From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0C6DC00140 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EEF817B5; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:39:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 80EEF817B5 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ceKy2Zzzp-RF; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64678176E; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:39:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org C64678176E Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD2A1BF3CB for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B828176E for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:39:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 72B828176E X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o-pJcPBAyARK for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:39:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 4F27681768 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F27681768 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 674F4240003; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:39:15 +0200 To: "Yann E. MORIN" Message-ID: <20220815113915.33c6816b@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20220814202300.GM2854108@scaer> References: <20220813093627.369221-1-ju.o@free.fr> <20220813125424.6caa746b@windsurf> <20220814202300.GM2854108@scaer> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1660556356; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=n6z4n2V/9ycO8FqfM2oeKUajyUEMhRLLG9mpAMNJIQM=; b=D5Hr1iv0iyELtdzjBEyVubmOsJpaA2NZusrrdZhljvlN1fmo/SF2KlSXEfz7zJNWf43n4x mRCSx+mKZ1sgfzvNWDbsZgHUjUuNt4my6k/Kxe1YMRzJuwuKE4Nhir7cLeSSgIiN1wI//1 CA1wtdgvN9qlOXOHrOM1/J4K97IjkvmZYZw2zxr/tVIH+PoFhUzcTuF3wwGJthQEQ1Fq1g pJhwahNRf2BoT7O4ZMMj6fNNzH1/zblqp7Z33mvOXovR7Py4lpEQJ2H/Bz//qremhLs47V wq4sa2A6syPWXOZOxiW9GYmO7lMwOBr3sG4fYrDvEGJ0i3fiqjbI7y+JSUDpHg== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=D5Hr1iv0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH next 1/1] package/linux-backports: bump version to 5.15.58 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Julien Olivain , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:23:00 +0200 "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > But then, one could argue that this is the same with other packages that > get requirements on newer kernel headers (and thus probably about newer > running kernel). We can't hold back forever. True. But even systemd only requires 3.13, which is much older than the minimum 4.4 kernel that would be required by this linux-backports update. > The alternate solution is not great: we could add a version choice: > > config BR2_PKG_LNX_BACKPORTS_5_15_X > bool "5.15.x (for kernels back to 4.4)" > > config BR2_PKG_LNX_BACKPORTS_5_8_X > bool "5.8.x (for kernels back to 3.10)" > > But this is not ideal... :-/ That is the sort of solution that I was thinking of, indeed. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot