All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
To: ast@kernel.org
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Simplify code by using for_each_cpu_wrap()
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:08:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220817130807.68279-1-punit.agrawal@bytedance.com> (raw)

In the percpu freelist code, it is a common pattern to iterate over
the possible CPUs mask starting with the current CPU. The pattern is
implemented using a hand rolled while loop with the loop variable
increment being open-coded.

Simplify the code by replacing the while() loops with
for_each_cpu_wrap() helper to iterate over the possible cpus starting
with the current CPU. As a result, some of the special-casing in the
loop also gets simplified.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
---
Hi,

I noticed an opportunity for simplifying the code while reviewing a
backport for one of the commits in this area.

Please consider merging.

Thanks,
Punit

 kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c | 42 ++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c
index 00b874c8e889..9dd9201c6f07 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c
@@ -56,10 +56,9 @@ static inline bool pcpu_freelist_try_push_extra(struct pcpu_freelist *s,
 static inline void ___pcpu_freelist_push_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s,
 					     struct pcpu_freelist_node *node)
 {
-	int cpu, orig_cpu;
+	int cpu;
 
-	orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-	while (1) {
+	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, raw_smp_processor_id()) {
 		struct pcpu_freelist_head *head;
 
 		head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
@@ -68,15 +67,10 @@ static inline void ___pcpu_freelist_push_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s,
 			raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
 			return;
 		}
-		cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
-		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			cpu = 0;
-
-		/* cannot lock any per cpu lock, try extralist */
-		if (cpu == orig_cpu &&
-		    pcpu_freelist_try_push_extra(s, node))
-			return;
 	}
+
+	/* cannot lock any per cpu lock, try extralist */
+	pcpu_freelist_try_push_extra(s, node);
 }
 
 void __pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *s,
@@ -125,13 +119,12 @@ static struct pcpu_freelist_node *___pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
 {
 	struct pcpu_freelist_head *head;
 	struct pcpu_freelist_node *node;
-	int orig_cpu, cpu;
+	int cpu;
 
-	orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-	while (1) {
+	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, raw_smp_processor_id()) {
 		head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
 		if (!READ_ONCE(head->first))
-			goto next_cpu;
+			continue;
 		raw_spin_lock(&head->lock);
 		node = head->first;
 		if (node) {
@@ -140,12 +133,6 @@ static struct pcpu_freelist_node *___pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
 			return node;
 		}
 		raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
-next_cpu:
-		cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
-		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			cpu = 0;
-		if (cpu == orig_cpu)
-			break;
 	}
 
 	/* per cpu lists are all empty, try extralist */
@@ -164,13 +151,12 @@ ___pcpu_freelist_pop_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
 {
 	struct pcpu_freelist_head *head;
 	struct pcpu_freelist_node *node;
-	int orig_cpu, cpu;
+	int cpu;
 
-	orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-	while (1) {
+	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, raw_smp_processor_id()) {
 		head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
 		if (!READ_ONCE(head->first))
-			goto next_cpu;
+			continue;
 		if (raw_spin_trylock(&head->lock)) {
 			node = head->first;
 			if (node) {
@@ -180,12 +166,6 @@ ___pcpu_freelist_pop_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
 			}
 			raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
 		}
-next_cpu:
-		cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
-		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			cpu = 0;
-		if (cpu == orig_cpu)
-			break;
 	}
 
 	/* cannot pop from per cpu lists, try extralist */
-- 
2.35.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-17 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-17 13:08 Punit Agrawal [this message]
2022-08-17 16:41 ` [PATCH] bpf: Simplify code by using for_each_cpu_wrap() Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-17 16:57   ` Punit Agrawal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220817130807.68279-1-punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
    --to=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.