On 26.10.2022 20:53:54, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() from hardware interrupt
> context or with interrupts being disabled. So replace kfree_skb()
> with dev_kfree_skb_irq() under spin_lock_irqsave().
> 
> Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  net/can/j1939/transport.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> index d7d86c944d76..b95fb759c49d 100644
> --- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> +++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static void j1939_session_skb_drop_old(struct j1939_session *session)
>  		/* drop ref taken in j1939_session_skb_queue() */
>  		skb_unref(do_skb);
>  
> -		kfree_skb(do_skb);
> +		dev_kfree_skb_irq(do_skb);

Can you call spin_unlock_irqrestore() before the kfree_skb()? Does that
fix the problem?

>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->skb_queue.lock, flags);
>  }

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |