All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@vger.kernel.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 28/31] ACPI: video: Drop "Samsung X360" acpi_backlight=native quirk
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-29-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

acpi_backlight=native is the default for the "Samsung X360", but as
the comment explains the quirk was still necessary because even
briefly registering the acpi_video0 backlight; and then unregistering
it once the native driver showed up, was leading to issues.

After the "ACPI: video: Make backlight class device registration
a separate step" patch from earlier in this patch-series, we no
longer briefly register the acpi_video0 backlight on systems where
the native driver should be used.

So this is no longer an issue an the quirk is no longer needed.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 67a0211c07b4..af2833b57b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -132,21 +132,6 @@ static int video_detect_force_none(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
 }
 
 static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
-	/* On Samsung X360, the BIOS will set a flag (VDRV) if generic
-	 * ACPI backlight device is used. This flag will definitively break
-	 * the backlight interface (even the vendor interface) until next
-	 * reboot. It's why we should prevent video.ko from being used here
-	 * and we can't rely on a later call to acpi_video_unregister().
-	 */
-	{
-	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-	 /* X360 */
-	 .matches = {
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "X360"),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "X360"),
-		},
-	},
 	{
 	 /* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128309 */
 	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-- 
2.37.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@freedesktop.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 28/31] ACPI: video: Drop "Samsung X360" acpi_backlight=native quirk
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-29-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

acpi_backlight=native is the default for the "Samsung X360", but as
the comment explains the quirk was still necessary because even
briefly registering the acpi_video0 backlight; and then unregistering
it once the native driver showed up, was leading to issues.

After the "ACPI: video: Make backlight class device registration
a separate step" patch from earlier in this patch-series, we no
longer briefly register the acpi_video0 backlight on systems where
the native driver should be used.

So this is no longer an issue an the quirk is no longer needed.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 67a0211c07b4..af2833b57b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -132,21 +132,6 @@ static int video_detect_force_none(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
 }
 
 static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
-	/* On Samsung X360, the BIOS will set a flag (VDRV) if generic
-	 * ACPI backlight device is used. This flag will definitively break
-	 * the backlight interface (even the vendor interface) until next
-	 * reboot. It's why we should prevent video.ko from being used here
-	 * and we can't rely on a later call to acpi_video_unregister().
-	 */
-	{
-	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-	 /* X360 */
-	 .matches = {
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "X360"),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "X360"),
-		},
-	},
 	{
 	 /* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128309 */
 	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-- 
2.37.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@freedesktop.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 28/31] ACPI: video: Drop "Samsung X360" acpi_backlight=native quirk
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-29-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

acpi_backlight=native is the default for the "Samsung X360", but as
the comment explains the quirk was still necessary because even
briefly registering the acpi_video0 backlight; and then unregistering
it once the native driver showed up, was leading to issues.

After the "ACPI: video: Make backlight class device registration
a separate step" patch from earlier in this patch-series, we no
longer briefly register the acpi_video0 backlight on systems where
the native driver should be used.

So this is no longer an issue an the quirk is no longer needed.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 67a0211c07b4..af2833b57b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -132,21 +132,6 @@ static int video_detect_force_none(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
 }
 
 static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
-	/* On Samsung X360, the BIOS will set a flag (VDRV) if generic
-	 * ACPI backlight device is used. This flag will definitively break
-	 * the backlight interface (even the vendor interface) until next
-	 * reboot. It's why we should prevent video.ko from being used here
-	 * and we can't rely on a later call to acpi_video_unregister().
-	 */
-	{
-	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-	 /* X360 */
-	 .matches = {
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "X360"),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "X360"),
-		},
-	},
 	{
 	 /* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128309 */
 	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-- 
2.37.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@freedesktop.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 28/31] ACPI: video: Drop "Samsung X360" acpi_backlight=native quirk
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-29-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

acpi_backlight=native is the default for the "Samsung X360", but as
the comment explains the quirk was still necessary because even
briefly registering the acpi_video0 backlight; and then unregistering
it once the native driver showed up, was leading to issues.

After the "ACPI: video: Make backlight class device registration
a separate step" patch from earlier in this patch-series, we no
longer briefly register the acpi_video0 backlight on systems where
the native driver should be used.

So this is no longer an issue an the quirk is no longer needed.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 67a0211c07b4..af2833b57b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -132,21 +132,6 @@ static int video_detect_force_none(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
 }
 
 static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
-	/* On Samsung X360, the BIOS will set a flag (VDRV) if generic
-	 * ACPI backlight device is used. This flag will definitively break
-	 * the backlight interface (even the vendor interface) until next
-	 * reboot. It's why we should prevent video.ko from being used here
-	 * and we can't rely on a later call to acpi_video_unregister().
-	 */
-	{
-	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-	 /* X360 */
-	 .matches = {
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "X360"),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "X360"),
-		},
-	},
 	{
 	 /* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128309 */
 	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-- 
2.37.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@freedesktop.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 28/31] ACPI: video: Drop "Samsung X360" acpi_backlight=native quirk
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-29-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

acpi_backlight=native is the default for the "Samsung X360", but as
the comment explains the quirk was still necessary because even
briefly registering the acpi_video0 backlight; and then unregistering
it once the native driver showed up, was leading to issues.

After the "ACPI: video: Make backlight class device registration
a separate step" patch from earlier in this patch-series, we no
longer briefly register the acpi_video0 backlight on systems where
the native driver should be used.

So this is no longer an issue an the quirk is no longer needed.

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 67a0211c07b4..af2833b57b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -132,21 +132,6 @@ static int video_detect_force_none(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
 }
 
 static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
-	/* On Samsung X360, the BIOS will set a flag (VDRV) if generic
-	 * ACPI backlight device is used. This flag will definitively break
-	 * the backlight interface (even the vendor interface) until next
-	 * reboot. It's why we should prevent video.ko from being used here
-	 * and we can't rely on a later call to acpi_video_unregister().
-	 */
-	{
-	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-	 /* X360 */
-	 .matches = {
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "X360"),
-		DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "X360"),
-		},
-	},
 	{
 	 /* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128309 */
 	 .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
-- 
2.37.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 300+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-25 14:36 [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 00/31] drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 01/31] ACPI: video: Add acpi_video_backlight_use_native() helper Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 02/31] drm/i915: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-09-25 23:39   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-09-25 23:39     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-09-25 23:39     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-09-25 23:39     ` [Nouveau] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-09-27 11:04     ` Hans de Goede
2022-09-27 11:04       ` Hans de Goede
2022-09-27 11:04       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-09-27 11:04       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-24 20:30       ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-24 20:30         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-24 20:30         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-24 20:30         ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-24 20:30         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 18:50         ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 18:50           ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 18:50           ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 18:50           ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 18:50           ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 19:32           ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 19:32             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 19:32             ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 19:32             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 19:32             ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:25             ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:25               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:25               ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:25               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:25               ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:31               ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:31                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:31                 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:31                 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:31                 ` [Nouveau] " Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:32               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:32                 ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:32                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:32                 ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:32                 ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:40               ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:40                 ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:40                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:40                 ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:40                 ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:27                 ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:27                   ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:27                   ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:27                   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:27                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:40                   ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:40                     ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:40                     ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:40                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:40                     ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26  9:59                     ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-26  9:59                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-26  9:59                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-26  9:59                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-26  9:59                       ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-26 20:49                       ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26 20:49                         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26 20:49                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26 20:49                         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26 20:49                         ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  8:51                         ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  8:51                           ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  8:51                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  8:51                           ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  8:51                           ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:11                           ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:11                             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:11                             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:11                             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:11                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:39                             ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:39                               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:39                               ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:39                               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:39                               ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:52                               ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:52                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:52                                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:52                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:52                                 ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27 10:37                                 ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 10:37                                   ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 10:37                                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 10:37                                   ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 10:37                                   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:09                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:09                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:09                                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:09                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:09                                     ` [Nouveau] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:17                                     ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:17                                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:17                                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:17                                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:17                                       ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:19                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:19                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:19                                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:19                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:19                                         ` [Nouveau] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-04 16:23                                     ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-04 16:23                                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-04 16:23                                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-11-04 16:23                                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-04 16:23                                       ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 03/31] drm/amdgpu: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v3) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [PATCH v5 04/31] drm/radeon: " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/31] drm/nouveau: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 06/31] ACPI: video: Drop backlight_device_get_by_type() call from acpi_video_get_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 07/31] ACPI: video: Remove acpi_video_bus from list before tearing it down Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/31] ACPI: video: Simplify acpi_video_unregister_backlight() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 09/31] ACPI: video: Make backlight class device registration a separate step (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/31] ACPI: video: Remove code to unregister acpi_video backlight when a native backlight registers Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/31] drm/i915: Call acpi_video_register_backlight() (v3) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-09-02 13:20   ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 13:20     ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 13:20     ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 13:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 13:20     ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/31] drm/nouveau: Register ACPI video backlight when nv_backlight registration fails (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/31] drm/amdgpu: Register ACPI video backlight when skipping amdgpu backlight registration Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 14/31] drm/radeon: Register ACPI video backlight when skipping radeon " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 15/31] platform/x86: nvidia-wmi-ec-backlight: Move fw interface definitions to a header (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 22:11   ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:11     ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:11     ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:11     ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 16/31] ACPI: video: Refactor acpi_video_get_backlight_type() a bit Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 17/31] ACPI: video: Add Nvidia WMI EC brightness control detection (v3) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 22:21   ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:21     ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:21     ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:21     ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 11:41     ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 11:41       ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 11:41       ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 11:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 11:41       ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 16:43       ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 16:43         ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 16:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 16:43         ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 16:43         ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 18/31] ACPI: video: Add Apple GMUX brightness control detection Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 19/31] platform/x86: nvidia-wmi-ec-backlight: Use acpi_video_get_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 20/31] platform/x86: apple-gmux: Stop calling acpi/video.h functions Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 21/31] platform/x86: toshiba_acpi: Stop using acpi_video_set_dmi_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 22/31] platform/x86: acer-wmi: Move backlight DMI quirks to acpi/video_detect.c Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 23/31] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Drop DMI chassis-type check from backlight handling Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 24/31] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Move acpi_backlight=vendor quirks to ACPI video_detect.c Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 25/31] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Move acpi_backlight=native " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 26/31] platform/x86: samsung-laptop: Move acpi_backlight=[vendor|native] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 27/31] ACPI: video: Remove acpi_video_set_dmi_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [PATCH v5 28/31] ACPI: video: Drop "Samsung X360" acpi_backlight=native quirk Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 29/31] ACPI: video: Drop NL5x?U, PF4NU1F and PF5?U?? acpi_backlight=native quirks Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 30/31] ACPI: video: Fix indentation of video_detect_dmi_table[] entries Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 31/31] drm/todo: Add entry about dealing with brightness control on devices with > 1 panel Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display Patchwork
2022-08-25 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-08-25 16:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-08-29 22:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-09-27 17:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display (rev2) Patchwork
2022-10-25 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display (rev3) Patchwork
2022-10-26  0:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display (rev4) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220825143726.269890-29-hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=Pan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ddadap@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=markgross@kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.