All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer
@ 2022-10-18 17:34 Ahmad Khalifa
  2022-10-19 17:06 ` Guenter Roeck
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Khalifa @ 2022-10-18 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guenter Roeck, Jean Delvare, linux-hwmon; +Cc: Ahmad Khalifa

New Asus X670 board firmware doesn't expose the WMI GUID used for the
SIO/HWM methods. The driver's GUID isn't in the ACPI tables and the
GUIDs that do exist do not expose the RSIO/WSIO and RHWM/WHWM methods
(which do exist with same IDs).


1. There are quite a few drivers out there matching on Asus boards/guids
   for various purposes, even inside hwmon/, but the NCT6775 seems to be
   the best one for that.
2. The WMI device GUIDs do not reference the right method to call the
   SIO/HWM methods, but the control method WMBD is there in the
   WMI device. It looks like WMI, but doesn't walk like WMI.
3. Access through IO will require an option to ignore ACPI conflicts as
   with other drivers since the resources are named in the ACPI tables.

The options seem to be:
A. Ignore the firmware, but add ignore_resource_conflicts
B. Proxy the calls through the ACPI method directly
C. Find a way to insert a fake WMI device. In other words, add a WMI
   driver that exposes the NCT's known GUID instead. This would still
   need 6799 support added in.

Below is a patch to demonstrate option B to add a layer to the ACPI method.
(It's not in great shape, would need more work and to be split into 2,
but for now just about showing the approach and driver's ability to
read the NCT6799)

* Replicates the *asuswmi* methods into *asusacpi* and redirects them to ACPI
* Determines WMI vs. ACPI access by matching against known board and
  loops to find the ACPI device
* Sets the access/callbacks to asusacpi
* Finally, adds the NCT6779 device support as a replica of NCT6778

Reading the device sensors is quite accurate for the first 2-3 sensors,
but further up the index, it needs more work as it's not the same map
as the 6778.


What would be the best approach to enable support for those boards?



Regards,
Ahmad

   

---
 drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c     |   8 +
 drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h          |   2 +-
 3 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c
index da9ec6983e13..709a43b7c93a 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
  *                                           (0xd451)
  * nct6798d    14      7       7       2+6    0xd428 0xc1    0x5ca3
  *                                           (0xd429)
+ * nct6799d    14      7       7       2+6    0xd802 0xc1    0x5ca3
  *
  * #temp lists the number of monitored temperature sources (first value) plus
  * the number of directly connectable temperature sensors (second value).
@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static const char * const nct6775_device_names[] = {
 	"nct6796",
 	"nct6797",
 	"nct6798",
+	"nct6799",
 };
 
 /* Common and NCT6775 specific data */
@@ -1109,6 +1111,7 @@ bool nct6775_reg_is_word_sized(struct nct6775_data *data, u16 reg)
 	case nct6796:
 	case nct6797:
 	case nct6798:
+	case nct6799:
 		return reg == 0x150 || reg == 0x153 || reg == 0x155 ||
 		  (reg & 0xfff0) == 0x4c0 ||
 		  reg == 0x402 ||
@@ -1462,6 +1465,7 @@ static int nct6775_update_pwm_limits(struct device *dev)
 		case nct6796:
 		case nct6797:
 		case nct6798:
+		case nct6799:
 			err = nct6775_read_value(data, data->REG_CRITICAL_PWM_ENABLE[i], &reg);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
@@ -3109,6 +3113,7 @@ store_auto_pwm(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 		case nct6796:
 		case nct6797:
 		case nct6798:
+		case nct6799:
 			err = nct6775_write_value(data, data->REG_CRITICAL_PWM[nr], val);
 			if (err)
 				break;
@@ -3807,6 +3812,7 @@ int nct6775_probe(struct device *dev, struct nct6775_data *data,
 	case nct6796:
 	case nct6797:
 	case nct6798:
+	case nct6799:
 		data->in_num = 15;
 		data->pwm_num = (data->kind == nct6796 ||
 				 data->kind == nct6797 ||
@@ -3855,6 +3861,7 @@ int nct6775_probe(struct device *dev, struct nct6775_data *data,
 			data->virt_temp_mask = NCT6796_VIRT_TEMP_MASK;
 			break;
 		case nct6798:
+		case nct6799:
 			data->temp_label = nct6798_temp_label;
 			data->temp_mask = NCT6798_TEMP_MASK;
 			data->virt_temp_mask = NCT6798_VIRT_TEMP_MASK;
@@ -3918,6 +3925,7 @@ int nct6775_probe(struct device *dev, struct nct6775_data *data,
 		case nct6796:
 		case nct6797:
 		case nct6798:
+		case nct6799:
 			data->REG_TSI_TEMP = NCT6796_REG_TSI_TEMP;
 			num_reg_tsi_temp = ARRAY_SIZE(NCT6796_REG_TSI_TEMP);
 			break;
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c
index b34783784213..6e44ed5eb13e 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 
 #include "nct6775.h"
 
-enum sensor_access { access_direct, access_asuswmi };
+enum sensor_access { access_direct, access_asuswmi, access_asusacpi };
 
 static const char * const nct6775_sio_names[] __initconst = {
 	"NCT6106D",
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static const char * const nct6775_sio_names[] __initconst = {
 	"NCT6796D",
 	"NCT6797D",
 	"NCT6798D",
+	"NCT6799D",
 };
 
 static unsigned short force_id;
@@ -86,6 +87,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(fan_debounce, "Enable debouncing for fan RPM signal");
 #define SIO_NCT6796_ID		0xd420
 #define SIO_NCT6797_ID		0xd450
 #define SIO_NCT6798_ID		0xd428
+#define SIO_NCT6799_ID		0xd800  /* 0xd802 with revision */
 #define SIO_ID_MASK		0xFFF8
 
 /*
@@ -113,6 +115,16 @@ struct nct6775_sio_data {
 #define ASUSWMI_METHODID_RHWM		0x5248574D
 #define ASUSWMI_METHODID_WHWM		0x5748574D
 #define ASUSWMI_UNSUPPORTED_METHOD	0xFFFFFFFE
+/*
+ * Newer boards have an ACPI method not exposed through any WMI GUID
+ * so we call it directly through acpi.
+ * Same METHODID values can be used as with WMI
+ */
+#define ASUSACPI_DEVICE_UID		"AsusMbSwInterface"
+#define ASUSACPI_DEVICE_HID		"PNP0C14"
+#define ASUSACPI_METHOD			"WMBD"
+
+struct acpi_device *asus_acpi_dev;
 
 static int nct6775_asuswmi_evaluate_method(u32 method_id, u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 val, u32 *retval)
 {
@@ -192,6 +204,85 @@ static void superio_wmi_exit(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
 {
 }
 
+
+static int nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(u32 method_id, u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 val, u32 *retval)
+{
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
+	u32 args = bank | (reg << 8) | (val << 16);
+	acpi_status status;
+	unsigned long long result;
+	union acpi_object params[3];
+	struct acpi_object_list input;
+	acpi_handle handle = acpi_device_handle(asus_acpi_dev);
+
+	params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+	params[0].integer.value = 0;
+	params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+	params[1].integer.value = method_id;
+	params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
+	params[2].buffer.length = sizeof(args);
+	params[2].buffer.pointer = (void*)&args;
+	input.count = 3;
+	input.pointer = params;
+
+	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, ASUSACPI_METHOD, &input, &result);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		return -EIO;
+
+	if (retval)
+		*retval = (u32)result & 0xFFFFFFFF;
+
+	return 0;
+#else
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+#endif
+}
+
+static inline int nct6775_asusacpi_write(u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 val)
+{
+	return nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_WHWM, bank,
+					      reg, val, NULL);
+}
+
+static inline int nct6775_asusacpi_read(u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 *val)
+{
+	u32 ret, tmp = 0;
+
+	ret = nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_RHWM, bank,
+					      reg, 0, &tmp);
+	*val = tmp;
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int superio_acpi_inb(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int reg)
+{
+	int tmp = 0;
+
+	nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_RSIO, sio_data->ld,
+					reg, 0, &tmp);
+	return tmp;
+}
+
+static void superio_acpi_outb(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int reg, int val)
+{
+	nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_WSIO, sio_data->ld,
+					reg, val, NULL);
+}
+
+static void superio_acpi_select(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int ld)
+{
+	sio_data->ld = ld;
+}
+
+static int superio_acpi_enter(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void superio_acpi_exit(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
+{
+}
+
 static void superio_outb(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int reg, int val)
 {
 	int ioreg = sio_data->sioreg;
@@ -294,6 +385,58 @@ static int nct6775_wmi_reg_write(void *ctx, unsigned int reg, unsigned int value
 	return res;
 }
 
+static inline void nct6775_acpi_set_bank(struct nct6775_data *data, u16 reg)
+{
+	u8 bank = reg >> 8;
+
+	data->bank = bank;
+}
+
+static int nct6775_acpi_reg_read(void *ctx, unsigned int reg, unsigned int *val)
+{
+	struct nct6775_data *data = ctx;
+	int err, word_sized = nct6775_reg_is_word_sized(data, reg);
+	u8 tmp = 0;
+	u16 res;
+
+	nct6775_acpi_set_bank(data, reg);
+
+	err = nct6775_asusacpi_read(data->bank, reg & 0xff, &tmp);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	res = tmp;
+	if (word_sized) {
+		err = nct6775_asusacpi_read(data->bank, (reg & 0xff) + 1, &tmp);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
+		res = (res << 8) + tmp;
+	}
+	*val = res;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int nct6775_acpi_reg_write(void *ctx, unsigned int reg, unsigned int value)
+{
+	struct nct6775_data *data = ctx;
+	int res, word_sized = nct6775_reg_is_word_sized(data, reg);
+
+	nct6775_acpi_set_bank(data, reg);
+
+	if (word_sized) {
+		res = nct6775_asusacpi_write(data->bank, reg & 0xff, value >> 8);
+		if (res)
+			return res;
+
+		res = nct6775_asusacpi_write(data->bank, (reg & 0xff) + 1, value);
+	} else {
+		res = nct6775_asusacpi_write(data->bank, reg & 0xff, value);
+	}
+
+	return res;
+}
+
 /*
  * On older chips, only registers 0x50-0x5f are banked.
  * On more recent chips, all registers are banked.
@@ -408,7 +551,7 @@ static int nct6775_resume(struct device *dev)
 	if (data->kind == nct6791 || data->kind == nct6792 ||
 	    data->kind == nct6793 || data->kind == nct6795 ||
 	    data->kind == nct6796 || data->kind == nct6797 ||
-	    data->kind == nct6798)
+	    data->kind == nct6798 || data->kind == nct6799)
 		nct6791_enable_io_mapping(sio_data);
 
 	sio_data->sio_exit(sio_data);
@@ -555,7 +698,7 @@ nct6775_check_fan_inputs(struct nct6775_data *data, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * NCT6779D, NCT6791D, NCT6792D, NCT6793D, NCT6795D, NCT6796D,
-		 * NCT6797D, NCT6798D
+		 * NCT6797D, NCT6798D, NCT6799D
 		 */
 		int cr1a = sio_data->sio_inb(sio_data, 0x1a);
 		int cr1b = sio_data->sio_inb(sio_data, 0x1b);
@@ -670,6 +813,23 @@ nct6775_check_fan_inputs(struct nct6775_data *data, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio
 			pwm6pin |= !(cred & BIT(2)) && (cr2a & BIT(3));
 			pwm6pin |= (creb & BIT(4)) && !(cr2a & BIT(0));
 
+			pwm7pin = !(cr1d & (BIT(2) | BIT(3)));
+			pwm7pin |= cr2d & BIT(7);
+			pwm7pin |= creb & BIT(2);
+			break;
+		case nct6799:
+			fan6pin = !(cr1b & BIT(0)) && (cre0 & BIT(3));
+			fan6pin |= cr2a & BIT(4);
+			fan6pin |= creb & BIT(5);
+
+			fan7pin = cr1b & BIT(5);
+			fan7pin |= !(cr2b & BIT(2));
+			fan7pin |= creb & BIT(3);
+
+			pwm6pin = !(cr1b & BIT(0)) && (cre0 & BIT(4));
+			pwm6pin |= !(cred & BIT(2)) && (cr2a & BIT(3));
+			pwm6pin |= (creb & BIT(4)) && !(cr2a & BIT(0));
+
 			pwm7pin = !(cr1d & (BIT(2) | BIT(3)));
 			pwm7pin |= cr2d & BIT(7);
 			pwm7pin |= creb & BIT(2);
@@ -828,6 +988,7 @@ static int nct6775_platform_probe_init(struct nct6775_data *data)
 	case nct6796:
 	case nct6797:
 	case nct6798:
+	case nct6799:
 		break;
 	}
 
@@ -866,6 +1027,7 @@ static int nct6775_platform_probe_init(struct nct6775_data *data)
 		case nct6796:
 		case nct6797:
 		case nct6798:
+		case nct6799:
 			tmp |= 0x7e;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -895,6 +1057,13 @@ static const struct regmap_config nct6775_wmi_regmap_config = {
 	.reg_write = nct6775_wmi_reg_write,
 };
 
+static const struct regmap_config nct6775_acpi_regmap_config = {
+	.reg_bits = 16,
+	.val_bits = 16,
+	.reg_read = nct6775_acpi_reg_read,
+	.reg_write = nct6775_acpi_reg_write,
+};
+
 static int nct6775_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -919,8 +1088,12 @@ static int nct6775_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (sio_data->access == access_direct) {
 		data->addr = res->start;
 		regmapcfg = &nct6775_regmap_config;
-	} else {
+	} else if (sio_data->access == access_asuswmi) {
 		regmapcfg = &nct6775_wmi_regmap_config;
+	} else if (sio_data->access == access_asusacpi) {
+		regmapcfg = &nct6775_acpi_regmap_config;
+	} else {
+		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
@@ -995,6 +1168,9 @@ static int __init nct6775_find(int sioaddr, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
 	case SIO_NCT6798_ID:
 		sio_data->kind = nct6798;
 		break;
+	case SIO_NCT6799_ID:
+		sio_data->kind = nct6799;
+		break;
 	default:
 		if (val != 0xffff)
 			pr_debug("unsupported chip ID: 0x%04x\n", val);
@@ -1023,7 +1199,7 @@ static int __init nct6775_find(int sioaddr, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
 	if (sio_data->kind == nct6791 || sio_data->kind == nct6792 ||
 	    sio_data->kind == nct6793 || sio_data->kind == nct6795 ||
 	    sio_data->kind == nct6796 || sio_data->kind == nct6797 ||
-	    sio_data->kind == nct6798)
+	    sio_data->kind == nct6798 || sio_data->kind == nct6799)
 		nct6791_enable_io_mapping(sio_data);
 
 	sio_data->sio_exit(sio_data);
@@ -1092,6 +1268,66 @@ static const char * const asus_wmi_boards[] = {
 	"TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)",
 };
 
+static const char * const asus_acpi_boards[] = {
+	"ROG STRIX X670E-I GAMING WIFI",
+};
+/*
+ * Callback for acpi_bus_for_each_dev() to find the
+ * right device by _UID and _HID and stop.
+ * return is an error to exit the loop
+ */
+static int nct6775_find_asus_acpi(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+	struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(dev);
+	const char *uid = acpi_device_uid(adev);
+	const char *hid = acpi_device_hid(adev);
+
+	if (uid && !strcmp(uid, ASUSACPI_DEVICE_UID) &&
+		hid && !strcmp(hid, ASUSACPI_DEVICE_HID)) {
+		asus_acpi_dev = adev;
+		return -EEXIST;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static enum sensor_access nct6775_determine_access(const char *board_name)
+{
+	int ret;
+	u8 tmp;
+	enum sensor_access access = access_direct;
+
+	ret = match_string(asus_wmi_boards, ARRAY_SIZE(asus_wmi_boards),
+				   board_name);
+	if (ret >= 0) {
+		/* if reading chip id via WMI succeeds, use WMI */
+		if (!nct6775_asuswmi_read(0, NCT6775_PORT_CHIPID, &tmp) && tmp) {
+			pr_info("Using Asus WMI to access %#x chip.\n", tmp);
+			return access_asuswmi;
+		} else {
+			pr_err("Can't read ChipID by Asus WMI.\n");
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* not WMI, try to find the ACPI device/method */
+	ret = match_string(asus_acpi_boards, ARRAY_SIZE(asus_acpi_boards),
+			board_name);
+	if (ret >= 0) {
+		acpi_bus_for_each_dev(nct6775_find_asus_acpi, &asus_acpi_dev);
+		if (!asus_acpi_dev)
+			return access;
+		/* if reading chip id via ACPI succeeds, use ACPI */
+		if (!nct6775_asusacpi_read(0, NCT6775_PORT_CHIPID, &tmp) && tmp) {
+			pr_info("Using Asus ACPI to access %#x chip.\n", tmp);
+			return access_asusacpi;
+		} else {
+			pr_err("Can't read ChipID by Asus ACPI.\n");
+		}
+	}
+
+	return access;
+}
+
 static int __init sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void)
 {
 	int i, err;
@@ -1102,7 +1338,6 @@ static int __init sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void)
 	int sioaddr[2] = { 0x2e, 0x4e };
 	enum sensor_access access = access_direct;
 	const char *board_vendor, *board_name;
-	u8 tmp;
 
 	err = platform_driver_register(&nct6775_driver);
 	if (err)
@@ -1111,20 +1346,10 @@ static int __init sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void)
 	board_vendor = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR);
 	board_name = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BOARD_NAME);
 
+	/* check if the board has WMI/ACPI access to the device */
 	if (board_name && board_vendor &&
-	    !strcmp(board_vendor, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.")) {
-		err = match_string(asus_wmi_boards, ARRAY_SIZE(asus_wmi_boards),
-				   board_name);
-		if (err >= 0) {
-			/* if reading chip id via WMI succeeds, use WMI */
-			if (!nct6775_asuswmi_read(0, NCT6775_PORT_CHIPID, &tmp) && tmp) {
-				pr_info("Using Asus WMI to access %#x chip.\n", tmp);
-				access = access_asuswmi;
-			} else {
-				pr_err("Can't read ChipID by Asus WMI.\n");
-			}
-		}
-	}
+	    !strcmp(board_vendor, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."))
+		access = nct6775_determine_access(board_name);
 
 	/*
 	 * initialize sio_data->kind and sio_data->sioreg.
@@ -1154,6 +1379,12 @@ static int __init sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void)
 			sio_data.sio_select = superio_wmi_select;
 			sio_data.sio_enter = superio_wmi_enter;
 			sio_data.sio_exit = superio_wmi_exit;
+		}else if (access == access_asusacpi) {
+			sio_data.sio_outb = superio_acpi_outb;
+			sio_data.sio_inb = superio_acpi_inb;
+			sio_data.sio_select = superio_acpi_select;
+			sio_data.sio_enter = superio_acpi_enter;
+			sio_data.sio_exit = superio_acpi_exit;
 		}
 
 		pdev[i] = platform_device_alloc(DRVNAME, address);
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h
index be41848c3cd2..44f79c5726a9 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
 enum kinds { nct6106, nct6116, nct6775, nct6776, nct6779, nct6791, nct6792,
-	     nct6793, nct6795, nct6796, nct6797, nct6798 };
+	     nct6793, nct6795, nct6796, nct6797, nct6798, nct6799 };
 enum pwm_enable { off, manual, thermal_cruise, speed_cruise, sf3, sf4 };
 
 #define NUM_TEMP	10	/* Max number of temp attribute sets w/ limits*/
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer
  2022-10-18 17:34 [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer Ahmad Khalifa
@ 2022-10-19 17:06 ` Guenter Roeck
  2022-10-19 21:04   ` Denis Pauk
  2022-10-20 16:54   ` Ahmad Khalifa
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-10-19 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ahmad Khalifa; +Cc: Jean Delvare, linux-hwmon, Zev Weiss, Denis Pauk

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:34:29PM +0100, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
> New Asus X670 board firmware doesn't expose the WMI GUID used for the
> SIO/HWM methods. The driver's GUID isn't in the ACPI tables and the
> GUIDs that do exist do not expose the RSIO/WSIO and RHWM/WHWM methods
> (which do exist with same IDs).
> 
> 
> 1. There are quite a few drivers out there matching on Asus boards/guids
>    for various purposes, even inside hwmon/, but the NCT6775 seems to be
>    the best one for that.
> 2. The WMI device GUIDs do not reference the right method to call the
>    SIO/HWM methods, but the control method WMBD is there in the
>    WMI device. It looks like WMI, but doesn't walk like WMI.
> 3. Access through IO will require an option to ignore ACPI conflicts as
>    with other drivers since the resources are named in the ACPI tables.
> 
> The options seem to be:
> A. Ignore the firmware, but add ignore_resource_conflicts
> B. Proxy the calls through the ACPI method directly
> C. Find a way to insert a fake WMI device. In other words, add a WMI
>    driver that exposes the NCT's known GUID instead. This would still
>    need 6799 support added in.
> 
> Below is a patch to demonstrate option B to add a layer to the ACPI method.
> (It's not in great shape, would need more work and to be split into 2,
> but for now just about showing the approach and driver's ability to
> read the NCT6799)
> 
> * Replicates the *asuswmi* methods into *asusacpi* and redirects them to ACPI
> * Determines WMI vs. ACPI access by matching against known board and
>   loops to find the ACPI device
> * Sets the access/callbacks to asusacpi
> * Finally, adds the NCT6779 device support as a replica of NCT6778

NCT6799 / NCT6798 ?

> 
> Reading the device sensors is quite accurate for the first 2-3 sensors,
> but further up the index, it needs more work as it's not the same map
> as the 6778.
> 
6798 ?

> 
> What would be the best approach to enable support for those boards?
> 
First, as I think you suggested as well, this needs to be (at least)
two patches, one to add support for the new chip using existing methods,
and another to enable accesses through ACPI.

Second, I don't have access to the chip datasheet. Historically it is
unlikely that the chip is indeed a clone/replica of NCT6798.
The comment above suggests that the chip is indeed not the same,
so this will have to be resolved before anything can be accepted.

Since the actual methods are the same, what is the benefit of keeping
wmi access methods around ?

Last but not least, please run your patches through checkpatch.
Couple of additional comments inline.

> 
> 
> Regards,
> Ahmad
> 
>    
> 
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c     |   8 +
>  drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h          |   2 +-
>  3 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c
> index da9ec6983e13..709a43b7c93a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>   *                                           (0xd451)
>   * nct6798d    14      7       7       2+6    0xd428 0xc1    0x5ca3
>   *                                           (0xd429)
> + * nct6799d    14      7       7       2+6    0xd802 0xc1    0x5ca3
>   *
>   * #temp lists the number of monitored temperature sources (first value) plus
>   * the number of directly connectable temperature sensors (second value).
> @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static const char * const nct6775_device_names[] = {
>  	"nct6796",
>  	"nct6797",
>  	"nct6798",
> +	"nct6799",
>  };
>  
>  /* Common and NCT6775 specific data */
> @@ -1109,6 +1111,7 @@ bool nct6775_reg_is_word_sized(struct nct6775_data *data, u16 reg)
>  	case nct6796:
>  	case nct6797:
>  	case nct6798:
> +	case nct6799:
>  		return reg == 0x150 || reg == 0x153 || reg == 0x155 ||
>  		  (reg & 0xfff0) == 0x4c0 ||
>  		  reg == 0x402 ||
> @@ -1462,6 +1465,7 @@ static int nct6775_update_pwm_limits(struct device *dev)
>  		case nct6796:
>  		case nct6797:
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			err = nct6775_read_value(data, data->REG_CRITICAL_PWM_ENABLE[i], &reg);
>  			if (err)
>  				return err;
> @@ -3109,6 +3113,7 @@ store_auto_pwm(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  		case nct6796:
>  		case nct6797:
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			err = nct6775_write_value(data, data->REG_CRITICAL_PWM[nr], val);
>  			if (err)
>  				break;
> @@ -3807,6 +3812,7 @@ int nct6775_probe(struct device *dev, struct nct6775_data *data,
>  	case nct6796:
>  	case nct6797:
>  	case nct6798:
> +	case nct6799:
>  		data->in_num = 15;
>  		data->pwm_num = (data->kind == nct6796 ||
>  				 data->kind == nct6797 ||
> @@ -3855,6 +3861,7 @@ int nct6775_probe(struct device *dev, struct nct6775_data *data,
>  			data->virt_temp_mask = NCT6796_VIRT_TEMP_MASK;
>  			break;
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			data->temp_label = nct6798_temp_label;
>  			data->temp_mask = NCT6798_TEMP_MASK;
>  			data->virt_temp_mask = NCT6798_VIRT_TEMP_MASK;
> @@ -3918,6 +3925,7 @@ int nct6775_probe(struct device *dev, struct nct6775_data *data,
>  		case nct6796:
>  		case nct6797:
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			data->REG_TSI_TEMP = NCT6796_REG_TSI_TEMP;
>  			num_reg_tsi_temp = ARRAY_SIZE(NCT6796_REG_TSI_TEMP);
>  			break;
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c
> index b34783784213..6e44ed5eb13e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>  
>  #include "nct6775.h"
>  
> -enum sensor_access { access_direct, access_asuswmi };
> +enum sensor_access { access_direct, access_asuswmi, access_asusacpi };
>  
>  static const char * const nct6775_sio_names[] __initconst = {
>  	"NCT6106D",
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static const char * const nct6775_sio_names[] __initconst = {
>  	"NCT6796D",
>  	"NCT6797D",
>  	"NCT6798D",
> +	"NCT6799D",
>  };
>  
>  static unsigned short force_id;
> @@ -86,6 +87,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(fan_debounce, "Enable debouncing for fan RPM signal");
>  #define SIO_NCT6796_ID		0xd420
>  #define SIO_NCT6797_ID		0xd450
>  #define SIO_NCT6798_ID		0xd428
> +#define SIO_NCT6799_ID		0xd800  /* 0xd802 with revision */
>  #define SIO_ID_MASK		0xFFF8
>  
>  /*
> @@ -113,6 +115,16 @@ struct nct6775_sio_data {
>  #define ASUSWMI_METHODID_RHWM		0x5248574D
>  #define ASUSWMI_METHODID_WHWM		0x5748574D
>  #define ASUSWMI_UNSUPPORTED_METHOD	0xFFFFFFFE
> +/*
> + * Newer boards have an ACPI method not exposed through any WMI GUID
> + * so we call it directly through acpi.
> + * Same METHODID values can be used as with WMI
> + */
> +#define ASUSACPI_DEVICE_UID		"AsusMbSwInterface"
> +#define ASUSACPI_DEVICE_HID		"PNP0C14"
> +#define ASUSACPI_METHOD			"WMBD"
> +
> +struct acpi_device *asus_acpi_dev;
>  
>  static int nct6775_asuswmi_evaluate_method(u32 method_id, u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 val, u32 *retval)
>  {
> @@ -192,6 +204,85 @@ static void superio_wmi_exit(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +
> +static int nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(u32 method_id, u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 val, u32 *retval)
> +{
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
> +	u32 args = bank | (reg << 8) | (val << 16);
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	unsigned long long result;
> +	union acpi_object params[3];
> +	struct acpi_object_list input;
> +	acpi_handle handle = acpi_device_handle(asus_acpi_dev);
> +
> +	params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> +	params[0].integer.value = 0;
> +	params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> +	params[1].integer.value = method_id;
> +	params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
> +	params[2].buffer.length = sizeof(args);
> +	params[2].buffer.pointer = (void*)&args;
> +	input.count = 3;
> +	input.pointer = params;
> +
> +	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, ASUSACPI_METHOD, &input, &result);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	if (retval)
> +		*retval = (u32)result & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +#else
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static inline int nct6775_asusacpi_write(u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 val)
> +{
> +	return nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_WHWM, bank,
> +					      reg, val, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int nct6775_asusacpi_read(u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> +{
> +	u32 ret, tmp = 0;
> +
> +	ret = nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_RHWM, bank,
> +					      reg, 0, &tmp);
> +	*val = tmp;
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int superio_acpi_inb(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int reg)
> +{
> +	int tmp = 0;
> +
> +	nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_RSIO, sio_data->ld,
> +					reg, 0, &tmp);
> +	return tmp;
> +}
> +
> +static void superio_acpi_outb(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int reg, int val)
> +{
> +	nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_WSIO, sio_data->ld,
> +					reg, val, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static void superio_acpi_select(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int ld)
> +{
> +	sio_data->ld = ld;
> +}
> +
> +static int superio_acpi_enter(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void superio_acpi_exit(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  static void superio_outb(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int reg, int val)
>  {
>  	int ioreg = sio_data->sioreg;
> @@ -294,6 +385,58 @@ static int nct6775_wmi_reg_write(void *ctx, unsigned int reg, unsigned int value
>  	return res;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void nct6775_acpi_set_bank(struct nct6775_data *data, u16 reg)
> +{
> +	u8 bank = reg >> 8;
> +
> +	data->bank = bank;
> +}
> +
> +static int nct6775_acpi_reg_read(void *ctx, unsigned int reg, unsigned int *val)
> +{
> +	struct nct6775_data *data = ctx;
> +	int err, word_sized = nct6775_reg_is_word_sized(data, reg);
> +	u8 tmp = 0;
> +	u16 res;
> +
> +	nct6775_acpi_set_bank(data, reg);
> +
> +	err = nct6775_asusacpi_read(data->bank, reg & 0xff, &tmp);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	res = tmp;
> +	if (word_sized) {
> +		err = nct6775_asusacpi_read(data->bank, (reg & 0xff) + 1, &tmp);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		res = (res << 8) + tmp;
> +	}
> +	*val = res;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int nct6775_acpi_reg_write(void *ctx, unsigned int reg, unsigned int value)
> +{
> +	struct nct6775_data *data = ctx;
> +	int res, word_sized = nct6775_reg_is_word_sized(data, reg);
> +
> +	nct6775_acpi_set_bank(data, reg);
> +
> +	if (word_sized) {
> +		res = nct6775_asusacpi_write(data->bank, reg & 0xff, value >> 8);
> +		if (res)
> +			return res;
> +
> +		res = nct6775_asusacpi_write(data->bank, (reg & 0xff) + 1, value);
> +	} else {
> +		res = nct6775_asusacpi_write(data->bank, reg & 0xff, value);
> +	}
> +
> +	return res;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * On older chips, only registers 0x50-0x5f are banked.
>   * On more recent chips, all registers are banked.
> @@ -408,7 +551,7 @@ static int nct6775_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	if (data->kind == nct6791 || data->kind == nct6792 ||
>  	    data->kind == nct6793 || data->kind == nct6795 ||
>  	    data->kind == nct6796 || data->kind == nct6797 ||
> -	    data->kind == nct6798)
> +	    data->kind == nct6798 || data->kind == nct6799)
>  		nct6791_enable_io_mapping(sio_data);
>  
>  	sio_data->sio_exit(sio_data);
> @@ -555,7 +698,7 @@ nct6775_check_fan_inputs(struct nct6775_data *data, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio
>  	} else {
>  		/*
>  		 * NCT6779D, NCT6791D, NCT6792D, NCT6793D, NCT6795D, NCT6796D,
> -		 * NCT6797D, NCT6798D
> +		 * NCT6797D, NCT6798D, NCT6799D
>  		 */
>  		int cr1a = sio_data->sio_inb(sio_data, 0x1a);
>  		int cr1b = sio_data->sio_inb(sio_data, 0x1b);
> @@ -670,6 +813,23 @@ nct6775_check_fan_inputs(struct nct6775_data *data, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio
>  			pwm6pin |= !(cred & BIT(2)) && (cr2a & BIT(3));
>  			pwm6pin |= (creb & BIT(4)) && !(cr2a & BIT(0));
>  
> +			pwm7pin = !(cr1d & (BIT(2) | BIT(3)));
> +			pwm7pin |= cr2d & BIT(7);
> +			pwm7pin |= creb & BIT(2);
> +			break;
> +		case nct6799:
> +			fan6pin = !(cr1b & BIT(0)) && (cre0 & BIT(3));
> +			fan6pin |= cr2a & BIT(4);
> +			fan6pin |= creb & BIT(5);
> +
> +			fan7pin = cr1b & BIT(5);
> +			fan7pin |= !(cr2b & BIT(2));
> +			fan7pin |= creb & BIT(3);
> +
> +			pwm6pin = !(cr1b & BIT(0)) && (cre0 & BIT(4));
> +			pwm6pin |= !(cred & BIT(2)) && (cr2a & BIT(3));
> +			pwm6pin |= (creb & BIT(4)) && !(cr2a & BIT(0));
> +
>  			pwm7pin = !(cr1d & (BIT(2) | BIT(3)));
>  			pwm7pin |= cr2d & BIT(7);
>  			pwm7pin |= creb & BIT(2);
> @@ -828,6 +988,7 @@ static int nct6775_platform_probe_init(struct nct6775_data *data)
>  	case nct6796:
>  	case nct6797:
>  	case nct6798:
> +	case nct6799:
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -866,6 +1027,7 @@ static int nct6775_platform_probe_init(struct nct6775_data *data)
>  		case nct6796:
>  		case nct6797:
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			tmp |= 0x7e;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -895,6 +1057,13 @@ static const struct regmap_config nct6775_wmi_regmap_config = {
>  	.reg_write = nct6775_wmi_reg_write,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct regmap_config nct6775_acpi_regmap_config = {
> +	.reg_bits = 16,
> +	.val_bits = 16,
> +	.reg_read = nct6775_acpi_reg_read,
> +	.reg_write = nct6775_acpi_reg_write,
> +};
> +
>  static int nct6775_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -919,8 +1088,12 @@ static int nct6775_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (sio_data->access == access_direct) {
>  		data->addr = res->start;
>  		regmapcfg = &nct6775_regmap_config;
> -	} else {
> +	} else if (sio_data->access == access_asuswmi) {
>  		regmapcfg = &nct6775_wmi_regmap_config;
> +	} else if (sio_data->access == access_asusacpi) {
> +		regmapcfg = &nct6775_acpi_regmap_config;
> +	} else {
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> @@ -995,6 +1168,9 @@ static int __init nct6775_find(int sioaddr, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
>  	case SIO_NCT6798_ID:
>  		sio_data->kind = nct6798;
>  		break;
> +	case SIO_NCT6799_ID:
> +		sio_data->kind = nct6799;
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		if (val != 0xffff)
>  			pr_debug("unsupported chip ID: 0x%04x\n", val);
> @@ -1023,7 +1199,7 @@ static int __init nct6775_find(int sioaddr, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
>  	if (sio_data->kind == nct6791 || sio_data->kind == nct6792 ||
>  	    sio_data->kind == nct6793 || sio_data->kind == nct6795 ||
>  	    sio_data->kind == nct6796 || sio_data->kind == nct6797 ||
> -	    sio_data->kind == nct6798)
> +	    sio_data->kind == nct6798 || sio_data->kind == nct6799)
>  		nct6791_enable_io_mapping(sio_data);
>  
>  	sio_data->sio_exit(sio_data);
> @@ -1092,6 +1268,66 @@ static const char * const asus_wmi_boards[] = {
>  	"TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)",
>  };
>  
> +static const char * const asus_acpi_boards[] = {
> +	"ROG STRIX X670E-I GAMING WIFI",
> +};
> +/*
> + * Callback for acpi_bus_for_each_dev() to find the
> + * right device by _UID and _HID and stop.
> + * return is an error to exit the loop
> + */
> +static int nct6775_find_asus_acpi(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(dev);
> +	const char *uid = acpi_device_uid(adev);
> +	const char *hid = acpi_device_hid(adev);
> +
> +	if (uid && !strcmp(uid, ASUSACPI_DEVICE_UID) &&
> +		hid && !strcmp(hid, ASUSACPI_DEVICE_HID)) {
> +		asus_acpi_dev = adev;
> +		return -EEXIST;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static enum sensor_access nct6775_determine_access(const char *board_name)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	u8 tmp;
> +	enum sensor_access access = access_direct;
> +
> +	ret = match_string(asus_wmi_boards, ARRAY_SIZE(asus_wmi_boards),
> +				   board_name);
> +	if (ret >= 0) {
> +		/* if reading chip id via WMI succeeds, use WMI */
> +		if (!nct6775_asuswmi_read(0, NCT6775_PORT_CHIPID, &tmp) && tmp) {
> +			pr_info("Using Asus WMI to access %#x chip.\n", tmp);
> +			return access_asuswmi;
> +		} else {
> +			pr_err("Can't read ChipID by Asus WMI.\n");

This is not an error since another access method may be found.

> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* not WMI, try to find the ACPI device/method */
> +	ret = match_string(asus_acpi_boards, ARRAY_SIZE(asus_acpi_boards),
> +			board_name);
> +	if (ret >= 0) {
> +		acpi_bus_for_each_dev(nct6775_find_asus_acpi, &asus_acpi_dev);
> +		if (!asus_acpi_dev)
> +			return access;
> +		/* if reading chip id via ACPI succeeds, use ACPI */
> +		if (!nct6775_asusacpi_read(0, NCT6775_PORT_CHIPID, &tmp) && tmp) {
> +			pr_info("Using Asus ACPI to access %#x chip.\n", tmp);
> +			return access_asusacpi;
> +		} else {
> +			pr_err("Can't read ChipID by Asus ACPI.\n");
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return access;
> +}
> +
>  static int __init sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i, err;
> @@ -1102,7 +1338,6 @@ static int __init sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void)
>  	int sioaddr[2] = { 0x2e, 0x4e };
>  	enum sensor_access access = access_direct;
>  	const char *board_vendor, *board_name;
> -	u8 tmp;
>  
>  	err = platform_driver_register(&nct6775_driver);
>  	if (err)
> @@ -1111,20 +1346,10 @@ static int __init sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void)
>  	board_vendor = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR);
>  	board_name = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BOARD_NAME);
>  
> +	/* check if the board has WMI/ACPI access to the device */
>  	if (board_name && board_vendor &&
> -	    !strcmp(board_vendor, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.")) {
> -		err = match_string(asus_wmi_boards, ARRAY_SIZE(asus_wmi_boards),
> -				   board_name);
> -		if (err >= 0) {
> -			/* if reading chip id via WMI succeeds, use WMI */
> -			if (!nct6775_asuswmi_read(0, NCT6775_PORT_CHIPID, &tmp) && tmp) {
> -				pr_info("Using Asus WMI to access %#x chip.\n", tmp);
> -				access = access_asuswmi;
> -			} else {
> -				pr_err("Can't read ChipID by Asus WMI.\n");
> -			}
> -		}
> -	}
> +	    !strcmp(board_vendor, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."))
> +		access = nct6775_determine_access(board_name);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * initialize sio_data->kind and sio_data->sioreg.
> @@ -1154,6 +1379,12 @@ static int __init sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void)
>  			sio_data.sio_select = superio_wmi_select;
>  			sio_data.sio_enter = superio_wmi_enter;
>  			sio_data.sio_exit = superio_wmi_exit;
> +		}else if (access == access_asusacpi) {

Space after }. checkpatch should alert about that.

> +			sio_data.sio_outb = superio_acpi_outb;
> +			sio_data.sio_inb = superio_acpi_inb;
> +			sio_data.sio_select = superio_acpi_select;
> +			sio_data.sio_enter = superio_acpi_enter;
> +			sio_data.sio_exit = superio_acpi_exit;
>  		}
>  
>  		pdev[i] = platform_device_alloc(DRVNAME, address);
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h
> index be41848c3cd2..44f79c5726a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
>  enum kinds { nct6106, nct6116, nct6775, nct6776, nct6779, nct6791, nct6792,
> -	     nct6793, nct6795, nct6796, nct6797, nct6798 };
> +	     nct6793, nct6795, nct6796, nct6797, nct6798, nct6799 };
>  enum pwm_enable { off, manual, thermal_cruise, speed_cruise, sf3, sf4 };
>  
>  #define NUM_TEMP	10	/* Max number of temp attribute sets w/ limits*/
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer
  2022-10-19 17:06 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-10-19 21:04   ` Denis Pauk
  2022-10-20 17:08     ` Ahmad Khalifa
  2022-10-20 16:54   ` Ahmad Khalifa
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Denis Pauk @ 2022-10-19 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: Ahmad Khalifa, Jean Delvare, linux-hwmon, Zev Weiss

Hi Ahmad,

Thank you for your patch. 

