From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71CA6C4167B for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B49881420; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:50:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 1B49881420 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7cu-DhNAnPxL; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DD280C2B; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:50:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 07DD280C2B Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A2B1BF37A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE5B40386 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:50:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 1CE5B40386 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvwvy605fozc for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:50:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org E7CD340260 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::223]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7CD340260 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E33D360004; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:49:57 +0100 To: James Hilliard Message-ID: <20221227214957.3ec9866e@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20221224013507.2479567-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com> References: <20221224013507.2479567-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.35; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1672174199; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=597JQycjeN0267VKpoiMWmduT2PH4++W0dKGj6KdhHQ=; b=WjOhDjVW+8j8jVgZwVJzKRVUk9S1VjvZs/kLTd5WmLO/ADFkwmrESIFIlzlagUHWlWBRWJ kI6zIup+FirB+S7WewtH4x6ARyOZHAyZiN6aVbYRKwrQxaR+U58LV/1Zc6KR1ZlC8gFkV+ TK6bRcHnZl7vPRS9iSuaEKScmS9kDZHjx6OChQJHAVNqXJ8aoAtb8fHUuFP4VRjK30ElgF h9+ZaF7pPAeZjKE1kiOSYPtvWoEDxbA+J5vM3khOcBkZds7UgiRIsaIjB3bCjLTfVtg1JE o5fXagiH7eszYPFDf9+yIf4xHpJcLN52IjpjqouGAN9nWGoRoBjDjJ1Jff+K9A== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=WjOhDjVW Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/{rust, rust-bin}: bump to version 1.66.0 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Eric Le Bihan , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello James, On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 18:35:07 -0700 James Hilliard wrote: > Link to Rust 1.66.0 annoucement: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2022/12/15/Rust-1.66.0.html > > Newest version of the source archives have been retrieved with their hash values, > and the signature of the .asc files have been verified as follows: > $ curl -fsSL https://static.rust-lang.org/rust-key.gpg.ascii | gpg --import > $ gpg --verify > > There is no typographical error in the packages according to the check-pakage utility: > $ ./utils/check-package package/rust-bin/* > $ ./utils/check-package package/rust/* > > The testsuite tool were successfully run for rust and rust-bin packages to test > the Rust toolchain under 1.66.0: > $ ./support/testing/run-tests -k -d dl/ -o testsuite tests.package.test_rust.TestRustBin > $ ./support/testing/run-tests -k -d dl/ -o testsuite tests.package.test_rust.TestRust > > In order to verify the compatibility of packages depending on Rust 1.66.0, > tests using `./utils/test-pkg` were run. > You may want to execute the test-pkg command after creating a `.config` file > enabling the corresponding BR2_PACKAGE, for example: > Create a file `buildroot/ripgrep.config` containing "BR2_PACKAGE_RIPGREP=y" > Then execute: > $ ./utils/test-pkg -d test-pkg -c ripgrep.config -p ripgrep > > Results: > librsvg OK > ripgrep OK > suricata OK > bat OK Hmm, you know that instead of creating one snippet for each package, you can create a single snippet that enables all those packages? It would actually be a useful snippet to add in the commit log as it could be useful for future updates of the Rust compiler. > package/rust-bin/rust-bin.hash | 252 ++++++++++++++++----------------- > package/rust-bin/rust-bin.mk | 2 +- > package/rust/rust.hash | 6 +- > package/rust/rust.mk | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-) Applied to master, thanks. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot