All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@vger.kernel.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 31/31] drm/todo: Add entry about dealing with brightness control on devices with > 1 panel
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-32-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

Add an entry summarizing the discussion about dealing with brightness
control on devices with more then 1 internal panel.

The original discussion can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220517152331.16217-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
index 7634c27ac562..393d218e4a0c 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
@@ -679,6 +679,74 @@ Contact: Sam Ravnborg
 
 Level: Advanced
 
+Brightness handling on devices with multiple internal panels
+============================================================
+
+On x86/ACPI devices there can be multiple backlight firmware interfaces:
+(ACPI) video, vendor specific and others. As well as direct/native (PWM)
+register programming by the KMS driver.
+
+To deal with this backlight drivers used on x86/ACPI call
+acpi_video_get_backlight_type() which has heuristics (+quirks) to select
+which backlight interface to use; and backlight drivers which do not match
+the returned type will not register themselves, so that only one backlight
+device gets registered (in a single GPU setup, see below).
+
+At the moment this more or less assumes that there will only
+be 1 (internal) panel on a system.
+
+On systems with 2 panels this may be a problem, depending on
+what interface acpi_video_get_backlight_type() selects:
+
+1. native: in this case the KMS driver is expected to know which backlight
+   device belongs to which output so everything should just work.
+2. video: this does support controlling multiple backlights, but some work
+   will need to be done to get the output <-> backlight device mapping
+
+The above assumes both panels will require the same backlight interface type.
+Things will break on systems with multiple panels where the 2 panels need
+a different type of control. E.g. one panel needs ACPI video backlight control,
+where as the other is using native backlight control. Currently in this case
+only one of the 2 required backlight devices will get registered, based on
+the acpi_video_get_backlight_type() return value.
+
+If this (theoretical) case ever shows up, then supporting this will need some
+work. A possible solution here would be to pass a device and connector-name
+to acpi_video_get_backlight_type() so that it can deal with this.
+
+Note in a way we already have a case where userspace sees 2 panels,
+in dual GPU laptop setups with a mux. On those systems we may see
+either 2 native backlight devices; or 2 native backlight devices.
+
+Userspace already has code to deal with this by detecting if the related
+panel is active (iow which way the mux between the GPU and the panels
+points) and then uses that backlight device. Userspace here very much
+assumes a single panel though. It picks only 1 of the 2 backlight devices
+and then only uses that one.
+
+Note that all userspace code (that I know off) is currently hardcoded
+to assume a single panel.
+
+Before the recent changes to not register multiple (e.g. video + native)
+/sys/class/backlight devices for a single panel (on a single GPU laptop),
+userspace would see multiple backlight devices all controlling the same
+backlight.
+
+To deal with this userspace had to always picks one preferred device under
+/sys/class/backlight and will ignore the others. So to support brightness
+control on multiple panels userspace will need to be updated too.
+
+There are plans to allow brightness control through the KMS API by adding
+a "display brightness" property to drm_connector objects for panels. This
+solves a number of issues with the /sys/class/backlight API, including not
+being able to map a sysfs backlight device to a specific connector. Any
+userspace changes to add support for brightness control on devices with
+multiple panels really should build on top of this new KMS property.
+
+Contact: Hans de Goede
+
+Level: Advanced
+
 Outside DRM
 ===========
 
-- 
2.37.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@freedesktop.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 31/31] drm/todo: Add entry about dealing with brightness control on devices with > 1 panel
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-32-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

Add an entry summarizing the discussion about dealing with brightness
control on devices with more then 1 internal panel.

The original discussion can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220517152331.16217-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
index 7634c27ac562..393d218e4a0c 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
@@ -679,6 +679,74 @@ Contact: Sam Ravnborg
 
