From: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Fix PMU freq verification with SLPC
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 17:11:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230107011127.39537-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
After the i915 commit 95ccf312a1e4f ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allow SLPC to use
efficient frequency"), FW uses the requested freq as the efficient freq
which can exceed the max freq set. Therefore, in the "min freq" part of the
igt@perf_pmu@frequency subtest, compare the requested freq reported by PMU
not against the set freq but against the requested freq reported in sysfs.
v2: Remove v1 patches which need to be redone. In v2 just add failing tests
to BAT testlist to try to repro the failures
v3: Add modified v1 patches with minimal changes which are expected to fix
the two issues
v4: Retest
v5: Increase comparison tolerance and add comments to code explaining
reason for the changes
Ashutosh Dixit (3):
tests/perf_pmu: Compare against requested freq in frequency subtest
tests/gem_ctx_freq: Compare against requested freq
HAX: Add gem_ctx_freq@sysfs and perf_pmu@frequency to
fast-feedback.testlist
tests/i915/gem_ctx_freq.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 12 ++++++++++--
tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 ++
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.38.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-07 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-07 1:11 Ashutosh Dixit [this message]
2023-01-07 1:11 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/perf_pmu: Compare against requested freq in frequency subtest Ashutosh Dixit
2023-01-07 1:11 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/gem_ctx_freq: Compare against requested freq Ashutosh Dixit
2023-01-07 1:11 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] HAX: Add gem_ctx_freq@sysfs and perf_pmu@frequency to fast-feedback.testlist Ashutosh Dixit
2023-01-07 2:01 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Fix PMU freq verification with SLPC (rev5) Patchwork
2023-01-07 3:59 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-01-07 23:51 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Fix PMU freq verification with SLPC (rev6) Patchwork
2023-01-08 1:13 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-01-09 18:49 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Fix PMU freq verification with SLPC (rev7) Patchwork
2023-01-10 2:28 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-10 19:47 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Fix PMU freq verification with SLPC Ashutosh Dixit
2023-01-05 4:41 Ashutosh Dixit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230107011127.39537-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.