From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] ARM: remove lazy evaluation in Makefile
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:13:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221014201354.3190007-2-ndesaulniers@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014201354.3190007-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
arch-y and tune-y used lazy evaluation since they used to contain
cc-option checks. They don't any longer, so just eagerly evaluate these
command line flags.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
---
No change from v3.
arch/arm/Makefile | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile
index c846119c448f..8dd943b50b7d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/Makefile
@@ -63,44 +63,38 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-ipa-sra)
# Note that GCC does not numerically define an architecture version
# macro, but instead defines a whole series of macros which makes
# testing for a specific architecture or later rather impossible.
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7M) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -march=armv7-m
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -march=armv7-a
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v6) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=6 -march=armv6
-# Only override the compiler option if ARMv6. The ARMv6K extensions are
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7M) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -march=armv7-m
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -march=armv7-a
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v6) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=6 -march=armv6
+# Only override the compiler opt:ion if ARMv6. The ARMv6K extensions are
# always available in ARMv7
ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_32v6),y)
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=6 -march=armv6k
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=6 -march=armv6k
endif
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v5) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=5 -march=armv5te
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v4T) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=4 -march=armv4t
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v4) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=4 -march=armv4
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v3) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=3 -march=armv3m
-
-# Evaluate arch cc-option calls now
-arch-y := $(arch-y)
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v5) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=5 -march=armv5te
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v4T) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=4 -march=armv4t
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v4) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=4 -march=armv4
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v3) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=3 -march=armv3m
# This selects how we optimise for the processor.
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM7TDMI) =-mtune=arm7tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM720T) =-mtune=arm7tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM740T) =-mtune=arm7tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM9TDMI) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM940T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM946E) =-mtune=arm9e
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM920T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM922T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM925T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM926T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_FA526) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_SA110) =-mtune=strongarm110
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_SA1100) =-mtune=strongarm1100
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSCALE) =-mtune=xscale
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSC3) =-mtune=xscale
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_FEROCEON) =-mtune=xscale
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_V6) =-mtune=arm1136j-s
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_V6K) =-mtune=arm1136j-s
-
-# Evaluate tune cc-option calls now
-tune-y := $(tune-y)
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM7TDMI) :=-mtune=arm7tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM720T) :=-mtune=arm7tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM740T) :=-mtune=arm7tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM9TDMI) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM940T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM946E) :=-mtune=arm9e
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM920T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM922T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM925T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM926T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_FA526) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_SA110) :=-mtune=strongarm110
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_SA1100) :=-mtune=strongarm1100
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSCALE) :=-mtune=xscale
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSC3) :=-mtune=xscale
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_FEROCEON) :=-mtune=xscale
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_V6) :=-mtune=arm1136j-s
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_V6K) :=-mtune=arm1136j-s
ifeq ($(CONFIG_AEABI),y)
CFLAGS_ABI :=-mabi=aapcs-linux -mfpu=vfp
--
2.38.0.413.g74048e4d9e-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] ARM: remove lazy evaluation in Makefile
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:13:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221014201354.3190007-2-ndesaulniers@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014201354.3190007-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
arch-y and tune-y used lazy evaluation since they used to contain
cc-option checks. They don't any longer, so just eagerly evaluate these
command line flags.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
---
No change from v3.
arch/arm/Makefile | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile
index c846119c448f..8dd943b50b7d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/Makefile
@@ -63,44 +63,38 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-ipa-sra)
# Note that GCC does not numerically define an architecture version
# macro, but instead defines a whole series of macros which makes
# testing for a specific architecture or later rather impossible.
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7M) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -march=armv7-m
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -march=armv7-a
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v6) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=6 -march=armv6
-# Only override the compiler option if ARMv6. The ARMv6K extensions are
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7M) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -march=armv7-m
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -march=armv7-a
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v6) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=6 -march=armv6
+# Only override the compiler opt:ion if ARMv6. The ARMv6K extensions are
# always available in ARMv7
ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_32v6),y)
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=6 -march=armv6k
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=6 -march=armv6k
endif
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v5) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=5 -march=armv5te
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v4T) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=4 -march=armv4t
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v4) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=4 -march=armv4
-arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v3) =-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=3 -march=armv3m
-
-# Evaluate arch cc-option calls now
-arch-y := $(arch-y)
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v5) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=5 -march=armv5te
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v4T) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=4 -march=armv4t
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v4) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=4 -march=armv4
+arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v3) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=3 -march=armv3m
# This selects how we optimise for the processor.
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM7TDMI) =-mtune=arm7tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM720T) =-mtune=arm7tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM740T) =-mtune=arm7tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM9TDMI) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM940T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM946E) =-mtune=arm9e
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM920T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM922T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM925T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM926T) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_FA526) =-mtune=arm9tdmi
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_SA110) =-mtune=strongarm110
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_SA1100) =-mtune=strongarm1100
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSCALE) =-mtune=xscale
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSC3) =-mtune=xscale
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_FEROCEON) =-mtune=xscale
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_V6) =-mtune=arm1136j-s
-tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_V6K) =-mtune=arm1136j-s
-
-# Evaluate tune cc-option calls now
-tune-y := $(tune-y)
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM7TDMI) :=-mtune=arm7tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM720T) :=-mtune=arm7tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM740T) :=-mtune=arm7tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM9TDMI) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM940T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM946E) :=-mtune=arm9e
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM920T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM922T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM925T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_ARM926T) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_FA526) :=-mtune=arm9tdmi
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_SA110) :=-mtune=strongarm110
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_SA1100) :=-mtune=strongarm1100
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSCALE) :=-mtune=xscale
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSC3) :=-mtune=xscale
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_FEROCEON) :=-mtune=xscale
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_V6) :=-mtune=arm1136j-s
+tune-$(CONFIG_CPU_V6K) :=-mtune=arm1136j-s
ifeq ($(CONFIG_AEABI),y)
CFLAGS_ABI :=-mabi=aapcs-linux -mfpu=vfp
--
2.38.0.413.g74048e4d9e-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-14 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-14 20:13 [PATCH v4 0/4] pass -march= only to compiler Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13 ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ARM: remove lazy evaluation in Makefile Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:18 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 21:18 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: use .arch directives instead of assembler command line flags Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:19 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 21:19 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-08 18:30 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-08 18:30 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-08 18:37 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-08 18:37 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-08 18:40 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-08 18:40 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: only use -mtp=cp15 for the compiler Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:20 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 21:20 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: pass -march= only to compiler Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:21 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 21:21 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:16 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221014201354.3190007-2-ndesaulniers@google.com \
--to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.