From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE19C32793 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233979AbiHVIa5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:30:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38614 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234296AbiHVIas (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:30:48 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5488F2870A; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 01:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 27M8UiAb017963; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:30:44 +0200 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:30:44 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Qu Wenruo Cc: Greg KH , stable , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LTS kernel Linux 4.14.290 unable to boot with edk2-ovmf (x86_64 UEFI runtime) Message-ID: <20220822083044.GC17080@1wt.eu> References: <2d6012e8-805d-4225-80ed-d317c28f1899@gmx.com> <1ed5a33a-b667-0e8e-e010-b4365f3713d6@gmx.com> <8aff5c17-d414-2412-7269-c9d15f574037@gmx.com> <20220822080456.GB17080@1wt.eu> <4c42af33-dc05-315a-87d9-be0747a74df4@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4c42af33-dc05-315a-87d9-be0747a74df4@gmx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 04:19:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > Regardless, if you need an older compiler, just use these ones: > > > > https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ > > > > They go back to 4.9.4 for x86, you'll surely find the right one for your > > usage. I've long used 4.7.4 for kernels up to 4.9 and 6.5 for 4.19 and > > above, so something within that area will surely match your needs. > > BTW, it would be way more awesome if the page can provide some hint on > the initial release date of the compilers. > > It would help a lot of choose the toolchain then. It wouldn't help, if you look closely, you'll notice that in the "other releases" section you have the most recent version of each of them. That does not preclude the existence of the branch earlier. For example gcc-9 was released in 2019 and 9.5 was emitted 3 years later. That's quite an amplitude that doesn't help. Willy