[PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins

From: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [PATCH] libusb1: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:00:36 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727120036.633822-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br> (raw)

Backport a fix from 1.0.27 so we only link atomic if no atomic builtins
are available.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
---
 ...k-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.26.bb |  1 +
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1/0001-configure.ac-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1/0001-configure.ac-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch b/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1/0001-configure.ac-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..7c20dc0478
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1/0001-configure.ac-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+From a6890a6a9a8f88b567631874e209aaadc79e28e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Lonnie Abelbeck <lonnie@abelbeck.com>
+Date: Sun, 8 May 2022 14:05:56 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] configure.ac: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins
+
+Follow-up to 561dbda, a check of GCC atomic builtins needs to be done
+first.
+
+I'm no autoconf guru, but using this:
+https://github.com/mesa3d/mesa/blob/0df485c285b73c34ba9062f0c27e55c3c702930d/configure.ac#L469
+as inspiration, I created a pre-check before calling AC_SEARCH_LIBS(...)
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [1.0.27]
+
+Fixes #1135
+Closes #1139
+(cherry picked from commit 95e601ce116dd46ea7915c171976b85ea0905d58)
+---
+ configure.ac | 16 +++++++++++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
+index d4f12510..96787500 100644
+--- a/configure.ac
++++ b/configure.ac
+@@ -153,7 +153,21 @@ if test "x$platform" = xposix; then
+ 	AC_SEARCH_LIBS([pthread_create], [pthread],
+ 		[test "x$ac_cv_search_pthread_create" != "xnone required" && AC_SUBST(THREAD_LIBS, [-lpthread])],
+ 		[], [])
+-	AC_SEARCH_LIBS([__atomic_fetch_add_4], [atomic])
++	dnl Check for new-style atomic builtins. We first check without linking to -latomic.
++	AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether __atomic_load_n is supported)
++	AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[
++	#include <stdint.h>
++	int main() {
++		struct {
++			uint64_t *v;
++		} x;
++		return (int)__atomic_load_n(x.v, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) &
++		       (int)__atomic_add_fetch(x.v, (uint64_t)1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL);
++	}]])], GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED=yes, GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED=no)
++	AC_MSG_RESULT($GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED)
++	if test "x$GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED" != xyes; then
++		AC_SEARCH_LIBS([__atomic_fetch_add_4], [atomic])
++	fi
+ elif test "x$platform" = xwindows; then
+ 	AC_DEFINE([PLATFORM_WINDOWS], [1], [Define to 1 if compiling for a Windows platform.])
+ else
+-- 
+2.37.0
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.26.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.26.bb
index fd63e7adc2..ff3f0be7a5 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.26.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.26.bb
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=fbc093901857fcd118f065f900982c24"
 BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
 
 SRC_URI = "https://github.com/libusb/libusb/releases/download/v${PV}/libusb-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
+           file://0001-configure.ac-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch \
            file://run-ptest \
           "
 
-- 
2.37.0


