[PATCH] seccomp: fix kernel-doc function name warning

From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] seccomp: fix kernel-doc function name warning
Date: Sat,  7 Jan 2023 18:12:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230108021228.15975-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> (raw)

Move the ACTION_ONLY() macro so that it is not between the kernel-doc
notation and the function definition for seccomp_run_filters(),
eliminating a kernel-doc warning:

kernel/seccomp.c:400: warning: expecting prototype for seccomp_run_filters(). Prototype was for ACTION_ONLY() instead

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
---
 kernel/seccomp.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -- a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c

--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_a
 }
 #endif /* SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE */
 
+#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
 /**
  * seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
  * @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
@@ -397,7 +398,6 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_a
  *
  * Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
  */
-#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
 static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
 			       struct seccomp_filter **match)
 {
