All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2,bpf-next] bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len
@ 2022-07-14  6:09 Zhengchao Shao
  2022-07-14 18:22 ` Stanislav Fomichev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zhengchao Shao @ 2022-07-14  6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, netdev, linux-kernel, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, hawk
  Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs, john.fastabend,
	kpsingh, sdf, weiyongjun1, yuehaibing, shaozhengchao

Syzbot found an issue [1]: fq_codel_drop() try to drop a flow whitout any
skbs, that is, the flow->head is null.
The root cause, as the [2] says, is because that bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
run a bpf prog which redirects empty skbs.
So we should determine whether the length of the packet modified by bpf
prog is valid before forwarding it directly.

LINK: [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0b84da80c2917757915afa89f7738a9d16ec96c5
LINK: [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg777503.html

Reported-by: syzbot+7a12909485b94426aceb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
---
v1: should not check len in fast path

 net/bpf/test_run.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 2ca96acbc50a..750d7d173a20 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -1152,6 +1152,12 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 	ret = convert___skb_to_skb(skb, ctx);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
+
+	if (skb->len == 0) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration, false);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2,bpf-next] bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len
  2022-07-14  6:09 [PATCH v2,bpf-next] bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len Zhengchao Shao
@ 2022-07-14 18:22 ` Stanislav Fomichev
  2022-07-14 20:39   ` Daniel Borkmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2022-07-14 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhengchao Shao
  Cc: bpf, netdev, linux-kernel, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, hawk,
	ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs, john.fastabend,
	kpsingh, weiyongjun1, yuehaibing

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:05 PM Zhengchao Shao
<shaozhengchao@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Syzbot found an issue [1]: fq_codel_drop() try to drop a flow whitout any
> skbs, that is, the flow->head is null.
> The root cause, as the [2] says, is because that bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
> run a bpf prog which redirects empty skbs.
> So we should determine whether the length of the packet modified by bpf
> prog is valid before forwarding it directly.
>
> LINK: [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0b84da80c2917757915afa89f7738a9d16ec96c5
> LINK: [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg777503.html
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+7a12909485b94426aceb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>

Daniel, do you see any issues with this approach?

I wonder if we might also want to add some WARN_ON to the
__bpf_redirect_common routine gated by #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NET ?
In case syscaller manages to hit similar issues elsewhere..

> ---
> v1: should not check len in fast path
>
>  net/bpf/test_run.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 2ca96acbc50a..750d7d173a20 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,12 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
>         ret = convert___skb_to_skb(skb, ctx);
>         if (ret)
>                 goto out;
> +
> +       if (skb->len == 0) {
> +               ret = -EINVAL;
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
>         ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration, false);
>         if (ret)
>                 goto out;
> --
> 2.17.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2,bpf-next] bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len
  2022-07-14 18:22 ` Stanislav Fomichev
@ 2022-07-14 20:39   ` Daniel Borkmann
  2022-07-14 21:26     ` Stanislav Fomichev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2022-07-14 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Fomichev, Zhengchao Shao
  Cc: bpf, netdev, linux-kernel, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, hawk,
	ast, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs, john.fastabend, kpsingh,
	weiyongjun1, yuehaibing

On 7/14/22 8:22 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:05 PM Zhengchao Shao
> <shaozhengchao@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Syzbot found an issue [1]: fq_codel_drop() try to drop a flow whitout any
>> skbs, that is, the flow->head is null.
>> The root cause, as the [2] says, is because that bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
>> run a bpf prog which redirects empty skbs.
>> So we should determine whether the length of the packet modified by bpf
>> prog is valid before forwarding it directly.
>>
>> LINK: [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0b84da80c2917757915afa89f7738a9d16ec96c5
>> LINK: [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg777503.html
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+7a12909485b94426aceb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> 
> Daniel, do you see any issues with this approach?

I think it's fine, maybe this could be folded into:

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 750d7d173a20..256cd18cfe22 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -957,6 +957,8 @@ static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb)

         if (!__skb)
                 return 0;
+       if (!skb->len)
+               return -EINVAL;

         /* make sure the fields we don't use are zeroed */
         if (!range_is_zero(__skb, 0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)))

> I wonder if we might also want to add some WARN_ON to the
> __bpf_redirect_common routine gated by #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NET ?
> In case syscaller manages to hit similar issues elsewhere..

Assuming the issue is generic (and CONFIG_DEBUG_NET only enabled by things like
syzkaller), couldn't we do something like the below?

diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index f6a27ab19202..c9988a785294 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -2459,6 +2459,17 @@ static inline void skb_set_tail_pointer(struct sk_buff *skb, const int offset)

  #endif /* NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET */

+static inline void skb_assert_len(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NET
+       if (unlikey(!skb->len)) {
+               pr_err("%s\n", __func__);
+               skb_dump(KERN_ERR, skb, false);
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+       }
+#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_NET */
+}
+
  /*
   *     Add data to an sk_buff
   */
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 978ed0622d8f..53c4b9fd22c0 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4168,7 +4168,7 @@ int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
         bool again = false;

         skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
-
+       skb_assert_len(skb);
         if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP))
                 __skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL, NULL, skb->sk, SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED);



>> ---
>> v1: should not check len in fast path
>>
>>   net/bpf/test_run.c | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
>> index 2ca96acbc50a..750d7d173a20 100644
>> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
>> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
>> @@ -1152,6 +1152,12 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
>>          ret = convert___skb_to_skb(skb, ctx);
>>          if (ret)
>>                  goto out;
>> +
>> +       if (skb->len == 0) {
>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>> +
>>          ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration, false);
>>          if (ret)
>>                  goto out;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2,bpf-next] bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len
  2022-07-14 20:39   ` Daniel Borkmann
@ 2022-07-14 21:26     ` Stanislav Fomichev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2022-07-14 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Borkmann
  Cc: Zhengchao Shao, bpf, netdev, linux-kernel, davem, edumazet, kuba,
	pabeni, hawk, ast, andrii, martin.lau, song, yhs, john.fastabend,
	kpsingh, weiyongjun1, yuehaibing

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 1:39 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>
> On 7/14/22 8:22 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:05 PM Zhengchao Shao
> > <shaozhengchao@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Syzbot found an issue [1]: fq_codel_drop() try to drop a flow whitout any
> >> skbs, that is, the flow->head is null.
> >> The root cause, as the [2] says, is because that bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
> >> run a bpf prog which redirects empty skbs.
> >> So we should determine whether the length of the packet modified by bpf
> >> prog is valid before forwarding it directly.
> >>
> >> LINK: [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0b84da80c2917757915afa89f7738a9d16ec96c5
> >> LINK: [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg777503.html
> >>
> >> Reported-by: syzbot+7a12909485b94426aceb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> >
> > Daniel, do you see any issues with this approach?
>
> I think it's fine, maybe this could be folded into:
>
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 750d7d173a20..256cd18cfe22 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -957,6 +957,8 @@ static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb)
>
>          if (!__skb)
>                  return 0;
> +       if (!skb->len)
> +               return -EINVAL;

So putting it in convert___skb_to_skb lets us remove a goto :-) Works
for me, whichever you prefer.

>          /* make sure the fields we don't use are zeroed */
>          if (!range_is_zero(__skb, 0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)))
>
> > I wonder if we might also want to add some WARN_ON to the
> > __bpf_redirect_common routine gated by #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NET ?
> > In case syscaller manages to hit similar issues elsewhere..
>
> Assuming the issue is generic (and CONFIG_DEBUG_NET only enabled by things like
> syzkaller), couldn't we do something like the below?

Based on [1] it's selected by DEBUG_KERNEL, so it feels like it's safe
to assume that it's mostly debugging/fuzzing workloads?
Your suggestion to put it into __dev_queue_xmit looks good to me!

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220509190851.1107955-3-eric.dumazet@gmail.com/

> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index f6a27ab19202..c9988a785294 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -2459,6 +2459,17 @@ static inline void skb_set_tail_pointer(struct sk_buff *skb, const int offset)
>
>   #endif /* NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET */
>
> +static inline void skb_assert_len(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NET
> +       if (unlikey(!skb->len)) {
> +               pr_err("%s\n", __func__);
> +               skb_dump(KERN_ERR, skb, false);
> +               WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +       }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_NET */
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    *     Add data to an sk_buff
>    */
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 978ed0622d8f..53c4b9fd22c0 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -4168,7 +4168,7 @@ int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
>          bool again = false;
>
>          skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> -
> +       skb_assert_len(skb);
>          if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP))
>                  __skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL, NULL, skb->sk, SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED);
>
>
>
> >> ---
> >> v1: should not check len in fast path
> >>
> >>   net/bpf/test_run.c | 6 ++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> >> index 2ca96acbc50a..750d7d173a20 100644
> >> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> >> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> >> @@ -1152,6 +1152,12 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
> >>          ret = convert___skb_to_skb(skb, ctx);
> >>          if (ret)
> >>                  goto out;
> >> +
> >> +       if (skb->len == 0) {
> >> +               ret = -EINVAL;
> >> +               goto out;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >>          ret = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &retval, &duration, false);
> >>          if (ret)
> >>                  goto out;
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-14 21:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-14  6:09 [PATCH v2,bpf-next] bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt_len Zhengchao Shao
2022-07-14 18:22 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-07-14 20:39   ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-07-14 21:26     ` Stanislav Fomichev

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.