 Level: Advanced
 
+Brightness handling on devices with multiple internal panels
+============================================================
+
+On x86/ACPI devices there can be multiple backlight firmware interfaces:
+(ACPI) video, vendor specific and others. As well as direct/native (PWM)
+register programming by the KMS driver.
+
+To deal with this backlight drivers used on x86/ACPI call
+acpi_video_get_backlight_type() which has heuristics (+quirks) to select
+which backlight interface to use; and backlight drivers which do not match
+the returned type will not register themselves, so that only one backlight
+device gets registered (in a single GPU setup, see below).
+
+At the moment this more or less assumes that there will only
+be 1 (internal) panel on a system.
+
+On systems with 2 panels this may be a problem, depending on
+what interface acpi_video_get_backlight_type() selects:
+
+1. native: in this case the KMS driver is expected to know which backlight
+   device belongs to which output so everything should just work.
+2. video: this does support controlling multiple backlights, but some work
+   will need to be done to get the output <-> backlight device mapping
+
+The above assumes both panels will require the same backlight interface type.
+Things will break on systems with multiple panels where the 2 panels need
+a different type of control. E.g. one panel needs ACPI video backlight control,
+where as the other is using native backlight control. Currently in this case
+only one of the 2 required backlight devices will get registered, based on
+the acpi_video_get_backlight_type() return value.
+
+If this (theoretical) case ever shows up, then supporting this will need some
+work. A possible solution here would be to pass a device and connector-name
+to acpi_video_get_backlight_type() so that it can deal with this.
+
+Note in a way we already have a case where userspace sees 2 panels,
+in dual GPU laptop setups with a mux. On those systems we may see
+either 2 native backlight devices; or 2 native backlight devices.
+
+Userspace already has code to deal with this by detecting if the related
+panel is active (iow which way the mux between the GPU and the panels
+points) and then uses that backlight device. Userspace here very much
+assumes a single panel though. It picks only 1 of the 2 backlight devices
+and then only uses that one.
+
+Note that all userspace code (that I know off) is currently hardcoded
+to assume a single panel.
+
+Before the recent changes to not register multiple (e.g. video + native)
+/sys/class/backlight devices for a single panel (on a single GPU laptop),
+userspace would see multiple backlight devices all controlling the same
+backlight.
+
+To deal with this userspace had to always picks one preferred device under
+/sys/class/backlight and will ignore the others. So to support brightness
+control on multiple panels userspace will need to be updated too.
+
+There are plans to allow brightness control through the KMS API by adding
+a "display brightness" property to drm_connector objects for panels. This
+solves a number of issues with the /sys/class/backlight API, including not
+being able to map a sysfs backlight device to a specific connector. Any
+userspace changes to add support for brightness control on devices with
+multiple panels really should build on top of this new KMS property.
+
+Contact: Hans de Goede
+
+Level: Advanced
+
 Outside DRM
 ===========
 
-- 
2.37.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@freedesktop.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 31/31] drm/todo: Add entry about dealing with brightness control on devices with > 1 panel
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-32-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

Add an entry summarizing the discussion about dealing with brightness
control on devices with more then 1 internal panel.

The original discussion can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220517152331.16217-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
index 7634c27ac562..393d218e4a0c 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
@@ -679,6 +679,74 @@ Contact: Sam Ravnborg
 
 Level: Advanced
 
+Brightness handling on devices with multiple internal panels
+============================================================
+
+On x86/ACPI devices there can be multiple backlight firmware interfaces:
+(ACPI) video, vendor specific and others. As well as direct/native (PWM)
+register programming by the KMS driver.
+
+To deal with this backlight drivers used on x86/ACPI call
+acpi_video_get_backlight_type() which has heuristics (+quirks) to select
+which backlight interface to use; and backlight drivers which do not match
+the returned type will not register themselves, so that only one backlight
+device gets registered (in a single GPU setup, see below).
+
+At the moment this more or less assumes that there will only
+be 1 (internal) panel on a system.
+
+On systems with 2 panels this may be a problem, depending on
+what interface acpi_video_get_backlight_type() selects:
+
+1. native: in this case the KMS driver is expected to know which backlight
+   device belongs to which output so everything should just work.
+2. video: this does support controlling multiple backlights, but some work
+   will need to be done to get the output <-> backlight device mapping
+
+The above assumes both panels will require the same backlight interface type.
+Things will break on systems with multiple panels where the 2 panels need
+a different type of control. E.g. one panel needs ACPI video backlight control,
+where as the other is using native backlight control. Currently in this case
+only one of the 2 required backlight devices will get registered, based on
+the acpi_video_get_backlight_type() return value.
+
+If this (theoretical) case ever shows up, then supporting this will need some
+work. A possible solution here would be to pass a device and connector-name
+to acpi_video_get_backlight_type() so that it can deal with this.
+
+Note in a way we already have a case where userspace sees 2 panels,
+in dual GPU laptop setups with a mux. On those systems we may see
+either 2 native backlight devices; or 2 native backlight devices.
+
+Userspace already has code to deal with this by detecting if the related
+panel is active (iow which way the mux between the GPU and the panels
+points) and then uses that backlight device. Userspace here very much
+assumes a single panel though. It picks only 1 of the 2 backlight devices
+and then only uses that one.
+
+Note that all userspace code (that I know off) is currently hardcoded
+to assume a single panel.
+
+Before the recent changes to not register multiple (e.g. video + native)
+/sys/class/backlight devices for a single panel (on a single GPU laptop),
+userspace would see multiple backlight devices all controlling the same
+backlight.
+
+To deal with this userspace had to always picks one preferred device under
+/sys/class/backlight and will ignore the others. So to support brightness
+control on multiple panels userspace will need to be updated too.
+
+There are plans to allow brightness control through the KMS API by adding
+a "display brightness" property to drm_connector objects for panels. This
+solves a number of issues with the /sys/class/backlight API, including not
+being able to map a sysfs backlight device to a specific connector. Any
+userspace changes to add support for brightness control on devices with
+multiple panels really should build on top of this new KMS property.
+
+Contact: Hans de Goede
+
+Level: Advanced
+
 Outside DRM
 ===========
 
