From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-nilfs <linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org>, syzbot <syzbot+e91619dd4c11c4960706@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nilfs2: fix shift-out-of-bounds/overflow in nilfs_sb2_bad_offset() Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:43:05 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20221027044306.42774-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20221027044306.42774-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> If the block size exponent information written in an on-disk superblock is corrupted, nilfs_sb2_bad_offset helper function can trigger shift-out-of-bounds warning followed by a kernel panic (if panic_on_warn is set): shift exponent 38983 is too large for 64-bit type 'unsigned long long' Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:151 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x33d/0x3b0 lib/ubsan.c:322 nilfs_sb2_bad_offset fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:449 [inline] nilfs_load_super_block+0xdf5/0xe00 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:523 init_nilfs+0xb7/0x7d0 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:577 nilfs_fill_super+0xb1/0x5d0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:1047 nilfs_mount+0x613/0x9b0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:1317 ... In addition, since nilfs_sb2_bad_offset() performs multiplication without considering the upper bound, the computation may overflow if the disk layout parameters are not normal. This fixes these issues by inserting preliminary sanity checks for those parameters and by converting the comparison from one involving multiplication and left bit-shifting to one using division and right bit-shifting. Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+e91619dd4c11c4960706@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> --- fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c index 3b4a079c9617..d588816fdf2f 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include <linux/blkdev.h> #include <linux/backing-dev.h> #include <linux/random.h> +#include <linux/log2.h> #include <linux/crc32.h> #include "nilfs.h" #include "segment.h" @@ -443,11 +444,33 @@ static int nilfs_valid_sb(struct nilfs_super_block *sbp) return crc == le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_sum); } -static int nilfs_sb2_bad_offset(struct nilfs_super_block *sbp, u64 offset) +/** + * nilfs_sb2_bad_offset - check the location of the second superblock + * @sbp: superblock raw data buffer + * @offset: byte offset of second superblock calculated from device size + * + * nilfs_sb2_bad_offset() checks if the position on the second + * superblock is valid or not based on the filesystem parameters + * stored in @sbp. If @offset points to a location within the segment + * area, or if the parameters themselves are not normal, it is + * determined to be invalid. + * + * Return Value: true if invalid, false if valid. + */ +static bool nilfs_sb2_bad_offset(struct nilfs_super_block *sbp, u64 offset) { - return offset < ((le64_to_cpu(sbp->s_nsegments) * - le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_blocks_per_segment)) << - (le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_log_block_size) + 10)); + unsigned int shift_bits = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_log_block_size); + u32 blocks_per_segment = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_blocks_per_segment); + u64 nsegments = le64_to_cpu(sbp->s_nsegments); + u64 index; + + if (blocks_per_segment < NILFS_SEG_MIN_BLOCKS || + shift_bits > ilog2(NILFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE) - BLOCK_SIZE_BITS) + return true; + + index = offset >> (shift_bits + BLOCK_SIZE_BITS); + do_div(index, blocks_per_segment); + return index < nsegments; } static void nilfs_release_super_block(struct the_nilfs *nilfs) -- 2.34.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Cc: linux-nilfs <linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, syzbot <syzbot+e91619dd4c11c4960706-Pl5Pbv+GP7P466ipTTIvnc23WoclnBCfAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>, syzkaller-bugs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nilfs2: fix shift-out-of-bounds/overflow in nilfs_sb2_bad_offset() Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:43:05 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20221027044306.42774-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20221027044306.42774-1-konishi.ryusuke-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> If the block size exponent information written in an on-disk superblock is corrupted, nilfs_sb2_bad_offset helper function can trigger shift-out-of-bounds warning followed by a kernel panic (if panic_on_warn is set): shift exponent 38983 is too large for 64-bit type 'unsigned long long' Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:151 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x33d/0x3b0 lib/ubsan.c:322 nilfs_sb2_bad_offset fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:449 [inline] nilfs_load_super_block+0xdf5/0xe00 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:523 init_nilfs+0xb7/0x7d0 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:577 nilfs_fill_super+0xb1/0x5d0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:1047 nilfs_mount+0x613/0x9b0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:1317 ... In addition, since nilfs_sb2_bad_offset() performs multiplication without considering the upper bound, the computation may overflow if the disk layout parameters are not normal. This fixes these issues by inserting preliminary sanity checks for those parameters and by converting the comparison from one involving multiplication and left bit-shifting to one using division and right bit-shifting. Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Reported-by: syzbot+e91619dd4c11c4960706-Pl5Pbv+GP7P466ipTTIvnc23WoclnBCfAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> --- fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c index 3b4a079c9617..d588816fdf2f 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include <linux/blkdev.h> #include <linux/backing-dev.h> #include <linux/random.h> +#include <linux/log2.h> #include <linux/crc32.h> #include "nilfs.h" #include "segment.h" @@ -443,11 +444,33 @@ static int nilfs_valid_sb(struct nilfs_super_block *sbp) return crc == le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_sum); } -static int nilfs_sb2_bad_offset(struct nilfs_super_block *sbp, u64 offset) +/** + * nilfs_sb2_bad_offset - check the location of the second superblock + * @sbp: superblock raw data buffer + * @offset: byte offset of second superblock calculated from device size + * + * nilfs_sb2_bad_offset() checks if the position on the second + * superblock is valid or not based on the filesystem parameters + * stored in @sbp. If @offset points to a location within the segment + * area, or if the parameters themselves are not normal, it is + * determined to be invalid. + * + * Return Value: true if invalid, false if valid. + */ +static bool nilfs_sb2_bad_offset(struct nilfs_super_block *sbp, u64 offset) { - return offset < ((le64_to_cpu(sbp->s_nsegments) * - le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_blocks_per_segment)) << - (le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_log_block_size) + 10)); + unsigned int shift_bits = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_log_block_size); + u32 blocks_per_segment = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_blocks_per_segment); + u64 nsegments = le64_to_cpu(sbp->s_nsegments); + u64 index; + + if (blocks_per_segment < NILFS_SEG_MIN_BLOCKS || + shift_bits > ilog2(NILFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE) - BLOCK_SIZE_BITS) + return true; + + index = offset >> (shift_bits + BLOCK_SIZE_BITS); + do_div(index, blocks_per_segment); + return index < nsegments; } static void nilfs_release_super_block(struct the_nilfs *nilfs) -- 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 4:43 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-10-27 4:43 [PATCH 0/2] nilfs2: fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warnings on mount time Ryusuke Konishi 2022-10-27 4:43 ` Ryusuke Konishi 2022-10-27 4:43 ` Ryusuke Konishi [this message] 2022-10-27 4:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] nilfs2: fix shift-out-of-bounds/overflow in nilfs_sb2_bad_offset() Ryusuke Konishi 2022-10-27 4:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] nilfs2: fix shift-out-of-bounds due to too large exponent of block size Ryusuke Konishi 2022-10-27 4:43 ` Ryusuke Konishi
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20221027044306.42774-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \ --to=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=syzbot+e91619dd4c11c4960706@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \ --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.