From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AA93C00140 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 15:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C9D83F17; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 15:46:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 79C9D83F17 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSUp7hX4UMgw; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 15:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7AB83F15; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 15:46:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 9F7AB83F15 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A02D1BF867 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 15:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AE041CB6 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 15:46:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org D9AE041CB6 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PXZWAFHznE_X for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 15:46:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 84125409F8 Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::13]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84125409F8 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 15:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ymorin.is-a-geek.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:cb19:8b51:cb00:5864:4f9d:d5e2:80b0]) (Authenticated sender: yann.morin.1998@free.fr) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8565B19F749; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 17:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ymorin.is-a-geek.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 05 Aug 2022 17:46:38 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 17:46:38 +0200 From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: Joel Stanley Message-ID: <20220805154638.GA3621445@scaer> References: <20220729000904.1295295-1-joel@jms.id.au> <20220729000904.1295295-2-joel@jms.id.au> <20220729211755.GE1554632@scaer> <20220803232221.691911fe@windsurf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1659714406; bh=HxiR9g2PhrnOQ9JS9zOSmvzaLZTKyqDo0kE+NxawHPQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Jts5M3hfPnbwnPiAzEjUD8CwRupZIXaULbXRTLjNsScNrWG4D//RjKTYD5AoHoFeF 6iEZcdyr4KfX2xzSw9vZr+ULmE8+7/LMZg4KVdIhnBIvjO1fz0uGo5S4fV1MV1bpaw rE9WuLaOGH+TuX5EmagwXJU8BArtFCOZwZrog1kgfggNoZDtyhd5dagNsBiFJFtxjG ckeJzuIl/KpX7U8m5JOraVofnswlwxHYp/5xoqdn4B56xzBzJEZyaC9wGgLYzQXTEc 2UOfvYWmJWuKFUUWprQGaISlobRzCFAqsOdjwz+tu8yk+OKpl3egn7Hsp11eVufgWM jksU6Yntp6lcw== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=smtp-20201208 header.b=Jts5M3hf Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/9] arch/powerpc: Hide SPE ABI behind CPU type X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Bernd Kuhls , Michael Ellerman , =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Le Goater , Thomas Petazzoni , buildroot@buildroot.org, Romain Naour Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Joel, All, On 2022-08-05 06:05 +0000, Joel Stanley spake thusly: > On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 21:22, Thomas Petazzoni > wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 23:17:55 +0200 > > "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: [--SNIP--] > > > So we should just drop the choice altogether, and use the SPE ABI when > > > the CPu has SPE. [--SNIP--] > > and SPE is no longer supported by upstream GCC. For now, we have kept > > GCC 8.x around just to support this SPE ABI, but it is clearly not a > > future proof solution. > > Can we drop support for SPE entirely? > I vote for dropping support. Given the lack of GCC support it's only a > matter of time before our hand would be forced. That's totally fine by me, too, with a commit log that summarises this discussion of course! ;-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot