From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E97749D for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BAF9C433D2; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:13:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1673532791; bh=E4lei+1C8TJdzdU6L6ZhYCyB0ufrywpb31IgqBawctE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NxM7SkW+sVWdJ703EppFdvqEQnXYBP2KzC1QAea/pUEkIQFV5tMu/ykogC2uiKhBQ BgBm1FzF2s0+x++fVSHUzpkNioOPtfOJPvwF7Bvf7IrzYoZpQJeoKEp8thr9qEUe6C 8ku1det21k85XivInOhKFOuzkAR8f08BuZSFM9bQ= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, John Johansen , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 278/783] apparmor: fix lockdep warning when removing a namespace Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:49:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20230112135537.286562800@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0 In-Reply-To: <20230112135524.143670746@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20230112135524.143670746@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: John Johansen [ Upstream commit 9c4557efc558a68e4cd973490fd936d6e3414db8 ] Fix the following lockdep warning [ 1119.158984] ============================================ [ 1119.158988] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 1119.158996] 6.0.0-rc1+ #257 Tainted: G E N [ 1119.158999] -------------------------------------------- [ 1119.159001] bash/80100 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1119.159007] ffff88803e79b4a0 (&ns->lock/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: destroy_ns.part.0+0x43/0x140 [ 1119.159028] but task is already holding lock: [ 1119.159030] ffff8881009764a0 (&ns->lock/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: aa_remove_profiles+0x3f0/0x640 [ 1119.159040] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1119.159042] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1119.159043] CPU0 [ 1119.159045] ---- [ 1119.159047] lock(&ns->lock/1); [ 1119.159051] lock(&ns->lock/1); [ 1119.159055] *** DEADLOCK *** Which is caused by an incorrect lockdep nesting notation Fixes: feb3c766a3ab ("apparmor: fix possible recursive lock warning in __aa_create_ns") Signed-off-by: John Johansen Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- security/apparmor/policy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy.c b/security/apparmor/policy.c index 4c010c9a6af1..fcf22577f606 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/policy.c +++ b/security/apparmor/policy.c @@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ ssize_t aa_remove_profiles(struct aa_ns *policy_ns, struct aa_label *subj, if (!name) { /* remove namespace - can only happen if fqname[0] == ':' */ - mutex_lock_nested(&ns->parent->lock, ns->level); + mutex_lock_nested(&ns->parent->lock, ns->parent->level); __aa_bump_ns_revision(ns); __aa_remove_ns(ns); mutex_unlock(&ns->parent->lock); -- 2.35.1