All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zbigniew Kempczyński" <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
To: Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib/i915_blt: Remove src == dst pitch restriction
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 19:57:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221214185747.4rc32vo6tnwampth@zkempczy-mobl2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7a22cbd-496e-648a-696d-704434a3251b@intel.com>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 04:37:26PM +0100, Karolina Stolarek wrote:
> On 12.12.2022 13:50, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> > During debugging phase we established there's not necessary to enforce
> > same pitch for destination surface in FULL_RESOLVE mode. Relax this
> > condition allowing caller to pass requirement surface configuration.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   lib/i915/i915_blt.c | 8 +++-----
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/i915/i915_blt.c b/lib/i915/i915_blt.c
> > index 3776c56c60..42c28623f9 100644
> > --- a/lib/i915/i915_blt.c
> > +++ b/lib/i915/i915_blt.c
> > @@ -317,13 +317,11 @@ static void fill_data(struct gen12_block_copy_data *data,
> >   	data->dw00.special_mode = __special_mode(blt);
> >   	data->dw00.length = extended_command ? 20 : 10;
> > -	if (__special_mode(blt) == SM_FULL_RESOLVE && blt->src.tiling == T_TILE64) {
> > -		data->dw01.dst_pitch = blt->src.pitch - 1;
> > +	if (__special_mode(blt) == SM_FULL_RESOLVE)
> 
> "blt->src.tiling == T_TILE64" part was introduced in commit cdc0258a4672
> ("lib/i915_blt: Narrow setting same pitch and aux-ccs to Tile64 only").
> I know it's a bit nit-picky, but could we revert that change (as it looks
> like it's not necessary), and have a separate commit that removes
> data->dw01.dst_pitch = blt->src.pitch - 1?

Two reverts would be necessary: cdc0258a467 and 229bb0accbb7 so single commit
against three looks better for me. Tiling inplace testing is still in progress.
If you think better is to revert above and add another commit I'll do it.

> 
> The question remains -- what actually caused the regression for Tile4 and
> xmajor? Was it because of the pitch settings? I run the tests a couple of
> times in the row after applying this patch and everything worked as
> expected.

Yes, dst pitch influences on destination surface state. For cascaded 
src->mid->dst mid.pitch may differ from dst.pitch (tileX -> linear blit).
For inplace there's some side effect which we're debugging now.

--
Zbigniew 

> 
> All the best,
> Karolina
> 
> >   		data->dw01.dst_aux_mode = __aux_mode(&blt->src);
> > -	} else {
> > -		data->dw01.dst_pitch = blt->dst.pitch - 1;
> > +	else
> >   		data->dw01.dst_aux_mode = __aux_mode(&blt->dst);
> > -	}
> > +	data->dw01.dst_pitch = blt->dst.pitch - 1;
> >   	data->dw01.dst_mocs = blt->dst.mocs;
> >   	data->dw01.dst_compression = blt->dst.compression;

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-14 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-12 12:50 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Add block-multicopy-* subtests Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-12-12 12:50 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib/i915_blt: Remove src == dst pitch restriction Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-12-13 15:37   ` Karolina Stolarek
2022-12-14 18:57     ` Zbigniew Kempczyński [this message]
2022-12-15  8:41       ` Karolina Stolarek
2022-12-15 10:43         ` Karolina Stolarek
2022-12-12 12:50 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib/i915_blt: Extract blit emit functions Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-12-13 15:39   ` Karolina Stolarek
2022-12-14 19:40     ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-12-15  8:42       ` Karolina Stolarek
2022-12-15 10:41         ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-12-15 10:47           ` Karolina Stolarek
2022-12-12 12:50 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/gem_ccs: Add block-multicopy subtest Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-12-13 15:40   ` Karolina Stolarek
2022-12-14 19:57     ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-12-15  8:42       ` Karolina Stolarek
2022-12-15 11:00         ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2022-12-15 11:47           ` Karolina Stolarek
2022-12-12 13:23 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Add block-multicopy-* subtests Patchwork
2022-12-12 21:05 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221214185747.4rc32vo6tnwampth@zkempczy-mobl2 \
    --to=zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=karolina.stolarek@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.