I will add mention of you patch in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204807 also. 

I have added my comments below.
 
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:34:29PM +0100, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
> New Asus X670 board firmware doesn't expose the WMI GUID used for
> the SIO/HWM methods. The driver's GUID isn't in the ACPI tables and
> the GUIDs that do exist do not expose the RSIO/WSIO and RHWM/WHWM
> methods (which do exist with same IDs).
> 
> 
> 1. There are quite a few drivers out there matching on Asus
> boards/guids for various purposes, even inside hwmon/, but the
> NCT6775 seems to be the best one for that.
> 2. The WMI device GUIDs do not reference the right method to call
> the SIO/HWM methods, but the control method WMBD is there in the
>    WMI device. It looks like WMI, but doesn't walk like WMI.
> 3. Access through IO will require an option to ignore ACPI
> conflicts as with other drivers since the resources are named in
> the ACPI tables.
> 
> The options seem to be:
> A. Ignore the firmware, but add ignore_resource_conflicts
> B. Proxy the calls through the ACPI method directly
> C. Find a way to insert a fake WMI device. In other words, add a WMI
>    driver that exposes the NCT's known GUID instead. This would
> still need 6799 support added in.
> 
> Below is a patch to demonstrate option B to add a layer to the ACPI
> method. (It's not in great shape, would need more work and to be
> split into 2, but for now just about showing the approach and
> driver's ability to read the NCT6799)
> 
> * Replicates the *asuswmi* methods into *asusacpi* and redirects
> them to ACPI
> * Determines WMI vs. ACPI access by matching against known board and
>   loops to find the ACPI device
> * Sets the access/callbacks to asusacpi
> * Finally, adds the NCT6779 device support as a replica of NCT6778  
> 
> Reading the device sensors is quite accurate for the first 2-3
> sensors, but further up the index, it needs more work as it's not
> the same map as the 6778.
>   
> 
> What would be the best approach to enable support for those boards?
>   
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Ahmad
> 
>    
> 
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c     |   8 +
>  drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c | 269
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h          |
>  2 +- 3 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c
> b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c index da9ec6983e13..709a43b7c93a
> 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-core.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>   *                                           (0xd451)
>   * nct6798d    14      7       7       2+6    0xd428 0xc1    0x5ca3
>   *                                           (0xd429)
> + * nct6799d    14      7       7       2+6    0xd802 0xc1    0x5ca3
>   *
>   * #temp lists the number of monitored temperature sources (first
> value) plus
>   * the number of directly connectable temperature sensors (second
> value). @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static const char * const
> nct6775_device_names[] = { "nct6796",
>  	"nct6797",
>  	"nct6798",
> +	"nct6799",
>  };
>  
>  /* Common and NCT6775 specific data */
> @@ -1109,6 +1111,7 @@ bool nct6775_reg_is_word_sized(struct
> nct6775_data *data, u16 reg) case nct6796:
>  	case nct6797:
>  	case nct6798:
> +	case nct6799:
>  		return reg == 0x150 || reg == 0x153 || reg ==
> 0x155 || (reg & 0xfff0) == 0x4c0 ||
>  		  reg == 0x402 ||
> @@ -1462,6 +1465,7 @@ static int nct6775_update_pwm_limits(struct
> device *dev) case nct6796:
>  		case nct6797:
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			err = nct6775_read_value(data,
> data->REG_CRITICAL_PWM_ENABLE[i], &reg); if (err)
>  				return err;
> @@ -3109,6 +3113,7 @@ store_auto_pwm(struct device *dev, struct
> device_attribute *attr, case nct6796:
>  		case nct6797:
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			err = nct6775_write_value(data,
> data->REG_CRITICAL_PWM[nr], val); if (err)
>  				break;
> @@ -3807,6 +3812,7 @@ int nct6775_probe(struct device *dev, struct
> nct6775_data *data, case nct6796:
>  	case nct6797:
>  	case nct6798:
> +	case nct6799:
>  		data->in_num = 15;
>  		data->pwm_num = (data->kind == nct6796 ||
>  				 data->kind == nct6797 ||
> @@ -3855,6 +3861,7 @@ int nct6775_probe(struct device *dev, struct
> nct6775_data *data, data->virt_temp_mask = NCT6796_VIRT_TEMP_MASK;
>  			break;
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			data->temp_label = nct6798_temp_label;
>  			data->temp_mask = NCT6798_TEMP_MASK;
>  			data->virt_temp_mask =
> NCT6798_VIRT_TEMP_MASK; @@ -3918,6 +3925,7 @@ int
> nct6775_probe(struct device *dev, struct nct6775_data *data, case
> nct6796: case nct6797:
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			data->REG_TSI_TEMP = NCT6796_REG_TSI_TEMP;
>  			num_reg_tsi_temp =
> ARRAY_SIZE(NCT6796_REG_TSI_TEMP); break;
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c
> b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c index b34783784213..6e44ed5eb13e
> 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>  
>  #include "nct6775.h"
>  
> -enum sensor_access { access_direct, access_asuswmi };
> +enum sensor_access { access_direct, access_asuswmi,
> access_asusacpi }; 
>  static const char * const nct6775_sio_names[] __initconst = {
>  	"NCT6106D",
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static const char * const nct6775_sio_names[]
> __initconst = { "NCT6796D",
>  	"NCT6797D",
>  	"NCT6798D",
> +	"NCT6799D",
>  };
>  
>  static unsigned short force_id;
> @@ -86,6 +87,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(fan_debounce, "Enable debouncing
> for fan RPM signal"); 
>  #define SIO_NCT6796_ID		0xd420
>  #define SIO_NCT6797_ID		0xd450
>  #define SIO_NCT6798_ID		0xd428
> +#define SIO_NCT6799_ID		0xd800  /* 0xd802 with
> revision */ #define SIO_ID_MASK		0xFFF8
>  
>  /*
> @@ -113,6 +115,16 @@ struct nct6775_sio_data {
>  #define ASUSWMI_METHODID_RHWM		0x5248574D
>  #define ASUSWMI_METHODID_WHWM		0x5748574D
>  #define ASUSWMI_UNSUPPORTED_METHOD	0xFFFFFFFE
> +/*
> + * Newer boards have an ACPI method not exposed through any WMI
> GUID
> + * so we call it directly through acpi.
> + * Same METHODID values can be used as with WMI
> + */
> +#define ASUSACPI_DEVICE_UID		"AsusMbSwInterface"
> +#define ASUSACPI_DEVICE_HID		"PNP0C14"
> +#define ASUSACPI_METHOD			"WMBD"
> +
> +struct acpi_device *asus_acpi_dev;
>  
>  static int nct6775_asuswmi_evaluate_method(u32 method_id, u8 bank,
> u8 reg, u8 val, u32 *retval) {
> @@ -192,6 +204,85 @@ static void superio_wmi_exit(struct
> nct6775_sio_data *sio_data) {
>  }
>  
> +
> +static int nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(u32 method_id, u8
> bank, u8 reg, u8 val, u32 *retval) +{
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
> +	u32 args = bank | (reg << 8) | (val << 16);
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	unsigned long long result;
> +	union acpi_object params[3];
> +	struct acpi_object_list input;
> +	acpi_handle handle = acpi_device_handle(asus_acpi_dev);
> +
> +	params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> +	params[0].integer.value = 0;
> +	params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> +	params[1].integer.value = method_id;
> +	params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
> +	params[2].buffer.length = sizeof(args);
> +	params[2].buffer.pointer = (void*)&args;
> +	input.count = 3;
> +	input.pointer = params;
> +
> +	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, ASUSACPI_METHOD,
> &input, &result);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	if (retval)
> +		*retval = (u32)result & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +#else
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static inline int nct6775_asusacpi_write(u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 val)
> +{
> +	return
> nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_WHWM, bank,
> +					      reg, val, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int nct6775_asusacpi_read(u8 bank, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> +{
> +	u32 ret, tmp = 0;
> +
> +	ret =
> nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_RHWM, bank,
> +					      reg, 0, &tmp);
> +	*val = tmp;
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int superio_acpi_inb(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int
> reg) +{
> +	int tmp = 0;
> +
> +	nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_RSIO,
> sio_data->ld,
> +					reg, 0, &tmp);
> +	return tmp;
> +}
> +
> +static void superio_acpi_outb(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data,
> int reg, int val) +{
> +	nct6775_asusacpi_evaluate_method(ASUSWMI_METHODID_WSIO,
> sio_data->ld,
> +					reg, val, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static void superio_acpi_select(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data,
> int ld) +{
> +	sio_data->ld = ld;
> +}
> +
Could be reused superio_wmi_select here with some more general name?
e.g rename superio_wmi_select -> superio_asus_select, or some other
name.
> +static int superio_acpi_enter(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
Could be reused superio_wmi_enter here with some more general name?
> +static void superio_acpi_exit(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
> +{
> +}
> +
Could be reused superio_wmi_exit here with some more general name?
>  static void superio_outb(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data, int
> reg, int val) {
>  	int ioreg = sio_data->sioreg;
> @@ -294,6 +385,58 @@ static int nct6775_wmi_reg_write(void *ctx,
> unsigned int reg, unsigned int value return res;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void nct6775_acpi_set_bank(struct nct6775_data
> *data, u16 reg) +{
> +	u8 bank = reg >> 8;
> +
> +	data->bank = bank;
> +}
> +
Could be reused nct6775_wmi_set_bank here?
> +static int nct6775_acpi_reg_read(void *ctx, unsigned int reg,
> unsigned int *val) +{
> +	struct nct6775_data *data = ctx;
> +	int err, word_sized = nct6775_reg_is_word_sized(data, reg);
> +	u8 tmp = 0;
> +	u16 res;
> +
> +	nct6775_acpi_set_bank(data, reg);
> +
> +	err = nct6775_asusacpi_read(data->bank, reg & 0xff, &tmp);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	res = tmp;
