From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B75C38A2D for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229549AbiJYJgN (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:36:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41174 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230206AbiJYJfc (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:35:32 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768C410041B for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 02:35:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666690523; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lvftHeHNcOf08pZv57LiQDWcQo1a9iOMgED/XOW2Ols=; b=ZaP6wLr8G6xHXQhDYdEn/pWYOO0QCUjgENCrOzT8lQDseubtiBTfY6ZTuwrEJB+TqZBjol us1WGvn4KQnNbZhg4fU4fg/Q82bF7ob6YL68TchoQ5vzCyCdFH5h+BGQ+rl0tbRQzV2nV3 +0pbA4hOK7DkHO68jwIw9fEYrOEiCuQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-531-h-Yn7lLqN3WrM13r2N4ehg-1; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 05:35:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: h-Yn7lLqN3WrM13r2N4ehg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D41811E75; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plouf.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.195.44]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBE9492CA2; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:35:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Benjamin Tissoires To: Greg KH , Jiri Kosina , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Cc: Tero Kristo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Tissoires Subject: [PATCH hid v11 08/14] selftests/hid: add tests for bpf_hid_hw_request Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:34:52 +0200 Message-Id: <20221025093458.457089-9-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221025093458.457089-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> References: <20221025093458.457089-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add tests for the newly implemented function. We test here only the GET_REPORT part because the other calls are pure HID protocol and won't infer the result of the test of the bpf hook. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires --- changes in v11: - use the new facility from selftests/hid no changes in v10 no changes in v9 no changes in v8 no changes in v7 changes in v6: - fixed copy/paste in prog_tests when calling ASSERT_OK - removed the need for memcpy now that kfuncs can access ctx changes in v5: - use the new hid_bpf_allocate_context() API - remove the need for ctx_in for syscall TEST_RUN changes in v3: - use the new hid_get_data API - directly use HID_FEATURE_REPORT and HID_REQ_GET_REPORT from uapi changes in v2: - split the series by bpf/libbpf/hid/selftests and samples --- tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c index a6daaadccfb5..7cd976b469b7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c @@ -83,12 +83,23 @@ static unsigned char rdesc[] = { 0xc0, /* END_COLLECTION */ }; +static u8 feature_data[] = { 1, 2 }; + struct attach_prog_args { int prog_fd; unsigned int hid; int retval; }; +struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args { + __u8 data[10]; + unsigned int hid; + int retval; + size_t size; + enum hid_report_type type; + __u8 request_type; +}; + #define ASSERT_OK(data) ASSERT_FALSE(data) #define ASSERT_OK_PTR(ptr) ASSERT_NE(NULL, ptr) @@ -156,7 +167,7 @@ static void uhid_destroy(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, int fd) static int uhid_event(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, int fd) { - struct uhid_event ev; + struct uhid_event ev, answer; ssize_t ret; memset(&ev, 0, sizeof(ev)); @@ -197,6 +208,15 @@ static int uhid_event(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, int fd) break; case UHID_GET_REPORT: UHID_LOG("UHID_GET_REPORT from uhid-dev"); + + answer.type = UHID_GET_REPORT_REPLY; + answer.u.get_report_reply.id = ev.u.get_report.id; + answer.u.get_report_reply.err = ev.u.get_report.rnum == 1 ? 0 : -EIO; + answer.u.get_report_reply.size = sizeof(feature_data); + memcpy(answer.u.get_report_reply.data, feature_data, sizeof(feature_data)); + + uhid_write(_metadata, fd, &answer); + break; case UHID_SET_REPORT: UHID_LOG("UHID_SET_REPORT from uhid-dev"); @@ -687,6 +707,40 @@ TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_hid_change_report) ASSERT_EQ(buf[2], 0) TH_LOG("leftovers_from_previous_test"); } +/* + * Attach hid_user_raw_request to the given uhid device, + * call the bpf program from userspace + * check that the program is called and does the expected. + */ +TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_hid_user_raw_request_call) +{ + struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args args = { + .retval = -1, + .type = HID_FEATURE_REPORT, + .request_type = HID_REQ_GET_REPORT, + .size = 10, + }; + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, tattrs, + .ctx_in = &args, + .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args), + ); + int err, prog_fd; + + LOAD_BPF; + + args.hid = self->hid_id; + args.data[0] = 1; /* report ID */ + + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(self->skel->progs.hid_user_raw_request); + + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &tattrs); + ASSERT_OK(err) TH_LOG("error while calling bpf_prog_test_run_opts"); + + ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 2); + + ASSERT_EQ(args.data[1], 2); +} + static int libbpf_print_fn(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *format, va_list args) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c index ee7529c47ad8..fde76f63927b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c @@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ extern __u8 *hid_bpf_get_data(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx, unsigned int offset, const size_t __sz) __ksym; extern int hid_bpf_attach_prog(unsigned int hid_id, int prog_fd, u32 flags) __ksym; +extern struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_bpf_allocate_context(unsigned int hid_id) __ksym; +extern void hid_bpf_release_context(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx) __ksym; +extern int hid_bpf_hw_request(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx, + __u8 *data, + size_t buf__sz, + enum hid_report_type type, + enum hid_class_request reqtype) __ksym; struct attach_prog_args { int prog_fd; @@ -56,3 +63,39 @@ int attach_prog(struct attach_prog_args *ctx) 0); return 0; } + +struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args { + /* data needs to come at offset 0 so we can use it in calls */ + __u8 data[10]; + unsigned int hid; + int retval; + size_t size; + enum hid_report_type type; + __u8 request_type; +}; + +SEC("syscall") +int hid_user_raw_request(struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args *args) +{ + struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx; + const size_t size = args->size; + int i, ret = 0; + + if (size > sizeof(args->data)) + return -7; /* -E2BIG */ + + ctx = hid_bpf_allocate_context(args->hid); + if (!ctx) + return -1; /* EPERM check */ + + ret = hid_bpf_hw_request(ctx, + args->data, + size, + args->type, + args->request_type); + args->retval = ret; + + hid_bpf_release_context(ctx); + + return 0; +} -- 2.36.1