-- 
2.37.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@freedesktop.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 31/31] drm/todo: Add entry about dealing with brightness control on devices with > 1 panel
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-32-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

Add an entry summarizing the discussion about dealing with brightness
control on devices with more then 1 internal panel.

The original discussion can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220517152331.16217-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
index 7634c27ac562..393d218e4a0c 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
@@ -679,6 +679,74 @@ Contact: Sam Ravnborg
 
 Level: Advanced
 
+Brightness handling on devices with multiple internal panels
+============================================================
+
+On x86/ACPI devices there can be multiple backlight firmware interfaces:
+(ACPI) video, vendor specific and others. As well as direct/native (PWM)
+register programming by the KMS driver.
+
+To deal with this backlight drivers used on x86/ACPI call
+acpi_video_get_backlight_type() which has heuristics (+quirks) to select
+which backlight interface to use; and backlight drivers which do not match
+the returned type will not register themselves, so that only one backlight
+device gets registered (in a single GPU setup, see below).
+
+At the moment this more or less assumes that there will only
+be 1 (internal) panel on a system.
+
+On systems with 2 panels this may be a problem, depending on
+what interface acpi_video_get_backlight_type() selects:
+
+1. native: in this case the KMS driver is expected to know which backlight
+   device belongs to which output so everything should just work.
+2. video: this does support controlling multiple backlights, but some work
+   will need to be done to get the output <-> backlight device mapping
+
+The above assumes both panels will require the same backlight interface type.
+Things will break on systems with multiple panels where the 2 panels need
+a different type of control. E.g. one panel needs ACPI video backlight control,
+where as the other is using native backlight control. Currently in this case
+only one of the 2 required backlight devices will get registered, based on
+the acpi_video_get_backlight_type() return value.
+
+If this (theoretical) case ever shows up, then supporting this will need some
+work. A possible solution here would be to pass a device and connector-name
+to acpi_video_get_backlight_type() so that it can deal with this.
+
+Note in a way we already have a case where userspace sees 2 panels,
+in dual GPU laptop setups with a mux. On those systems we may see
+either 2 native backlight devices; or 2 native backlight devices.
+
+Userspace already has code to deal with this by detecting if the related
+panel is active (iow which way the mux between the GPU and the panels
+points) and then uses that backlight device. Userspace here very much
+assumes a single panel though. It picks only 1 of the 2 backlight devices
+and then only uses that one.
+
+Note that all userspace code (that I know off) is currently hardcoded
+to assume a single panel.
+
+Before the recent changes to not register multiple (e.g. video + native)
+/sys/class/backlight devices for a single panel (on a single GPU laptop),
+userspace would see multiple backlight devices all controlling the same
+backlight.
+
+To deal with this userspace had to always picks one preferred device under
+/sys/class/backlight and will ignore the others. So to support brightness
+control on multiple panels userspace will need to be updated too.
+
+There are plans to allow brightness control through the KMS API by adding
+a "display brightness" property to drm_connector objects for panels. This
+solves a number of issues with the /sys/class/backlight API, including not
+being able to map a sysfs backlight device to a specific connector. Any
+userspace changes to add support for brightness control on devices with
+multiple panels really should build on top of this new KMS property.
+
+Contact: Hans de Goede
+
+Level: Advanced
+
 Outside DRM
 ===========
 
-- 
2.37.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Pan@freedesktop.org, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 31/31] drm/todo: Add entry about dealing with brightness control on devices with > 1 panel
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:37:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825143726.269890-32-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825143726.269890-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

Add an entry summarizing the discussion about dealing with brightness
control on devices with more then 1 internal panel.

The original discussion can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220517152331.16217-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
index 7634c27ac562..393d218e4a0c 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
@@ -679,6 +679,74 @@ Contact: Sam Ravnborg
 
 Level: Advanced
 
+Brightness handling on devices with multiple internal panels
+============================================================
+
+On x86/ACPI devices there can be multiple backlight firmware interfaces:
+(ACPI) video, vendor specific and others. As well as direct/native (PWM)
+register programming by the KMS driver.
+
+To deal with this backlight drivers used on x86/ACPI call
+acpi_video_get_backlight_type() which has heuristics (+quirks) to select
+which backlight interface to use; and backlight drivers which do not match
+the returned type will not register themselves, so that only one backlight
+device gets registered (in a single GPU setup, see below).
+
+At the moment this more or less assumes that there will only
+be 1 (internal) panel on a system.
+
+On systems with 2 panels this may be a problem, depending on
+what interface acpi_video_get_backlight_type() selects:
+
+1. native: in this case the KMS driver is expected to know which backlight
+   device belongs to which output so everything should just work.
+2. video: this does support controlling multiple backlights, but some work
+   will need to be done to get the output <-> backlight device mapping
+
+The above assumes both panels will require the same backlight interface type.
+Things will break on systems with multiple panels where the 2 panels need
+a different type of control. E.g. one panel needs ACPI video backlight control,
+where as the other is using native backlight control. Currently in this case
+only one of the 2 required backlight devices will get registered, based on
+the acpi_video_get_backlight_type() return value.
+
+If this (theoretical) case ever shows up, then supporting this will need some
+work. A possible solution here would be to pass a device and connector-name
+to acpi_video_get_backlight_type() so that it can deal with this.
+
+Note in a way we already have a case where userspace sees 2 panels,
+in dual GPU laptop setups with a mux. On those systems we may see
+either 2 native backlight devices; or 2 native backlight devices.
+
+Userspace already has code to deal with this by detecting if the related
+panel is active (iow which way the mux between the GPU and the panels
+points) and then uses that backlight device. Userspace here very much
+assumes a single panel though. It picks only 1 of the 2 backlight devices
+and then only uses that one.
+
+Note that all userspace code (that I know off) is currently hardcoded
+to assume a single panel.
+
+Before the recent changes to not register multiple (e.g. video + native)
+/sys/class/backlight devices for a single panel (on a single GPU laptop),
+userspace would see multiple backlight devices all controlling the same
+backlight.
+
+To deal with this userspace had to always picks one preferred device under
+/sys/class/backlight and will ignore the others. So to support brightness
+control on multiple panels userspace will need to be updated too.
+
+There are plans to allow brightness control through the KMS API by adding
+a "display brightness" property to drm_connector objects for panels. This
+solves a number of issues with the /sys/class/backlight API, including not
+being able to map a sysfs backlight device to a specific connector. Any
+userspace changes to add support for brightness control on devices with
+multiple panels really should build on top of this new KMS property.
+
+Contact: Hans de Goede
+
+Level: Advanced
+
 Outside DRM
 ===========
 
-- 
2.37.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 300+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-25 14:36 [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 00/31] drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 01/31] ACPI: video: Add acpi_video_backlight_use_native() helper Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 02/31] drm/i915: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-09-25 23:39   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-09-25 23:39     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-09-25 23:39     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-09-25 23:39     ` [Nouveau] " Dmitry Osipenko
2022-09-27 11:04     ` Hans de Goede
2022-09-27 11:04       ` Hans de Goede
2022-09-27 11:04       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-09-27 11:04       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-24 20:30       ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-24 20:30         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-24 20:30         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-24 20:30         ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-24 20:30         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 18:50         ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 18:50           ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 18:50           ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 18:50           ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 18:50           ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 19:32           ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 19:32             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 19:32             ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 19:32             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 19:32             ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:25             ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:25               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:25               ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:25               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:25               ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:31               ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:31                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:31                 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:31                 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:31                 ` [Nouveau] " Limonciello, Mario
2022-10-25 20:32               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:32                 ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:32                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:32                 ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:32                 ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 20:40               ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:40                 ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:40                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:40                 ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 20:40                 ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:27                 ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:27                   ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:27                   ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:27                   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:27                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-25 23:40                   ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:40                     ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:40                     ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:40                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-25 23:40                     ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26  9:59                     ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-26  9:59                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-26  9:59                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-26  9:59                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-26  9:59                       ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-26 20:49                       ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26 20:49                         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26 20:49                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26 20:49                         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-26 20:49                         ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  8:51                         ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  8:51                           ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  8:51                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  8:51                           ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  8:51                           ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:11                           ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:11                             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:11                             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:11                             ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:11                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:39                             ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:39                               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:39                               ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:39                               ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:39                               ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27  9:52                               ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:52                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:52                                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:52                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27  9:52                                 ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Garrett
2022-10-27 10:37                                 ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 10:37                                   ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 10:37                                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 10:37                                   ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 10:37                                   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:09                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:09                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:09                                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:09                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:09                                     ` [Nouveau] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:17                                     ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:17                                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:17                                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:17                                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:17                                       ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-10-27 12:19                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:19                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:19                                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:19                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-27 12:19                                         ` [Nouveau] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-04 16:23                                     ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-04 16:23                                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-04 16:23                                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-11-04 16:23                                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-11-04 16:23                                       ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 03/31] drm/amdgpu: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v3) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36 ` [PATCH v5 04/31] drm/radeon: " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/31] drm/nouveau: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 06/31] ACPI: video: Drop backlight_device_get_by_type() call from acpi_video_get_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 07/31] ACPI: video: Remove acpi_video_bus from list before tearing it down Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/31] ACPI: video: Simplify acpi_video_unregister_backlight() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 09/31] ACPI: video: Make backlight class device registration a separate step (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/31] ACPI: video: Remove code to unregister acpi_video backlight when a native backlight registers Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/31] drm/i915: Call acpi_video_register_backlight() (v3) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-09-02 13:20   ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 13:20     ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 13:20     ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 13:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-09-02 13:20     ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/31] drm/nouveau: Register ACPI video backlight when nv_backlight registration fails (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/31] drm/amdgpu: Register ACPI video backlight when skipping amdgpu backlight registration Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 14/31] drm/radeon: Register ACPI video backlight when skipping radeon " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 15/31] platform/x86: nvidia-wmi-ec-backlight: Move fw interface definitions to a header (v2) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 22:11   ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:11     ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:11     ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:11     ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 16/31] ACPI: video: Refactor acpi_video_get_backlight_type() a bit Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 17/31] ACPI: video: Add Nvidia WMI EC brightness control detection (v3) Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 22:21   ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:21     ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:21     ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 22:21     ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 11:41     ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 11:41       ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 11:41       ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 11:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 11:41       ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-29 16:43       ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 16:43         ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 16:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 16:43         ` Daniel Dadap
2022-08-29 16:43         ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Dadap
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 18/31] ACPI: video: Add Apple GMUX brightness control detection Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 19/31] platform/x86: nvidia-wmi-ec-backlight: Use acpi_video_get_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 20/31] platform/x86: apple-gmux: Stop calling acpi/video.h functions Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 21/31] platform/x86: toshiba_acpi: Stop using acpi_video_set_dmi_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 22/31] platform/x86: acer-wmi: Move backlight DMI quirks to acpi/video_detect.c Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 23/31] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Drop DMI chassis-type check from backlight handling Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 24/31] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Move acpi_backlight=vendor quirks to ACPI video_detect.c Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 25/31] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Move acpi_backlight=native " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 26/31] platform/x86: samsung-laptop: Move acpi_backlight=[vendor|native] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 27/31] ACPI: video: Remove acpi_video_set_dmi_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 28/31] ACPI: video: Drop "Samsung X360" acpi_backlight=native quirk Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 29/31] ACPI: video: Drop NL5x?U, PF4NU1F and PF5?U?? acpi_backlight=native quirks Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 30/31] ACPI: video: Fix indentation of video_detect_dmi_table[] entries Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [PATCH v5 31/31] drm/todo: Add entry about dealing with brightness control on devices with > 1 panel Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 14:37   ` [Nouveau] " Hans de Goede
2022-08-25 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display Patchwork
2022-08-25 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-08-25 16:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-08-29 22:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-09-27 17:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display (rev2) Patchwork
2022-10-25 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display (rev3) Patchwork
2022-10-26  0:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display (rev4) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220825143726.269890-32-hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=Pan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ddadap@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=markgross@kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.