All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, Tristram.Ha@microchip.com,
	f.fainelli@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next v2 3/8] net: dsa: microchip: Initial hardware time stamping support
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 16:14:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221124141456.ruxxiu7bfmsihz35@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d7df00d4c3a5228571fd408ea7ca3d71885bf6f.camel@microchip.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:52:46AM +0000, Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com wrote:
> Mistake here. It is carried forwarded from Christian Eggers patch.

Still taken from sja1105_hwtstamp_set(). Anyway, doesn't matter where
it's taken from, as long as it has a justification for being there.

> > Why do you need to call hwtstamp_set_state anyway?
> 
> In tag_ksz.c, xmit function query this state, to determine whether to
> allocate the 4 PTP timestamp bytes in the skb_buffer or not. Using this
> tagger_data set state, ptp enable and disable is communicated between
> ksz_ptp.c and tag_ksz.c

Why do you need to query this state in particular, considering that the
skb goes first through the port_txtstamp() dsa_switch_ops function?
Can't you just check there if TX timestamping is enabled, and leave a
mark in KSZ_SKB_CB()?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-24 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21 15:41 [RFC Patch net-next v2 0/8] net: dsa: microchip: add PTP support for KSZ9x and LAN937x Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-21 15:41 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 1/8] net: ptp: add helper for one-step P2P clocks Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-22 14:34   ` Richard Cochran
2022-11-23  7:10     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-24 14:52       ` Richard Cochran
2022-11-21 15:41 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 2/8] net: dsa: microchip: adding the posix clock support Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-21 21:33   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-21 22:01   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-21 15:41 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 3/8] net: dsa: microchip: Initial hardware time stamping support Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-21 23:13   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-23 13:57     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-24 10:22       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-24 10:52         ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-24 14:14           ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-11-25  7:06             ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-25 21:40               ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-21 15:41 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 4/8] net: dsa: microchip: Manipulating absolute time using ptp hw clock Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-21 15:41 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 5/8] net: dsa: microchip: enable the ptp interrupt for timestamping Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-21 15:41 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 6/8] net: dsa: microchip: Adding the ptp packet reception logic Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-22 20:24   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-23  0:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-23  2:28   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-23  6:40   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-21 15:41 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 7/8] net: dsa: microchip: add the transmission tstamp logic Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-21 22:51   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-23  8:49     ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-11-21 15:41 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 8/8] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add periodic output signal Arun Ramadoss
2022-11-22 14:36   ` Richard Cochran
2022-11-22 14:38   ` Richard Cochran
2022-11-21 21:17 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 0/8] net: dsa: microchip: add PTP support for KSZ9x and LAN937x Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221124141456.ruxxiu7bfmsihz35@skbuf \
    --to=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com \
    --cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=Woojung.Huh@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.