From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oi1-f174.google.com (mail-oi1-f174.google.com [209.85.167.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5140F4C75 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f174.google.com with SMTP id s186so10964738oia.5 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:11:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=0nqVemB5NAW8Opb3ZlNFskEE6ackCvwbZHpBlW+CEzU=; b=Lw3RYRPrt5CsG/F80OVaJpBpo1+1aPazHI9eR3wxDkd72rUvLTnr/o2KwGKah3nnJ/ Gxfuw0PcR/8+hHifhxJP1ebrHm0whKWJoJHPiEwPWkcAZbpYD/dxc/a+QDBhLCSZ07Fe 1I8c2uAyJ/wV+5O6VPUt0UU7SQ8YwPEkZx5yGQUI7tLO5NhjPnPSiniA/BbaVKIUUPvm hlNHxg8bUO7poz5nMdZsKd5SjTzViACgGG6A6gnP6n/CuU/5RRdx+G4T9jjPi+hZiAn0 J+aT6QOGqqMc6w5RHF5To+oV7cAYKTKFm9g1Mn3Uc+c073df1IYNCQY3aIQxdbv5wtjv doOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0nqVemB5NAW8Opb3ZlNFskEE6ackCvwbZHpBlW+CEzU=; b=V0T2Cb+OURAjhbewoz7woNyYGOMyw2e7LRA+ezaGXKggIrRxQkOgrGF5QtrF816mSy iA0+Ukizj4on4MDogB9ZmzGD0NF8VuMq73Fo2v/RYq/T3GK7RXBrcDpO/ubXytxC+TAr raFA+YgqAHqrCNQdxnj2+L+fGbfsGjjFl7+s0BVX9JF21ZbqiXTYDneMZr5f/vFkTiSV 2xqkQo4cdNIBQeKeoIq+7AYw9iIrFEOg+ER5ytoWQefOyuVlF0eNnaONowxHoH6roMK0 jAXfu8etDAAcGZDQ39CAcDR/8IKQ5vC9Fs3ghH7Kx90DT17qNMHY4QFOKJrXr8da7m9V Lwag== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krORg+1dWsuo+y51SQriSVvi9LnuY7W0RZjL/WhzQY+qojkl5St 8XAZkWRRogR4cDeV5+2rzXI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsWsGlu/AHcFFzt8quemYx+kRMP2DB1Pf5xDEub/X32Us+pjyG/4psspaaVA1dIyQ6StI/dTw== X-Received: by 2002:aca:5ec3:0:b0:35e:de12:d768 with SMTP id s186-20020aca5ec3000000b0035ede12d768mr8438517oib.53.1671552697389; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id et1-20020a056808280100b00359a9663053sm5660017oib.4.2022.12.20.08.11.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:11:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:11:35 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review Message-ID: <20221220161135.GA1983195@roeck-us.net> References: <20221219182943.395169070@linuxfoundation.org> <20221220150049.GE3748047@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 04:10:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:00:49AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release. > > > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > Build results: > > total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0 > > Qemu test results: > > total: 500 pass: 498 fail: 2 > > Failed tests: > > arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:net,default:zynq-zc702:rootfs > > arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:zynq-zed:rootfs > > > > The failure bisects to commit e013ba1e4e12 ("usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on > > ulpi_read_id timeout") and is inherited from mainline. Reverting the offending > > patch fixes the problem. > > Odd, yet that same commit works just fine on 6.0 and 5.15 and 5.10? I > hadn't had any reports of this being an issue on Linus's tree either, > did I miss those? > I testbed has a bad hair day. The reports for the other branches are wrong. I restarted the tests and expect them to fail there as well. Sorry for that. You probably didn't see any reports on mainline because I didn't report the issue there yet. There are so many failures in mainline that it is a bit difficult to keep up. This would be a full-time job, and I just don't have that much time, sorry. Guenter