All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] docs: driver-api: firmware: add driver firmware guidelines.
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:05:48 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220718070548.2699395-1-airlied@redhat.com> (raw)

A recent snafu where Intel ignored upstream feedback on a firmware
change, led to a late rc6 fix being required. In order to avoid this
in the future we should document some expectations around
linux-firmware.

I was originally going to write this for drm, but it seems quite generic
advice.

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst    |  1 +
 .../firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst    | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst
index 1d1688cbc078..803cd574bbd7 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst
@@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ documents these features.
    direct-fs-lookup
    fallback-mechanisms
    lookup-order
+   firmware-usage-guidelines
 
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..34d2412e78c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+===================
+Firmware Guidelines
+===================
+
+Drivers that use firmware from linux-firmware should attempt to follow
+the rules in this guide.
+
+* Firmware should be versioned with at least a major/minor version. It
+  is suggested that the firmware files in linux-firmware be named with
+  some device specific name, and just the major version. The
+  major/minor/patch versions should be stored in a header in the
+  firmware file for the driver to detect any non-ABI fixes/issues. The
+  firmware files in linux-firmware should be overwritten with the newest
+  compatible major version. Newer major version firmware should remain
+  compatible with all kernels that load that major number.
+
+* Users should *not* have to install newer firmware to use existing
+  hardware when they install a newer kernel.  If the hardware isn't
+  enabled by default or under development, this can be ignored, until
+  the first kernel release that enables that hardware.  This means no
+  major version bumps without the kernel retaining backwards
+  compatibility for the older major versions.  Minor version bumps
+  should not introduce new features that newer kernels depend on
+  non-optionally.
+
+* If a security fix needs lockstep firmware and kernel fixes in order to
+  be successful, then all supported major versions in the linux-firmware
+  repo should be updated with the security fix, and the kernel patches
+  should detect if the firmware is new enough to declare if the security
+  issue is fixed.  All communications around security fixes should point
+  at both the firmware and kernel fixes. If a security fix requires
+  deprecating old major versions, then this should only be done as a
+  last option, and be stated clearly in all communications.
+
-- 
2.36.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net
Subject: [PATCH] docs: driver-api: firmware: add driver firmware guidelines.
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:05:48 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220718070548.2699395-1-airlied@redhat.com> (raw)

A recent snafu where Intel ignored upstream feedback on a firmware
change, led to a late rc6 fix being required. In order to avoid this
in the future we should document some expectations around
linux-firmware.

I was originally going to write this for drm, but it seems quite generic
advice.

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst    |  1 +
 .../firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst    | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst
index 1d1688cbc078..803cd574bbd7 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/core.rst
@@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ documents these features.
    direct-fs-lookup
    fallback-mechanisms
    lookup-order
+   firmware-usage-guidelines
 
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..34d2412e78c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+===================
+Firmware Guidelines
+===================
+
+Drivers that use firmware from linux-firmware should attempt to follow
+the rules in this guide.
+
+* Firmware should be versioned with at least a major/minor version. It
+  is suggested that the firmware files in linux-firmware be named with
+  some device specific name, and just the major version. The
+  major/minor/patch versions should be stored in a header in the
+  firmware file for the driver to detect any non-ABI fixes/issues. The
+  firmware files in linux-firmware should be overwritten with the newest
+  compatible major version. Newer major version firmware should remain
+  compatible with all kernels that load that major number.
+
+* Users should *not* have to install newer firmware to use existing
+  hardware when they install a newer kernel.  If the hardware isn't
+  enabled by default or under development, this can be ignored, until
+  the first kernel release that enables that hardware.  This means no
+  major version bumps without the kernel retaining backwards
+  compatibility for the older major versions.  Minor version bumps
+  should not introduce new features that newer kernels depend on
+  non-optionally.
+
+* If a security fix needs lockstep firmware and kernel fixes in order to
+  be successful, then all supported major versions in the linux-firmware
+  repo should be updated with the security fix, and the kernel patches
+  should detect if the firmware is new enough to declare if the security
+  issue is fixed.  All communications around security fixes should point
+  at both the firmware and kernel fixes. If a security fix requires
+  deprecating old major versions, then this should only be done as a
+  last option, and be stated clearly in all communications.
+
-- 
2.36.1



--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-18  7:05 Dave Airlie [this message]
2022-07-18  7:05 ` [PATCH] docs: driver-api: firmware: add driver firmware guidelines Dave Airlie
2022-07-18  7:21 Dave Airlie
2022-07-18  7:21 ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-18  7:21 ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-18  9:33 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-07-18  9:33   ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-07-18 22:04   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-18 22:04     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-19  0:33     ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-19  0:33       ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-19  0:33       ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-18 17:54 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-07-18 17:54   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-07-19  0:29   ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-19  0:29     ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-19  0:29     ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-19 14:49     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-07-19 14:49       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-07-18 22:00 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-07-18 22:00   ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220718070548.2699395-1-airlied@redhat.com \
    --to=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.