(kvm);
 }
 
-void ipte_unlock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+void ipte_unlock(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca & ECA_SII)
-		ipte_unlock_siif(vcpu);
+	if (sclp.has_siif)
+		ipte_unlock_siif(kvm);
 	else
-		ipte_unlock_simple(vcpu);
+		ipte_unlock_simple(kvm);
 }
 
 static int ar_translation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, union asce *asce, u8 ar,
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ int access_guest_with_key(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, u8 ar,
 	try_storage_prot_override = storage_prot_override_applicable(vcpu);
 	need_ipte_lock = psw_bits(*psw).dat && !asce.r;
 	if (need_ipte_lock)
-		ipte_lock(vcpu);
+		ipte_lock(vcpu->kvm);
 	/*
 	 * Since we do the access further down ultimately via a move instruction
 	 * that does key checking and returns an error in case of a protection
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ int access_guest_with_key(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, u8 ar,
 	}
 out_unlock:
 	if (need_ipte_lock)
-		ipte_unlock(vcpu);
+		ipte_unlock(vcpu->kvm);
 	if (nr_pages > ARRAY_SIZE(gpa_array))
 		vfree(gpas);
 	return rc;
@@ -1199,10 +1199,10 @@ int check_gva_range(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva, u8 ar,
 	rc = get_vcpu_asce(vcpu, &asce, gva, ar, mode);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
-	ipte_lock(vcpu);
+	ipte_lock(vcpu->kvm);
 	rc = guest_range_to_gpas(vcpu, gva, ar, NULL, length, asce, mode,
 				 access_key);
-	ipte_unlock(vcpu);
+	ipte_unlock(vcpu->kvm);
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ int kvm_s390_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct gmap *sg,
 	 * tables/pointers we read stay valid - unshadowing is however
 	 * always possible - only guest_table_lock protects us.
 	 */
-	ipte_lock(vcpu);
+	ipte_lock(vcpu->kvm);
 
 	rc = gmap_shadow_pgt_lookup(sg, saddr, &pgt, &dat_protection, &fake);
 	if (rc)
@@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ int kvm_s390_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct gmap *sg,
 	pte.p |= dat_protection;
 	if (!rc)
 		rc = gmap_shadow_page(sg, saddr, __pte(pte.val));
-	ipte_unlock(vcpu);
+	ipte_unlock(vcpu->kvm);
 	mmap_read_unlock(sg->mm);
 	return rc;
 }
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
index 1124ff282012..9408d6cc8e2c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
@@ -440,9 +440,9 @@ int read_guest_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra, void *data,
 	return access_guest_real(vcpu, gra, data, len, 0);
 }
 
-void ipte_lock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-void ipte_unlock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-int ipte_lock_held(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void ipte_lock(struct kvm *kvm);
+void ipte_unlock(struct kvm *kvm);
+int ipte_lock_held(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra);
 
 /* MVPG PEI indication bits */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index 83bb5cf97282..12c464c7cddf 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static int handle_ipte_interlock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->stat.instruction_ipte_interlock++;
 	if (psw_bits(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw).pstate)
 		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
-	wait_event(vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_wq, !ipte_lock_held(vcpu));
+	wait_event(vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_wq, !ipte_lock_held(vcpu->kvm));
 	kvm_s390_retry_instr(vcpu);
 	VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 4, "%s", "retrying ipte interlock operation");
 	return 0;
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ static int handle_tprot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	access_key = (operand2 & 0xf0) >> 4;
 
 	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_DAT)
-		ipte_lock(vcpu);
+		ipte_lock(vcpu->kvm);
 
 	ret = guest_translate_address_with_key(vcpu, address, ar, &gpa,
 					       GACC_STORE, access_key);
@@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ static int handle_tprot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	}
 
 	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_DAT)
-		ipte_unlock(vcpu);
+		ipte_unlock(vcpu->kvm);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-11  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-11  8:41 [PATCH v12 0/3] s390x: KVM: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2022-07-11  8:41 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-07-11  8:41 ` [PATCH v12 2/3] KVM: s390: guest support for topology function Pierre Morel
2022-07-11 12:30   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-12  7:45     ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-12  8:50       ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-12  9:21         ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-13  8:34           ` Janosch Frank
2022-07-13  8:42             ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-11  8:41 ` [PATCH v12 3/3] KVM: s390: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2022-07-11 13:22   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-12  7:24     ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-12  8:47       ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-12 11:17         ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-13  9:01           ` Janosch Frank
2022-07-14  8:37             ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-13  9:02 ` [PATCH v12 0/3] s390x: KVM: CPU Topology Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220711084148.25017-2-pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.