On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 07:11:54 +0000 "Sa, Nuno" wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > From: Dan Carpenter > > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 8:56 AM > > To: kbuild@lists.01.org; Hennerich, Michael > > > > Cc: lkp@intel.com; kbuild-all@lists.01.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > Jonathan Cameron ; Sa, Nuno > > > > Subject: [jic23-iio:testing 149/150] drivers/iio/dac/ad5593r.c:87 > > ad5593r_gpio_read() error: uninitialized symbol 'val'. > > > > [External] > > > > tree: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/g > > it/jic23/iio.git__;!!A3Ni8CS0y2Y!94Jf_eIoy5zwbmsSRdWgugxbqkbgHFd0A88T > > z4SKRufGLX24YYSEzKlB13AXeYzsBWzd5HW-SqPpIzc8hvh-6w$ testing > > head: 62a6e699f4669b2c51f408273756f93b21c9f1a1 > > commit: 53b6e3b2164c5807669fbf6b3df0e1494b4d03b8 [149/150] iio: dac: > > ad5593r: Fix i2c read protocol requirements > > config: x86_64-randconfig-m001 > > compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-5) 11.3.0 > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter > > > > smatch warnings: > > drivers/iio/dac/ad5593r.c:87 ad5593r_gpio_read() error: uninitialized symbol > > 'val'. > > > > vim +/val +87 drivers/iio/dac/ad5593r.c > > > > 56ca9db862bf3d7 Paul Cercueil 2016-04-05 79 static int > > ad5593r_gpio_read(struct ad5592r_state *st, u8 *value) > > 56ca9db862bf3d7 Paul Cercueil 2016-04-05 80 { > > 56ca9db862bf3d7 Paul Cercueil 2016-04-05 81 struct i2c_client *i2c = > > to_i2c_client(st->dev); > > 53b6e3b2164c580 Michael Hennerich 2022-09-13 82 u16 val; > > 53b6e3b2164c580 Michael Hennerich 2022-09-13 83 int ret; > > 56ca9db862bf3d7 Paul Cercueil 2016-04-05 84 > > 53b6e3b2164c580 Michael Hennerich 2022-09-13 85 ret = > > ad5593r_read_word(i2c, AD5593R_MODE_GPIO_READBACK, &val); > > 56ca9db862bf3d7 Paul Cercueil 2016-04-05 86 > > 56ca9db862bf3d7 Paul Cercueil 2016-04-05 @87 *value = (u8) val; > > > > > > In the original code the error checking prevented reading uninitialized > > variables. It's not really a problem, because ad5593r_read_word() can't > > actually fail but, you know? Technically the checker is correct. > > Hmm, in theory, it can if one of the i2c functions (for some reason) return error. > Not sure how to handle this... Given this is still in the testing branch should I > just re-spin another version of the series? Jonathan? Either a fix patch or a respin is fine as long as I haven't pushed it out as togreg (once that happens I would almost always want a fix on top). Separate fix is slightly easier for me. Jonathan > > - Nuno Sá