All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shaoqin.huang@intel.com
To: rppt@kernel.org
Cc: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>,
	Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>,
	Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_reserve() 129th region
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:49:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220830014925.162718-3-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220830014925.162718-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com>

From: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>

Reserve 129th region in the memblock, and this will trigger the
memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So
using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate a valid memory region.
At the same time, reserve 128 faked memory region, and make sure these
reserved region not intersect with the valid memory region. So
memblock_double_array() will choose the valid memory region, and it will
success.

Also need to restore the reserved.regions after memblock_double_array(),
to make sure the subsequent tests can run as normal.

Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
index c8e201156cdc..d8defc9866cb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
@@ -686,6 +686,92 @@ static int memblock_reserve_twice_check(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * A test that tries to reserve the 129th memory block.
+ * Expect to trigger memblock_double_array() to double the
+ * memblock.memory.max, find a new valid memory as
+ * reserved.regions.
+ */
+static int memblock_reserve_many_check(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	void *orig_region;
+	struct region r = {
+		.base = SZ_16K,
+		.size = MEM_SIZE,
+	};
+	phys_addr_t memory_base = SZ_128K;
+	phys_addr_t new_reserved_regions_size;
+
+	PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+	reset_memblock_regions();
+	memblock_allow_resize();
+
+	/* Add a valid memory region used by double_array(). */
+	dummy_physical_memory_init();
+	memblock_add((phys_addr_t)get_memory_block_base(), MEM_SIZE);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; i++) {
+		/* Reserve some fakes memory region to fulfill the memblock. */
+		memblock_reserve(memory_base, MEM_SIZE);
+
+		ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, i + 1);
+		ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, (i + 1) * MEM_SIZE);
+
+		/* Keep the gap so these memory region will not be merged. */
+		memory_base += MEM_SIZE * 2;
+	}
+
+	orig_region = memblock.reserved.regions;
+
+	/* This reserve the 129 memory_region, and makes it double array. */
+	memblock_reserve(memory_base, MEM_SIZE);
+
+	/*
+	 * This is the memory region size used by the doubled reserved.regions,
+	 * and it has been reserved due to it has been used. The size is used to
+	 * calculate the total_size that the memblock.reserved have now.
+	 */
+	new_reserved_regions_size = PAGE_ALIGN((INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2) *
+					sizeof(struct memblock_region));
+	/*
+	 * The double_array() will find a free memory region as the new
+	 * reserved.regions, and the used memory region will be reserved, so
+	 * there will be one more region exist in the reserved memblock. And the
+	 * one more reserved region's size is new_reserved_regions_size.
+	 */
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1 + 1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1) * MEM_SIZE +
+						new_reserved_regions_size);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2);
+
+	/* The base is very small, so it should be insert to the first region. */
+	memblock_reserve(r.base, r.size);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.regions[0].base, r.base);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.regions[0].size, r.size);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2 + 1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2) * MEM_SIZE +
+						new_reserved_regions_size);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2);
+
+	dummy_physical_memory_cleanup();
+
+	/*
+	 * The current reserved.regions is occupying a range of memory that
+	 * allocated from dummy_physical_memory_init(). After free the memory,
+	 * we must not use it. So restore the origin memory region to make sure
+	 * the tests can run as normal and not affected by the double array.
+	 */
+	memblock.reserved.regions = orig_region;
+	memblock.reserved.cnt = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS;
+
+	test_pass_pop();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int memblock_reserve_checks(void)
 {
 	prefix_reset();
@@ -698,6 +784,7 @@ static int memblock_reserve_checks(void)
 	memblock_reserve_overlap_bottom_check();
 	memblock_reserve_within_check();
 	memblock_reserve_twice_check();
+	memblock_reserve_many_check();
 
 	prefix_pop();
 
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-30  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-30  1:49 [PATCH 0/3] Add tests trying to memblock_add() or memblock_reserve() 129th region shaoqin.huang
2022-08-30  1:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_add() " shaoqin.huang
2022-09-01  8:02   ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-01  8:35     ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-30  1:49 ` shaoqin.huang [this message]
2022-09-01  8:08   ` [PATCH 2/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_reserve() " Mike Rapoport
2022-09-01  8:43     ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-30  1:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] memblock test: Update TODO list shaoqin.huang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-22  2:33 [PATCH 0/3] Add tests trying to memblock_add() or memblock_reserve() 129th region shaoqin.huang
2022-08-22  2:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] memblock test: Add test to " shaoqin.huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220830014925.162718-3-shaoqin.huang@intel.com \
    --to=shaoqin.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=karolinadrobnik@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=remckee0@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.