From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8FCC19F2D for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC0C60C1D; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:54:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 2AC0C60C1D X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EOZW9lSKG32L; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578AE60BEC; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:54:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 578AE60BEC Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02E91BF3DA for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7F141695 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:54:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 9A7F141695 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jb7KNu81DQuo for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:54:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 3D18C41684 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::225]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D18C41684 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 269E01C0004; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 12:54:24 +0200 To: Julien Olivain Message-ID: <20220813125424.6caa746b@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20220813093627.369221-1-ju.o@free.fr> References: <20220813093627.369221-1-ju.o@free.fr> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1660388066; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VLRvZwWCVsS3cMsLo5Wh/JVWKOMn/J9RXEohqPh7EFM=; b=Gu/No1g8UZOOf6Kl70HBzR1T+my/Jz7pmGcO69C9HD1BPmickHZZlXcaJ6/Vcbnl32nume NsroeTT+5Npv8PMn2iS2T6WrkMZVH6Dihzhi2g6R8+tb2sAGWS7Updvjh3qFurpGi2hjAL OvHu9RP1YndImNaGsq4R67tvkXi63zENmSINOQ6QvvtWEzuDr/JxtZPIyzCT9HHdl+gcq5 g6u7xn4dYWuPk7ecjrcmsRduqyT9nOHOCKTbFxPBZ2EC0RW37MEPjZRh5DoLj6QdFWQOhg NOm71gEHyVMDEg3N5+eBm+heRMo5239rX3tpYAHtBidq7omR4D5fNHUtAmlo6g== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=Gu/No1g8 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH next 1/1] package/linux-backports: bump version to 5.15.58 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Julien, On Sat, 13 Aug 2022 11:36:27 +0200 Julien Olivain wrote: > This commit also change the minimal supported kernel version from 3.10 > to 4.4. See [1]. Could this be problematic for some of our users? Do we want to keep support for an older linux-backports release to still support 3.10 kernels? I can imagine that the people who end up using linux-backports are probably stuck with an old kernel for some reason, so raising the minimum kernel version required to use linux-backports is probably something we should do with a bit of care? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot