From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02070FA373E for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234247AbiJZOR7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:17:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32772 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234289AbiJZORf (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:17:35 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33F1110B2C; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 07:17:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 29QEHP9v022475; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:17:25 +0200 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:17:25 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Rasmus Villemoes , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: add 7 tests for memcmp() Message-ID: <20221026141725.GB19206@1wt.eu> References: <20221021060340.7515-1-w@1wt.eu> <20221021155645.GK5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221021170134.GB8420@1wt.eu> <20221021170738.GM5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221021172026.GC8420@1wt.eu> <20221021180040.GN5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221022112228.GB30596@1wt.eu> <20221024155357.GZ5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20221026053922.GA19206@1wt.eu> <20221026135733.GK5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221026135733.GK5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 06:57:33AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 07:39:22AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 08:53:57AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > Will keep thinking about it and hopefully propose a patch to make the > > > > tests easier to use before we're too far in the 6.1 release. > > > > > > Another possibility is to have a separate developers' and maintainers' > > > option. Linus and I do "make whatever" for some value of "whatever" > > > that builds from scratch, doing whatever cleaning that might be required. > > > Developers use targets that are faster but have the possibility of false > > > positives and false negatives. > > > > > > But maybe you have something better in mind. > > > > > > > Thanks for keeping the conversation flowing, that helps me! > > > > > > Looking forward to seeing what you come up with! > > > > I could finally figure what was taking time in the installation process. > > Interestingly, it's "make headers", which is not redone without a "make > > clean" at the kernel level. The "make headers_install" only takes a few > > hundred milliseconds, so issuing a systematic "make clean" in the nolibc > > test dir only takes ~800ms here to perform a full rebuild, which is totally > > acceptable to me. > > > > Thus what I've done is to mark the sysroot target as .phony and start it > > with a removal of the current include dir so that we systematically rebuild > > it. Now there's no such risk of running a test against an earlier version > > anymore, and there are no "make clean" to worry about anymore either. > > That looks much better to me! > > > > And I could confirm that just issuing: > > > > $ time make -j8 -C tools/testing/selftests/nolibc run > > > > after reverting Rasmus' fix led me to this pretty quickly: > > > > ... > > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#3) > > make[1]: Leaving directory '/k' > > 15 memcmp_20_e0 = 64 [FAIL] > > 16 memcmp_e0_20 = -64 [FAIL] > > See all results in /k/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run.out > > make: Leaving directory '/k/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc' > > > > real 0m14.538s > > user 0m27.828s > > sys 0m4.576s > > > > No more false positives nor false negatives anymore. I'm sending you > > the patch separately. > > > > Thanks for the discussion, the solution is way better now! > > Nice, looking forward to the patch! In case you don't have it, it's this one: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221026054508.19634-1-w@1wt.eu/ Do not hesitate to let me know if I should resend it. Thanks! Willy