From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
<libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search caused by wrong boot loader inode
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 12:07:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221021040731.4180649-3-libaokun1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021040731.4180649-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
We got a issue as fllows:
==================================================================
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:203!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 1 PID: 945 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.0.0-next-20221007-dirty #349
RIP: 0010:ext4_es_end.isra.0+0x34/0x42
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000143b768 EFLAGS: 00010203
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881769cd0b8 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8fc27cf7 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
RBP: ffff8881769cd0bc R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffc9000143b5f8
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8881769cd0a0
R13: ffff8881768e5668 R14: 00000000768e52f0 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007f359f7f05c0(0000)GS:ffff88842fd00000(0000)knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f359f5a2000 CR3: 000000017130c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__es_tree_search.isra.0+0x6d/0xf5
ext4_es_cache_extent+0xfa/0x230
ext4_cache_extents+0xd2/0x110
ext4_find_extent+0x5d5/0x8c0
ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x9c/0x1d30
ext4_map_blocks+0x431/0xa50
ext4_mpage_readpages+0x48e/0xe40
ext4_readahead+0x47/0x50
read_pages+0x82/0x530
page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x199/0x2a0
do_page_cache_ra+0x47/0x70
page_cache_ra_order+0x242/0x400
ondemand_readahead+0x1e8/0x4b0
page_cache_sync_ra+0xf4/0x110
filemap_get_pages+0x131/0xb20
filemap_read+0xda/0x4b0
generic_file_read_iter+0x13a/0x250
ext4_file_read_iter+0x59/0x1d0
vfs_read+0x28f/0x460
ksys_read+0x73/0x160
__x64_sys_read+0x1e/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
</TASK>
==================================================================
In the above issue, ioctl invokes the swap_inode_boot_loader function to
swap inode<5> and inode<12>. However, inode<5> contain incorrect imode and
disordered extents, and i_nlink is set to 1. The extents check for inode in
the ext4_iget function can be bypassed bacause 5 is EXT4_BOOT_LOADER_INO.
While links_count is set to 1, the extents are not initialized in
swap_inode_boot_loader. After the ioctl command is executed successfully,
the extents are swapped to inode<12>, in this case, run the `cat` command
to view inode<12>. And Bug_ON is triggered due to the incorrect extents.
When the boot loader inode is not initialized, its imode can be one of the
following:
1) the imode is a bad type, which is marked as bad_inode in ext4_iget and
set to S_IFREG.
2) the imode is good type but not S_IFREG.
3) the imode is S_IFREG.
The BUG_ON may be triggered by bypassing the check in cases 1 and 2.
Therefore, when the boot loader inode is bad_inode or its imode is not
S_IFREG, initialize the inode to avoid triggering the BUG.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
index ded535535b27..c41210706ea7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static long swap_inode_boot_loader(struct super_block *sb,
/* Protect extent tree against block allocations via delalloc */
ext4_double_down_write_data_sem(inode, inode_bl);
- if (inode_bl->i_nlink == 0) {
+ if (is_bad_inode(inode_bl) || !S_ISREG(inode_bl->i_mode)) {
/* this inode has never been used as a BOOT_LOADER */
set_nlink(inode_bl, 1);
i_uid_write(inode_bl, 0);
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 4:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] ext4: fix two bug_on in __es_tree_search Baokun Li
2022-10-21 4:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search caused by wrong s_usr_quota_inum Baokun Li
2022-10-24 14:10 ` Jan Kara
2022-10-24 14:16 ` Jan Kara
2022-10-25 2:48 ` Baokun Li
2022-10-21 4:07 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2022-10-24 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search caused by wrong boot loader inode Jan Kara
2022-10-25 2:26 ` Baokun Li
2022-10-25 9:18 ` Jan Kara
2022-10-25 11:25 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221021040731.4180649-3-libaokun1@huawei.com \
--to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.