All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>,
	<joannelkoong@gmail.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL] Networking for next-6.1
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:28:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221220062844.26368-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bb57ae6-c2a7-e6ea-3fe8-62b8b61bc7c5@kernel.org>

From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 07:22:56 +0100
> On 19. 12. 22, 0:25, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
> > Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:49:01 +0100
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 04. 10. 22, 7:20, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >>> Joanne Koong (7):
> >>
> >>>         net: Add a bhash2 table hashed by port and address
> >>
> >> This makes regression tests of python-ephemeral-port-reserve to fail.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if the issue is in the commit or in the test.
> > 
> > Hi Jiri,
> > 
> > Thanks for reporting the issue.
> > 
> > It seems we forgot to add TIME_WAIT sockets into bhash2 in
> > inet_twsk_hashdance(), therefore inet_bhash2_conflict() misses
> > TIME_WAIT sockets when validating bind() requests if the address
> > is not a wildcard one.
> > 
> > I'll fix it.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> is there a fix for this available somewhere yet?

Not yet, but I'll CC you when posting a patch.

Thank you.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-20  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-04  5:20 [PULL] Networking for next-6.1 Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-04 21:40 ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-12-16 10:49 ` Jiri Slaby
2022-12-18 23:25   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2022-12-20  6:22     ` Jiri Slaby
2022-12-20  6:28       ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2022-12-21 11:30   ` [PULL] Networking for next-6.1 #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-12-22 12:20     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-01-30 15:19       ` Linux kernel regression tracking (#update)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221220062844.26368-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.