> +	if (word_sized) {
> +		err = nct6775_asusacpi_read(data->bank, (reg &
> 0xff) + 1, &tmp);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		res = (res << 8) + tmp;
> +	}
> +	*val = res;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int nct6775_acpi_reg_write(void *ctx, unsigned int reg,
> unsigned int value) +{
> +	struct nct6775_data *data = ctx;
> +	int res, word_sized = nct6775_reg_is_word_sized(data, reg);
> +
> +	nct6775_acpi_set_bank(data, reg);
> +
> +	if (word_sized) {
> +		res = nct6775_asusacpi_write(data->bank, reg &
> 0xff, value >> 8);
> +		if (res)
> +			return res;
> +
> +		res = nct6775_asusacpi_write(data->bank, (reg &
> 0xff) + 1, value);
> +	} else {
> +		res = nct6775_asusacpi_write(data->bank, reg &
> 0xff, value);
> +	}
> +
> +	return res;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * On older chips, only registers 0x50-0x5f are banked.
>   * On more recent chips, all registers are banked.
> @@ -408,7 +551,7 @@ static int nct6775_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	if (data->kind == nct6791 || data->kind == nct6792 ||
>  	    data->kind == nct6793 || data->kind == nct6795 ||
>  	    data->kind == nct6796 || data->kind == nct6797 ||
> -	    data->kind == nct6798)
> +	    data->kind == nct6798 || data->kind == nct6799)
>  		nct6791_enable_io_mapping(sio_data);
>  
>  	sio_data->sio_exit(sio_data);
> @@ -555,7 +698,7 @@ nct6775_check_fan_inputs(struct nct6775_data
> *data, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio } else {
>  		/*
>  		 * NCT6779D, NCT6791D, NCT6792D, NCT6793D,
> NCT6795D, NCT6796D,
> -		 * NCT6797D, NCT6798D
> +		 * NCT6797D, NCT6798D, NCT6799D
>  		 */
>  		int cr1a = sio_data->sio_inb(sio_data, 0x1a);
>  		int cr1b = sio_data->sio_inb(sio_data, 0x1b);
> @@ -670,6 +813,23 @@ nct6775_check_fan_inputs(struct nct6775_data
> *data, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio pwm6pin |= !(cred & BIT(2)) &&
> (cr2a & BIT(3)); pwm6pin |= (creb & BIT(4)) && !(cr2a & BIT(0));
>  
> +			pwm7pin = !(cr1d & (BIT(2) | BIT(3)));
> +			pwm7pin |= cr2d & BIT(7);
> +			pwm7pin |= creb & BIT(2);
> +			break;
> +		case nct6799:
Looks as same as for the previous one (nct6798). Have i missed some
reg difference? 
> +			fan6pin = !(cr1b & BIT(0)) && (cre0 &
> BIT(3));
> +			fan6pin |= cr2a & BIT(4);
> +			fan6pin |= creb & BIT(5);
> +
> +			fan7pin = cr1b & BIT(5);
> +			fan7pin |= !(cr2b & BIT(2));
> +			fan7pin |= creb & BIT(3);
> +
> +			pwm6pin = !(cr1b & BIT(0)) && (cre0 &
> BIT(4));
> +			pwm6pin |= !(cred & BIT(2)) && (cr2a &
> BIT(3));
> +			pwm6pin |= (creb & BIT(4)) && !(cr2a &
> BIT(0)); +
>  			pwm7pin = !(cr1d & (BIT(2) | BIT(3)));
>  			pwm7pin |= cr2d & BIT(7);
>  			pwm7pin |= creb & BIT(2);
> @@ -828,6 +988,7 @@ static int nct6775_platform_probe_init(struct
> nct6775_data *data) case nct6796:
>  	case nct6797:
>  	case nct6798:
> +	case nct6799:
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -866,6 +1027,7 @@ static int nct6775_platform_probe_init(struct
> nct6775_data *data) case nct6796:
>  		case nct6797:
>  		case nct6798:
> +		case nct6799:
>  			tmp |= 0x7e;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -895,6 +1057,13 @@ static const struct regmap_config
> nct6775_wmi_regmap_config = { .reg_write = nct6775_wmi_reg_write,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct regmap_config nct6775_acpi_regmap_config = {
> +	.reg_bits = 16,
> +	.val_bits = 16,
> +	.reg_read = nct6775_acpi_reg_read,
> +	.reg_write = nct6775_acpi_reg_write,
> +};
> +
>  static int nct6775_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -919,8 +1088,12 @@ static int nct6775_platform_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) if (sio_data->access == access_direct) {
>  		data->addr = res->start;
>  		regmapcfg = &nct6775_regmap_config;
> -	} else {
> +	} else if (sio_data->access == access_asuswmi) {
>  		regmapcfg = &nct6775_wmi_regmap_config;
> +	} else if (sio_data->access == access_asusacpi) {
> +		regmapcfg = &nct6775_acpi_regmap_config;
> +	} else {
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> @@ -995,6 +1168,9 @@ static int __init nct6775_find(int sioaddr,
> struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data) case SIO_NCT6798_ID:
>  		sio_data->kind = nct6798;
>  		break;
> +	case SIO_NCT6799_ID:
> +		sio_data->kind = nct6799;
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		if (val != 0xffff)
>  			pr_debug("unsupported chip ID: 0x%04x\n",
> val); @@ -1023,7 +1199,7 @@ static int __init nct6775_find(int
> sioaddr, struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data) if (sio_data->kind ==
> nct6791 || sio_data->kind == nct6792 || sio_data->kind == nct6793
> || sio_data->kind == nct6795 || sio_data->kind == nct6796 ||
> sio_data->kind == nct6797 ||
> -	    sio_data->kind == nct6798)
> +	    sio_data->kind == nct6798 || sio_data->kind == nct6799)
>  		nct6791_enable_io_mapping(sio_data);
>  
>  	sio_data->sio_exit(sio_data);
> @@ -1092,6 +1268,66 @@ static const char * const asus_wmi_boards[]
> = { "TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)",
>  };
>  
> +static const char * const asus_acpi_boards[] = {
> +	"ROG STRIX X670E-I GAMING WIFI",
> +};
> +/*
> + * Callback for acpi_bus_for_each_dev() to find the
> + * right device by _UID and _HID and stop.
> + * return is an error to exit the loop
> + */
> +static int nct6775_find_asus_acpi(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(dev);
> +	const char *uid = acpi_device_uid(adev);
> +	const char *hid = acpi_device_hid(adev);
> +
> +	if (uid && !strcmp(uid, ASUSACPI_DEVICE_UID) &&
> +		hid && !strcmp(hid, ASUSACPI_DEVICE_HID)) {
> +		asus_acpi_dev = adev;
> +		return -EEXIST;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static enum sensor_access nct6775_determine_access(const char
> *board_name) +{
> +	int ret;
> +	u8 tmp;
> +	enum sensor_access access = access_direct;
> +
> +	ret = match_string(asus_wmi_boards,
> ARRAY_SIZE(asus_wmi_boards),
> +				   board_name);
> +	if (ret >= 0) {
> +		/* if reading chip id via WMI succeeds, use WMI */
> +		if (!nct6775_asuswmi_read(0, NCT6775_PORT_CHIPID,
> &tmp) && tmp) {
> +			pr_info("Using Asus WMI to access %#x
> chip.\n", tmp);
> +			return access_asuswmi;
> +		} else {
> +			pr_err("Can't read ChipID by Asus
> WMI.\n");  
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* not WMI, try to find the ACPI device/method */
> +	ret = match_string(asus_acpi_boards,
> ARRAY_SIZE(asus_acpi_boards),
> +			board_name);
> +	if (ret >= 0) {
> +		acpi_bus_for_each_dev(nct6775_find_asus_acpi,
> &asus_acpi_dev);
> +		if (!asus_acpi_dev)
> +			return access;
> +		/* if reading chip id via ACPI succeeds, use ACPI
> */
> +		if (!nct6775_asusacpi_read(0, NCT6775_PORT_CHIPID,
> &tmp) && tmp) {
> +			pr_info("Using Asus ACPI to access %#x
> chip.\n", tmp);
> +			return access_asusacpi;
> +		} else {
> +			pr_err("Can't read ChipID by Asus
> ACPI.\n");
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return access;
> +}
> +
>  static int __init sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i, err;
> @@ -1102,7 +1338,6 @@ static int __init
> sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void) int sioaddr[2] = { 0x2e, 0x4e };
>  	enum sensor_access access = access_direct;
>  	const char *board_vendor, *board_name;
> -	u8 tmp;
>  
>  	err = platform_driver_register(&nct6775_driver);
>  	if (err)
> @@ -1111,20 +1346,10 @@ static int __init
> sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void) board_vendor =
> dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR); board_name =
> dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BOARD_NAME); 
> +	/* check if the board has WMI/ACPI access to the device */
>  	if (board_name && board_vendor &&
> -	    !strcmp(board_vendor, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.")) {
> -		err = match_string(asus_wmi_boards,
> ARRAY_SIZE(asus_wmi_boards),
> -				   board_name);
> -		if (err >= 0) {
> -			/* if reading chip id via WMI succeeds,
> use WMI */
> -			if (!nct6775_asuswmi_read(0,
> NCT6775_PORT_CHIPID, &tmp) && tmp) {
> -				pr_info("Using Asus WMI to access
> %#x chip.\n", tmp);
> -				access = access_asuswmi;
> -			} else {
> -				pr_err("Can't read ChipID by Asus
> WMI.\n");
> -			}
> -		}
> -	}
> +	    !strcmp(board_vendor, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."))
> +		access = nct6775_determine_access(board_name);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * initialize sio_data->kind and sio_data->sioreg.
> @@ -1154,6 +1379,12 @@ static int __init
> sensors_nct6775_platform_init(void) sio_data.sio_select =
> superio_wmi_select; sio_data.sio_enter = superio_wmi_enter;
>  			sio_data.sio_exit = superio_wmi_exit;
> +		}else if (access == access_asusacpi) {  
> +			sio_data.sio_outb = superio_acpi_outb;
> +			sio_data.sio_inb = superio_acpi_inb;
> +			sio_data.sio_select = superio_acpi_select;
> +			sio_data.sio_enter = superio_acpi_enter;
> +			sio_data.sio_exit = superio_acpi_exit;
>  		}
>  
>  		pdev[i] = platform_device_alloc(DRVNAME, address);
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h
> index be41848c3cd2..44f79c5726a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/nct6775.h
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
>  enum kinds { nct6106, nct6116, nct6775, nct6776, nct6779, nct6791,
> nct6792,
> -	     nct6793, nct6795, nct6796, nct6797, nct6798 };
> +	     nct6793, nct6795, nct6796, nct6797, nct6798, nct6799
> }; enum pwm_enable { off, manual, thermal_cruise, speed_cruise,
> sf3, sf4 }; 
>  #define NUM_TEMP	10	/* Max number of temp attribute
> sets w/ limits*/ -- 
> 2.30.2
>   

Best regards,
                  Denis.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer
  2022-10-19 17:06 ` Guenter Roeck
  2022-10-19 21:04   ` Denis Pauk
@ 2022-10-20 16:54   ` Ahmad Khalifa
  2022-10-20 20:04     ` Denis Pauk
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Khalifa @ 2022-10-20 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: Jean Delvare, linux-hwmon, Zev Weiss, Denis Pauk

On 19/10/2022 18:06, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:34:29PM +0100, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
>> * Finally, adds the NCT6779 device support as a replica of NCT6778
> NCT6799 / NCT6798 ?
>> Reading the device sensors is quite accurate for the first 2-3 sensors,
>> but further up the index, it needs more work as it's not the same map
>> as the 6778.
> 6798 ?

Correct, those were typos. Adding the 6799 based on closest number.

>> What would be the best approach to enable support for those boards?
> First, as I think you suggested as well, this needs to be (at least)
> two patches, one to add support for the new chip using existing methods,
> and another to enable accesses through ACPI.
> 
> Second, I don't have access to the chip datasheet. Historically it is
> unlikely that the chip is indeed a clone/replica of NCT6798.
> The comment above suggests that the chip is indeed not the same,
> so this will have to be resolved before anything can be accepted.

Ok, I'll focus on figuring out the registers for the connected sensors 
or finding a datasheet.

> Since the actual methods are the same, what is the benefit of keeping
> wmi access methods around ?

In theory, ACPI access is faster because WMI is an extra translation
layer on top, but at the same time nct6775 doesn't have to worry about 
finding the right device or registering with ACPI.

Did you mean to skip the WMI path, skip the WMBD control method and go 
straight for the read/write methods themselves? That's possible.

The tricky bit would be narrowing down which PNP0C14 device has those 
methods and then trying not to compete with the other WMI/EC drivers for 
Asus sensors (too many: asus-wmi-sensors, asus_atk0110, asus-ec-sensors)

I know the _UID for the board I have, but this probably shouldn't rely 
on _UIDs and have to cover all 50 boards that are already there.

Let me have a look at this.


> Last but not least, please run your patches through checkpatch.
> Couple of additional comments inline.

Thanks, I didn't know that was there.



-- 
Regards,
Ahmad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer
  2022-10-19 21:04   ` Denis Pauk
@ 2022-10-20 17:08     ` Ahmad Khalifa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Khalifa @ 2022-10-20 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Pauk, Guenter Roeck; +Cc: Jean Delvare, linux-hwmon, Zev Weiss

On 19/10/2022 22:04, Denis Pauk wrote:
> Hi Ahmad,
> 
> Thank you for your patch.
> 
> I will add mention of you patch in
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204807 also.

That's an interesting bug. It has loads of ACPI tables in there, which 
could be very useful.

The acpi patch is still a proof of concept and will show wrong values, I 
know the voltages and temperatures are mixed up or could even be pulling 
rubbish data that looks like a temperature.

I just wanted comments on where to go, thanks for the below.
There is definitely lots to fix up first.


> I have added my comments below.
>> +static void superio_acpi_select(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data,
>> int ld) +{
>> +	sio_data->ld = ld;
>> +}
>> +
> Could be reused superio_wmi_select here with some more general name?
> e.g rename superio_wmi_select -> superio_asus_select, or some other
> name.
>> +static int superio_acpi_enter(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void superio_acpi_exit(struct nct6775_sio_data *sio_data)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
> Could be reused superio_wmi_exit here with some more general name?

Yes, make them common for both.
Frankly, I replicated them mechanically so the patch is quicker to read 
without lots of +/- lines


>> +		case nct6799:
> Looks as same as for the previous one (nct6798). Have i missed some
> reg difference?

They're a replica, probably should've reused the above case.




-- 
Regards,
Ahmad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer
  2022-10-20 16:54   ` Ahmad Khalifa
@ 2022-10-20 20:04     ` Denis Pauk
  2022-10-20 21:53       ` Ahmad Khalifa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Denis Pauk @ 2022-10-20 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ahmad Khalifa; +Cc: Guenter Roeck, Jean Delvare, linux-hwmon, Zev Weiss

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:08:00 +0100
Ahmad Khalifa <ahmad@khalifa.ws> wrote:

> On 19/10/2022 22:04, Denis Pauk wrote:
> > Hi Ahmad,
> > 
> > Thank you for your patch.
> > 
> > I will add mention of you patch in
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204807 also.  
> 
> That's an interesting bug. It has loads of ACPI tables in there, which 
> could be very useful.
> 
> The acpi patch is still a proof of concept and will show wrong values, I 
> know the voltages and temperatures are mixed up or could even be pulling 
> rubbish data that looks like a temperature.
> 
> I just wanted comments on where to go, thanks for the below.
> There is definitely lots to fix up first.
> 
> 

You also can use https://github.com/asus-wmi-boards-sensors/asus-board-dsdt, I
have collected DSDT from bugs and asus support site. I suppose
that all ASUS X670 bioses will have same dsdt definitions.

Some of dumps contains register definition like in P8H67-ASUS:

```
IndexField (HIDX, HDAT, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
{
	Offset (0x04), 
	CHNM,   1, 
....
	VCOR,   8, 
	V12V,   8, 
	Offset (0x23), 
	V33V,   8, 
	V50V,   8, 
....
}

```

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:34:29PM +0100, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
> New Asus X670 board firmware doesn't expose the WMI GUID used for the
> SIO/HWM methods. The driver's GUID isn't in the ACPI tables and the
> GUIDs that do exist do not expose the RSIO/WSIO and RHWM/WHWM methods
> (which do exist with same IDs).
> 

Have you caught differences in DSDT definition that broke WMI call? 
I see similar definition of WMI methods in X570 and X670 dsdt and by first look
everything should be good. 

Like:
X670
```
....
Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0C14") /* Windows Management Instrumentation Device */)
 // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_UID, "AsusMbSwInterface")  // _UID: Unique ID
Name (_WDG, Buffer (0x3C)
{
	/* 0000 */  0xD0, 0x5E, 0x84, 0x97, 0x6D, 0x4E, 0xDE, 0x11,  // .^..mN..
	/* 0008 */  0x8A, 0x39, 0x08, 0x00, 0x20, 0x0C, 0x9A, 0x66,  // .9.. ..f
	/* 0010 */  0x42, 0x43, 0x01, 0x02, 0x72, 0x0F, 0xBC, 0xAB,  // BC..r...
	/* 0018 */  0xA1, 0x8E, 0xD1, 0x11, 0x00, 0xA0, 0xC9, 0x06,  // ........
	/* 0020 */  0x29, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0xD2, 0x00, 0x01, 0x08,  // ).......
	/* 0028 */  0x21, 0x12, 0x90, 0x05, 0x66, 0xD5, 0xD1, 0x11,  // !...f...
	/* 0030 */  0xB2, 0xF0, 0x00, 0xA0, 0xC9, 0x06, 0x29, 0x10,  // ......).
	/* 0038 */  0x4D, 0x4F, 0x01, 0x00                           // MO..
})
.....
Method (WMBD, 3, Serialized)
{
	Local0 = One
	Switch (Arg1)
	{
....
		Case (0x5253494F) +
		{
			Return (RSIO (Arg2))
		}
		Case (0x5753494F) +
		{
			Return (WSIO (Arg2))
		}
		Case (0x5248574D) +
		{
			Return (RHWM (Arg2))
		}
		Case (0x5748574D) +
		{
			Return (WHWM (Arg2))
		}
......
		Default
		{
			Return (Zero)
		}

	}

	Return (Local0)
}
```

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer
  2022-10-20 20:04     ` Denis Pauk
@ 2022-10-20 21:53       ` Ahmad Khalifa
  2022-10-21  5:53         ` Denis Pauk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Khalifa @ 2022-10-20 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Pauk; +Cc: Guenter Roeck, Jean Delvare, linux-hwmon, Zev Weiss

On 20/10/2022 21:04, Denis Pauk wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:08:00 +0100
> Ahmad Khalifa <ahmad@khalifa.ws> wrote:
> 
>> On 19/10/2022 22:04, Denis Pauk wrote:
>>> Hi Ahmad,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your patch.
>>>
>>> I will add mention of you patch in
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204807 also.
>>
>> That's an interesting bug. It has loads of ACPI tables in there, which
>> could be very useful.
>>
>> The acpi patch is still a proof of concept and will show wrong values, I
>> know the voltages and temperatures are mixed up or could even be pulling
>> rubbish data that looks like a temperature.
>>
>> I just wanted comments on where to go, thanks for the below.
>> There is definitely lots to fix up first.
>>
>>
> 
> You also can use https://github.com/asus-wmi-boards-sensors/asus-board-dsdt, I
> have collected DSDT from bugs and asus support site. I suppose
> that all ASUS X670 bioses will have same dsdt definitions.

This is massive, extracted and all. I'll need to go through this for 
sure. Many thanks for this repo.

I don't think the X670 platform motherboards will have the same ACPI 
tables. For example, ATX vs ITX, STRIX vs CROSSHAIR, different 
peripherals/configurations.


> Some of dumps contains register definition like in P8H67-ASUS:
> 
> ```
> IndexField (HIDX, HDAT, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
> {
> 	Offset (0x04),
> 	CHNM,   1,
> ....
> 	VCOR,   8,
> 	V12V,   8,
> 	Offset (0x23),
> 	V33V,   8,
> 	V50V,   8,
> ....
> }
> 
> ```
> 
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:34:29PM +0100, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
>> New Asus X670 board firmware doesn't expose the WMI GUID used for the
>> SIO/HWM methods. The driver's GUID isn't in the ACPI tables and the
>> GUIDs that do exist do not expose the RSIO/WSIO and RHWM/WHWM methods
>> (which do exist with same IDs).
>>
> 
> Have you caught differences in DSDT definition that broke WMI call?
> I see similar definition of WMI methods in X570 and X670 dsdt and by first look
> everything should be good.

It looks like WMI, but the GUID below is pointing at WMBC only, whereas 
you'd expect the 'BD' characters to be in there to access it through the 
WMI bus.

The hwmon drivers point at:
nct6775:             466747A0-70EC-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66
asus_wmi_sensors:    466747A0-70EC-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66

but the new board (from below) has:
X670 :               97845ED0-4E6D-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66

The change in the first 2 segments might be indicative here, hence why I 
didn't think they just 'forgot' the GUID in this firmware

Anyway way, Geunter's idea from the other thread about reaching for the 
read/write methods directly might just be better here. No need to 
struggle with GUIDs that can change if Asus will always expose the 
methods. I'll go through your repo and see if I can confirm that.


> 
> Like:
> X670
> ```
> ....
> Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0C14") /* Windows Management Instrumentation Device */)
>   // _HID: Hardware ID
> Name (_UID, "AsusMbSwInterface")  // _UID: Unique ID
> Name (_WDG, Buffer (0x3C)
> {
> 	/* 0000 */  0xD0, 0x5E, 0x84, 0x97, 0x6D, 0x4E, 0xDE, 0x11,  // .^..mN..
> 	/* 0008 */  0x8A, 0x39, 0x08, 0x00, 0x20, 0x0C, 0x9A, 0x66,  // .9.. ..f
> 	/* 0010 */  0x42, 0x43, 0x01, 0x02, 0x72, 0x0F, 0xBC, 0xAB,  // BC..r...
> 	/* 0018 */  0xA1, 0x8E, 0xD1, 0x11, 0x00, 0xA0, 0xC9, 0x06,  // ........
> 	/* 0020 */  0x29, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0xD2, 0x00, 0x01, 0x08,  // ).......
> 	/* 0028 */  0x21, 0x12, 0x90, 0x05, 0x66, 0xD5, 0xD1, 0x11,  // !...f...
> 	/* 0030 */  0xB2, 0xF0, 0x00, 0xA0, 0xC9, 0x06, 0x29, 0x10,  // ......).
> 	/* 0038 */  0x4D, 0x4F, 0x01, 0x00                           // MO..
> })
> .....
> Method (WMBD, 3, Serialized)
> {
> 	Local0 = One
> 	Switch (Arg1)
> 	{
> ....
> 		Case (0x5253494F) +
> 		{
> 			Return (RSIO (Arg2))
> 		}
> 		Case (0x5753494F) +
> 		{
> 			Return (WSIO (Arg2))
> 		}
> 		Case (0x5248574D) +
> 		{
> 			Return (RHWM (Arg2))
> 		}
> 		Case (0x5748574D) +
> 		{
> 			Return (WHWM (Arg2))
> 		}
> ......
> 		Default
> 		{
> 			Return (Zero)
> 		}
> 
> 	}
> 
> 	Return (Local0)
> }
> ```


-- 
Regards,
Ahmad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer
  2022-10-20 21:53       ` Ahmad Khalifa
@ 2022-10-21  5:53         ` Denis Pauk
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Denis Pauk @ 2022-10-21  5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ahmad Khalifa; +Cc: Guenter Roeck, Jean Delvare, linux-hwmon, Zev Weiss

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:53:22 +0100
Ahmad Khalifa <ahmad@khalifa.ws> wrote:

> On 20/10/2022 21:04, Denis Pauk wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:08:00 +0100
> > Ahmad Khalifa <ahmad@khalifa.ws> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 19/10/2022 22:04, Denis Pauk wrote:  
> >>> Hi Ahmad,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for your patch.
> >>>
> >>> I will add mention of you patch in
> >>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204807 also.  
> >>
> >> That's an interesting bug. It has loads of ACPI tables in there, which
> >> could be very useful.
> >>
> >> The acpi patch is still a proof of concept and will show wrong values, I
> >> know the voltages and temperatures are mixed up or could even be pulling
> >> rubbish data that looks like a temperature.
> >>
> >> I just wanted comments on where to go, thanks for the below.
> >> There is definitely lots to fix up first.
> >>
> >>  
> > 
> > You also can use
> > https://github.com/asus-wmi-boards-sensors/asus-board-dsdt, I have
> > collected DSDT from bugs and asus support site. I suppose that all ASUS
> > X670 bioses will have same dsdt definitions.  
> 
> This is massive, extracted and all. I'll need to go through this for 
> sure. Many thanks for this repo.
> 
> I don't think the X670 platform motherboards will have the same ACPI 
> tables. For example, ATX vs ITX, STRIX vs CROSSHAIR, different 
> peripherals/configurations.
> 
> 

As I saw, GUID/methods is same for generation and all boards from same
generation used same monitor call without relation to it was AMD or Intel
platform.

Like:
* return list sensors with names and values(asus-wmi-sensors): 
  PRIME/CROSSHAIR/STRIX/ZENITH Intel X399/AMD B450
* proxy register access to sensors(nct6775):
  PRO/ProArt/PRIME/CROSSHAIR/STRIX/TUF Intel Z390+Z490/AMD B550+X570
* custom ec chip/register bank emulation for boards with water cooling
  support (asus-ec-sensors):
  PRIME/ProArt/CROSSHAIR/MAXIMUS Intel Z690 / AMD X470+B550+X570

And no information for boards from 2010's like P8H67. 

And change just GUID and use same methods(RSIO/WSIO/RHWM/WHWM) is good news.

> > Some of dumps contains register definition like in P8H67-ASUS:
> > 
> > ```
> > IndexField (HIDX, HDAT, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
> > {
> > 	Offset (0x04),
> > 	CHNM,   1,
> > ....
> > 	VCOR,   8,
> > 	V12V,   8,
> > 	Offset (0x23),
> > 	V33V,   8,
> > 	V50V,   8,
> > ....
> > }
> > 
> > ```
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:34:29PM +0100, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:  
> >> New Asus X670 board firmware doesn't expose the WMI GUID used for the
> >> SIO/HWM methods. The driver's GUID isn't in the ACPI tables and the
> >> GUIDs that do exist do not expose the RSIO/WSIO and RHWM/WHWM methods
> >> (which do exist with same IDs).
> >>  
> > 
> > Have you caught differences in DSDT definition that broke WMI call?
> > I see similar definition of WMI methods in X570 and X670 dsdt and by first
> > look everything should be good.  
> 
> It looks like WMI, but the GUID below is pointing at WMBC only, whereas 
> you'd expect the 'BD' characters to be in there to access it through the 
> WMI bus.
> 
> The hwmon drivers point at:
> nct6775:             466747A0-70EC-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66
> asus_wmi_sensors:    466747A0-70EC-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66
> 
> but the new board (from below) has:
> X670 :               97845ED0-4E6D-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66
> 
> The change in the first 2 segments might be indicative here, hence why I 
> didn't think they just 'forgot' the GUID in this firmware
> 
> Anyway way, Geunter's idea from the other thread about reaching for the 
> read/write methods directly might just be better here. No need to 
> struggle with GUIDs that can change if Asus will always expose the 
> methods. I'll go through your repo and see if I can confirm that.
> 
> 
> > 
> > Like:
> > X670
> > ```
> > ....
> > Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0C14") /* Windows Management Instrumentation Device
> > */) // _HID: Hardware ID
> > Name (_UID, "AsusMbSwInterface")  // _UID: Unique ID
> > Name (_WDG, Buffer (0x3C)
> > {
> > 	/* 0000 */  0xD0, 0x5E, 0x84, 0x97, 0x6D, 0x4E, 0xDE, 0x11,  //
> > .^..mN.. /* 0008 */  0x8A, 0x39, 0x08, 0x00, 0x20, 0x0C, 0x9A, 0x66,  //
> > .9.. ..f /* 0010 */  0x42, 0x43, 0x01, 0x02, 0x72, 0x0F, 0xBC, 0xAB,  //
> > BC..r... /* 0018 */  0xA1, 0x8E, 0xD1, 0x11, 0x00, 0xA0, 0xC9, 0x06,  //
> > ........ /* 0020 */  0x29, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0xD2, 0x00, 0x01, 0x08,  //
> > )....... /* 0028 */  0x21, 0x12, 0x90, 0x05, 0x66, 0xD5, 0xD1, 0x11,  //
> > !...f... /* 0030 */  0xB2, 0xF0, 0x00, 0xA0, 0xC9, 0x06, 0x29, 0x10,  //
> > ......). /* 0038 */  0x4D, 0x4F, 0x01, 0x00                           //
> > MO.. })
> > .....
> > Method (WMBD, 3, Serialized)
> > {
> > 	Local0 = One
> > 	Switch (Arg1)
> > 	{
> > ....
> > 		Case (0x5253494F) +
> > 		{
> > 			Return (RSIO (Arg2))
> > 		}
> > 		Case (0x5753494F) +
> > 		{
> > 			Return (WSIO (Arg2))
> > 		}
> > 		Case (0x5248574D) +
> > 		{
> > 			Return (RHWM (Arg2))
> > 		}
> > 		Case (0x5748574D) +
> > 		{
> > 			Return (WHWM (Arg2))
> > 		}
> > ......
> > 		Default
> > 		{
> > 			Return (Zero)
> > 		}
> > 
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	Return (Local0)
> > }
> > ```  
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-21  5:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-18 17:34 [RFC] hwmon: (nct6775) Add NCT6799 support through ACPI layer Ahmad Khalifa
2022-10-19 17:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-19 21:04   ` Denis Pauk
2022-10-20 17:08     ` Ahmad Khalifa
2022-10-20 16:54   ` Ahmad Khalifa
2022-10-20 20:04     ` Denis Pauk
2022-10-20 21:53       ` Ahmad Khalifa
2022-10-21  5:53         ` Denis Pauk

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.